South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 6;12(6):e056803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056803.
To provide a route map regarding systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture therapies that will meet two goals: (1) to identify areas in which more or better evidence is required and (2) to identify acupuncture applications that, although proven effective, remain underused in practice, and thus warrant more effective knowledge dissemination.
We included SRs that conducted meta-analyses (MAs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for this overview.
We searched for SRs without language restrictions from January 2015 to November 2020 in four Chinese electronic databases and Epistemonikos database. And we also searched for newly published RCTs that were eligible for selected best SRs in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and four Chinese electronic databases from its lasted search dates to November 2020.
We reanalysed the selected MAs if new primary studies were added. We used random-effect model to calculate the overall effect.
Our search identified 120 SRs published in the last 5 years addressing acupuncture therapies across 12 therapeutic areas and 77 diseases and conditions. The SRs included 205 outcomes and involved 138 995 participants from 1402 RCTs. We constructed 77 evidence matrices, including 120 SRs and their included RCTs in the Epistemonikos database. Seventy-seven SRs represented the effect estimate of acupuncture therapies. Finally, we system summarised the areas of possible underutilisation of acupuncture therapies (high or moderate certainty evidence of large or moderate effects), and the areas of warranting additional investigation of acupuncture therapies (low or very low certainty evidence of moderate or large effects).
The evidence maps and overview of SRs on acupuncture therapies identified both therapies with substantial benefits that may require more assertive evidence dissemination and promising acupuncture therapies that require further investigation.
提供一份有关针灸疗法系统评价(SRs)的路线图,以实现两个目标:(1)确定需要更多或更好证据的领域;(2)确定虽然已被证明有效但在实践中仍未得到充分应用的针灸应用,因此需要更有效的知识传播。
本综述纳入了对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行荟萃分析(MAs)的 SRs。
我们从 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月,在四个中文电子数据库和 Epistemonikos 数据库中,无语言限制地搜索了 SRs。我们还在 PubMed、Medline、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Embase 和四个中文电子数据库中,对从最新检索日期到 2020 年 11 月符合入选最佳 SRs 的新发表 RCTs 进行了搜索。
如果新增了新的原始研究,我们对所选 MA 进行了重新分析。我们使用随机效应模型计算总体效应。
我们的搜索共确定了过去 5 年发表的 120 篇涉及 12 个治疗领域和 77 种疾病的针灸疗法的 SRs。这些 SRs 包含 205 个结局,涉及来自 1402 项 RCTs 的 138995 名参与者。我们构建了 77 个证据矩阵,其中包括 Epistemonikos 数据库中的 120 篇 SRs 及其包含的 RCTs。77 篇 SRs 代表了针灸疗法的效应估计。最后,我们系统地总结了针灸疗法可能未得到充分利用的领域(高或中确定性证据,大或中效应),以及需要进一步研究的针灸疗法领域(低或极低确定性证据,中或大效应)。
针灸疗法的证据图和 SRs 综述确定了具有显著益处的疗法,这些疗法可能需要更积极的证据传播,以及需要进一步研究的有前途的针灸疗法。