Suppr超能文献

针灸、静脉注射利多卡因和饮食对纤维肌痛患者的治疗效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Efficacy of Acupuncture, Intravenous Lidocaine, and Diet in the Management of Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Almutairi Nawaf Masaad, Hilal Faisal Mohammed, Bashawyah Ahmed, Dammas Fatma Al, Yamak Altinpulluk Ece, Hou Jin-De, Lin Jui-An, Varrassi Giustino, Chang Ke-Vin, Allam Abdallah El-Sayed

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Board of Anesthesia SPA, Ministry of Health, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah 23325, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;10(7):1176. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071176.

Abstract

This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of acupuncture, intravenous lidocaine, and diet compared with other comparators such as physiotherapy and sham/placebo in fibromyalgia patients. We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies till September 2021. The included studies were randomized controlled clinical trials. For the network meta-analysis, we used the R software. There were 23 included RCTs. The total sample size was 1409 patients. Compared with the sham/placebo group, the network analysis showed the highest improvement in the quality of life in the acupuncture group standardized mean difference (SMD) = -10.28, 95%-CI [-14.96; -5.59]), and then in the physiotherapy group (SMD = -7.48, 95%-CI [-14.72; -0.23]). For the pain, there was a significant reduction with acupuncture (SMD = -1.69, 95%-CI [-2.48; -0.89]), compared with sham/placebo. Regarding depression, it showed a significant reduction with acupuncture (SMD = -9.64, 95%-CI [-16.13; -3.14]) compared with sham/placebo. Finally, for stiffness, it showed no significant differences in the stiffness between acupuncture (SMD = -8.52, 95%-CI [-20.40; 3.36]), fluoxetine (SMD = -6.52, 95%-CI [-29.65; 16.61]), and physiotherapy (SMD = -4.64, 95%-CI [-22.83; 13.54]) compared with sham/placebo. The acupuncture showed a significant effect in the management of fibromyalgia patients. It reduced pain, depression, and enhanced the quality of life. While physiotherapy showed a significant improvement in the quality of life only. In contrast, intravenous lidocaine and diet showed no significant differences when compared with sham/placebo.

摘要

这项网络荟萃分析旨在评估与物理治疗和假治疗/安慰剂等其他对照方法相比,针灸、静脉注射利多卡因和饮食疗法对纤维肌痛患者的疗效。我们检索了截至2021年9月的Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中的相关研究。纳入的研究为随机对照临床试验。对于网络荟萃分析,我们使用了R软件。共纳入23项随机对照试验。总样本量为1409例患者。与假治疗/安慰剂组相比,网络分析显示针灸组生活质量改善最为显著(标准化均数差[SMD]=-10.28,95%可信区间[-14.96;-5.59]),其次是物理治疗组(SMD=-7.48,95%可信区间[-14.72;-0.23])。在疼痛方面,与假治疗/安慰剂相比,针灸显著减轻了疼痛(SMD=-1.69,95%可信区间[-2.48;-0.89])。在抑郁方面,与假治疗/安慰剂相比,针灸显著减轻了抑郁(SMD=-9.64,95%可信区间[-16.13;-3.14])。最后,在僵硬方面,与假治疗/安慰剂相比,针灸(SMD=-8.52,95%可信区间[-20.40;3.36])、氟西汀(SMD=-6.52,95%可信区间[-29.65;16.61])和物理治疗(SMD=-4.64,95%可信区间[-22.83;13.54])之间在僵硬程度上没有显著差异。针灸对纤维肌痛患者的治疗显示出显著效果。它减轻了疼痛、抑郁,并提高了生活质量。而物理治疗仅在生活质量方面有显著改善。相比之下,静脉注射利多卡因和饮食疗法与假治疗/安慰剂相比没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/030d/9320380/017bdcde4865/healthcare-10-01176-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验