• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗的应用:范围综述

Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Doraiswamy Sathyanarayanan, Abraham Amit, Mamtani Ravinder, Cheema Sohaila

机构信息

Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):e24087. doi: 10.2196/24087.

DOI:10.2196/24087
PMID:33147166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7710390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With over 37.8 million cases and over 1 million deaths worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic has created a societal and economic upheaval of unparalleled magnitude. A positive transformation has been brought about by innovative solutions in the health care sector that aim to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on human health. For instance, the use of telehealth has been on the rise amidst this public health emergency.

OBJECTIVE

Given the unprecedented scale of the pandemic with no definitive endpoint, we aimed to scope the existing telehealth-related literature during a defined period of the ongoing pandemic (ie, January to June 2020).

METHODS

Our scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer Manual. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases with specific eligibility criteria. Data extracted from the shortlisted articles included first author and affiliation, journal title, publication type, terminologies used to describe telehealth and their accompanying definitions, health discipline or medical specialties and subspecialties wherein telehealth had been applied, the purpose of telehealth use, and the authors' overall sentiment on telehealth use. We collated the available information and used descriptive statistics to analyze the synthesized data.

RESULTS

In all, 543 articles published across 331 different journals were included in this scoping review. The Journal of Medical Internet Research and its sister journals featured the highest number of articles (25/543, 4.6%). Nearly all (533/543, 98.2%) articles were in English. The majority of the articles were opinions, commentaries, and perspectives (333/543, 61.3%). Most authors of the articles reviewed were from high-income countries (470/543, 86.6%), especially from the United States of America (237/543, 43.6%). In all, 39 different definitions were used to describe terms equivalent to telehealth. A small percentage (42/543, 7.7%) of the articles focused on the provision of COVID-19-related care. Moreover, 49.7% (270/543) of the articles primarily focused on the provision of multiple components of clinical care, and 23% (125/543) of the articles focused on various specialties and subspecialties of internal medicine. For a vast majority (461/543, 84.9%) of the articles, the authors expressed a celebratory sentiment about the use of telehealth.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified considerable emerging literature on telehealth during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit mostly from high-income countries. There is compelling evidence to suggest that telehealth may have a significant effect on advancing health care in the future. However, the feasibility and application of telehealth in resource-limited settings and low- and middle-income countries must be established to avail its potential and transform health care for the world's population. Given the rapidity with which telehealth is advancing, a global consensus on definitions, boundaries, protocols, monitoring, evaluation, and data privacy is urgently needed.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/92c683e84f56/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/e381e2cce378/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/273754b3d6c7/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/92c683e84f56/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/e381e2cce378/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/273754b3d6c7/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3a/7710390/92c683e84f56/jmir_v22i12e24087_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情在全球范围内已导致超过3780万例确诊病例和超过100万人死亡,引发了前所未有的社会和经济动荡。医疗保健领域的创新解决方案带来了积极转变,旨在减轻新型冠状病毒肺炎对人类健康的影响。例如,在此次突发公共卫生事件期间,远程医疗的使用呈上升趋势。

目的

鉴于此次疫情规模空前且尚无明确终点,我们旨在梳理在疫情持续期间(即2020年1月至6月)已有的与远程医疗相关的文献。

方法

我们的范围综述以乔安娜·布里格斯研究所综述手册为指导。我们按照特定的纳入标准,系统检索了PubMed和Embase数据库。从入围文章中提取的数据包括第一作者及其所属机构、期刊名称、出版类型、用于描述远程医疗的术语及其相应定义、应用远程医疗的健康学科或医学专业及亚专业、使用远程医疗的目的,以及作者对远程医疗使用的总体看法。我们整理了可用信息,并使用描述性统计方法分析综合数据。

结果

本范围综述共纳入了331种不同期刊发表的543篇文章。《医学互联网研究杂志》及其姊妹期刊刊载的文章数量最多(25/543,4.6%)。几乎所有文章(533/543,98.2%)均为英文。大多数文章为观点、评论和视角类(333/543,61.3%)。所综述文章的大多数作者来自高收入国家(470/543,86.6%),尤其是美国(237/543,43.6%)。共有39种不同的定义用于描述与远程医疗等同的术语。一小部分文章(42/543,7.7%)聚焦于提供与新型冠状病毒肺炎相关的护理。此外,49.7%(270/543)的文章主要聚焦于提供临床护理的多个组成部分,23%(125/543)的文章聚焦于内科的各个专业和亚专业。对于绝大多数文章(461/543,84.9%),作者对远程医疗的使用表达了赞赏之情。

结论

本综述发现,在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的前六个月,涌现出了大量关于远程医疗的文献,不过大多来自高收入国家。有令人信服的证据表明,远程医疗可能会对未来推进医疗保健产生重大影响。然而,必须确定远程医疗在资源有限环境以及低收入和中等收入国家的可行性和应用情况,以发挥其潜力并为全球人口变革医疗保健。鉴于远程医疗发展迅速,迫切需要就定义、范围、协议、监测、评估和数据隐私达成全球共识。

