Suppr超能文献

全科医生基于指南的远程医疗评估骨科低风险疾病并不逊色于急诊科与专科医生面对面会诊:一项随机试验。

Guideline-Based Telemedicine Assessment of Orthopedic Low-Risk Conditions by General Practitioners is Not Inferior to that of Face-to-Face Consultations with Specialists in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Foni Noel Oizerovici, Accorsi Tarso Augusto Duenhas, Correia Renata Farias Vidigal, Moreira Flavio Tocci, Lima Karine De Amicis, Morbeck Renata Albaladejo, Souza Jose Leão de, Pedrotti Carlos Henrique Sartorato, Wolosker Nelson

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Telemedicine Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2024 Dec;30(12):2859-2869. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0312. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

There is a lack of randomized controlled trials focusing on orthopedic telemedicine (TM). The objective of this research was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and pattern of TM consultations of low-risk orthopedic patients performed by general practitioners (GPs) with those of face-to-face evaluations by orthopedists at an emergency department (ED). This randomized, single-center study was conducted between October 2021 and November 2022 on patients at an ED. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, low back pain, extremity contusion, ankle sprain, or neck pain. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 for TM consultations by generalist physicians with subsequent face-to-face orthopedic evaluations (TM-ED group) or face-to-face evaluations by orthopedic physicians (ED group). Primary outcomes were syndromic diagnosis, physical examination, and tests ordered. Secondary analysis included a satisfaction survey. A total of 99 patients were enrolled; mean age was 41 ± 10.1 years, and 62.6% were female. The most common conditions were foot contusion (28.3%), ankle sprain (27.3%), hand contusion (19.2%), low back pain (19.2%), and neck pain (6.1%). Syndromic diagnosis showed no difference between groups ( = 0.231). In the TM-ED group ( = 51), self-examination demonstrated moderate to good agreement with face-to-face evaluations in several areas. Both groups showed similar tests practices. Patient satisfaction was higher in the TM-ED group across multiple measures. TM consultations for low-risk orthopedic patients by GPs are not inferior to face-to-face specialist evaluations at the ED. Virtual assessments are associated with higher patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04981002.

摘要

目前缺乏针对骨科远程医疗(TM)的随机对照试验。本研究的目的是比较全科医生(GPs)对低风险骨科患者进行的TM会诊的诊断准确性和模式,与急诊科(ED)骨科医生进行的面对面评估的诊断准确性和模式。这项随机、单中心研究于2021年10月至2022年11月在一家急诊科对患者进行。纳入标准为年龄>18岁、腰痛、肢体挫伤、踝关节扭伤或颈部疼痛。符合条件的患者按1:1随机分组,由全科医生进行TM会诊,随后进行面对面的骨科评估(TM-ED组)或由骨科医生进行面对面评估(ED组)。主要结局指标为症状诊断、体格检查和所开的检查。次要分析包括满意度调查。共纳入99例患者;平均年龄为41±10.1岁,62.6%为女性。最常见的病症为足部挫伤(28.3%)、踝关节扭伤(27.3%)、手部挫伤(19.2%)、腰痛(19.2%)和颈部疼痛(6.1%)。症状诊断在两组之间无差异( = 0.231)。在TM-ED组( = 51)中,自我检查在几个方面与面对面评估显示出中度至良好的一致性。两组的检查操作相似。在多项指标上,TM-ED组的患者满意度更高。全科医生对低风险骨科患者进行的TM会诊并不逊于急诊科的面对面专科评估。虚拟评估与更高的患者满意度相关。临床试验标识符:NCT04981002。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验