相似文献

1
Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗的应用:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):e24087. doi: 10.2196/24087.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Telehealth Use and Legal Considerations in Drug Health Services During Pandemics: Systematic Scoping Review.远程医疗在大流行期间药物健康服务中的使用及法律问题考量:系统范围界定综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 12;26:e46394. doi: 10.2196/46394.
4
Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientific Literature.新冠疫情期间医疗保健领域数字技术的应用:早期科学文献的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e22280. doi: 10.2196/22280.
5
Telehealth interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of applications, challenges, privacy and security issues.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗干预措施:应用、挑战、隐私和安全问题的范围综述。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Aug;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100676.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Telehealth Use in Geriatrics Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Scoping Review and Evidence Synthesis.远程医疗在 COVID-19 大流行期间的老年病学护理中的应用——范围综述和证据综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041755.
8
Exploration of implementation, financial and technical considerations within allied health professional (AHP) telehealth consultation guidance: a scoping review including UK AHP professional bodies' guidance.探讨联合健康专业人员(AHP)远程医疗咨询指南中的实施、财务和技术考虑因素:一项包括英国 AHP 专业机构指南的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 27;11(12):e055823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055823.
9
Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗应用:一项系统综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
10
Models of Incorporating Telehealth into Obstetric Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Its Benefits And Barriers: A Scoping Review.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间将远程医疗纳入产科护理的模式、益处及障碍:一项范围综述
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Jan;28(1):24-38. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0553. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of an Online Nursing Consultation to Encourage Breastfeeding.在线护理咨询对促进母乳喂养的效果
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04166-8.
2
Interventions for adult survivors discharged from the intensive care unit: a scoping review.针对从重症监护病房出院的成年幸存者的干预措施:一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 16;15(8):e096634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096634.
3
A systematic review of methods used for COVID-19 telehealth systems evaluation: lessons from past experiences for future use.对用于COVID-19远程医疗系统评估的方法的系统评价:过去经验对未来应用的启示。

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Moves Medicine into a Virtual Space: A Paradigm Shift From Touch to Talk to Establish Trust.新冠疫情将医学带入虚拟空间:从接触到交流以建立信任的范式转变。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):e159-e160. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004098.
2
Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge.疫情期间的出版带来了新的新冠疫情挑战。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):666-669. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0.
3
Wearable Technology and How This Can Be Implemented into Clinical Practice.可穿戴技术及其在临床实践中的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):1089. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13315-2.
4
Patient Experience of Virtual Hospital Care Provided by a Multidisciplinary Team: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.多学科团队提供的虚拟医院护理的患者体验:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 15;14:e72729. doi: 10.2196/72729.
5
Telehealth use among registered nurses: A national sample survey analysis.注册护士对远程医疗的使用:一项全国样本调查分析。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 Aug 8;73(5):102522. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102522.
6
Speech-language Telepractice Services During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Perspectives from Parents in Malaysia.新冠疫情封锁期间的言语语言远程诊疗服务:马来西亚家长的观点
Int J Telerehabil. 2025 Jun 12;17(1):6650. doi: 10.63144/ijt.2025.6650. eCollection 2025.
7
Global Diseases Deserve Global Solutions: Alzheimer's Disease.全球疾病需要全球解决方案:阿尔茨海默病。
Neurol Int. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):92. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17060092.
8
An evaluation of telehealth services at New York City tuberculosis clinics throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.对纽约市结核病诊所整个新冠疫情期间远程医疗服务的评估。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 24;4(6):e0000898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Online coding of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) to capture treatment response in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.对社会沟通变化简短观察量表(BOSCC)进行在线编码,以捕捉患有自闭症谱系障碍的极少言语儿童的治疗反应。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251347105. doi: 10.1177/20552076251347105. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
Exploring the feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of telehealth for delivering a pain management group program: A retrospective study.探索远程医疗用于提供疼痛管理小组项目的可行性、有效性和可接受性:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0325298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325298. eCollection 2025.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Jun 6;20(8):36. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00927-3.
4
Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review.新冠疫情时代下的医学与外科教育挑战和创新:一项系统性回顾。
In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11950.
5
Telepsychiatry during COVID-19: Some clinical, public health, and ethical dilemmas.新冠疫情期间的远程精神病学:一些临床、公共卫生和伦理困境。
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jun;64(Supplement):S245-S246. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_511_20.
6
Telemedicine - maintaining quality during times of transition.远程医疗 - 转型时期的质量保障。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Jun 1;6(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0185-x.
7
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.
8
Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review.视频通话对减少老年人的社会隔离和孤独感:一项快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 21;5(5):CD013632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013632.
9
Delivering psychotherapy by video conference in the time of COVID-19: Some considerations.在新冠疫情期间通过视频会议提供心理治疗:一些考量
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;28(5):751-752. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12659. Epub 2020 May 31.
10
Continuing medical education during a pandemic: an academic institution's experience.大流行期间的继续医学教育:学术机构的经验。
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul;96(1137):384-386. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137840. Epub 2020 May 13.