Suppr超能文献

洗必泰醇溶液与水性/酒精性碘溶液预防手术部位感染的疗效评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs. aqueous/alcoholic iodine solutions for the prevention of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yang Qiong, Sun Jingxian, Yang Zhao, Rastogi Sanjay, Liu Yan-Feng, Zhao Bin-Bin

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical School, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7353-7366. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the prevailing complication that occurs after surgery and significantly escalates healthcare expenses. Published meta-analyses and international standards vary in their recommendations for the most effective preoperative skin antiseptic solution and concentration.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidine-alcohol compared to aqueous/alcoholic iodine solutions in preventing postoperative surgical site infections.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to select publications published in peer-reviewed journals. The risk ratio (RR) was calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and I2 statistics and the appropriate P value. The analysis used RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

The current meta-analysis includes 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing either 2-2.5% chlorhexidine-alcohol with aqueous/alcoholic iodine. It was demonstrated that the CAG-using group had an overall lower incidence of postoperative surgical site infections compared to the iodine-using group (RR=0.30, 95% CI=0.20-0.46, I2 =95%, P <0.00001). It exhibits comparable efficacy across various surgical procedures, as evidenced by its RR of 0.25 [95% CI 0.15-0.41], I2 =51%, and P <0.0001 for general surgery, RR=0.47 [95% CI 0.32-0.67], I2 =82%, P =0.0002 for cesarean section and RR of 0.47 [95% CI 0.34-0.65], I2 =76% and P <0.00001 for additional surgical procedures, including neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, etc.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests using either 2.0-2.5% chlorhexidine in alcohol instead of aqueous, alcoholic iodine to prevent SSIs in adult patients undergoing surgery. Chlorhexidine in alcohol worked effectively for general surgery, cesarean sections, and other surgeries. Thus, preoperative skin cleansing with chlorhexidine-alcohol minimizes postoperative SSIs and bacterial colonization in diverse procedures.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)是手术后常见的并发症,会显著增加医疗费用。已发表的荟萃分析和国际标准对于最有效的术前皮肤消毒溶液及其浓度的建议各不相同。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估洗必泰酒精溶液与水性/酒精性碘溶液相比在预防术后手术部位感染方面的有效性。

方法

使用四个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆)进行系统检索,以选择在同行评审期刊上发表的文献。计算风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间。我们使用Cochrane Q和I²统计量以及适当的P值评估异质性。分析使用RevMan 5.4。

结果

当前的荟萃分析包括14项随机对照试验(RCT),比较了2-2.5%的洗必泰酒精溶液与水性/酒精性碘溶液。结果表明,与使用碘溶液的组相比,使用洗必泰酒精溶液的组术后手术部位感染的总体发生率更低(RR = 0.30,95%CI = 0.20-0.46,I² = 95%,P < 0.00001)。在各种手术中,其疗效相当,普通外科手术的RR为0.25 [95%CI 0.15-0.41],I² = 51%,P < 0.0001;剖宫产手术的RR = 0.47 [95%CI 0.32-0.67],I² = 82%,P = 0.0002;包括神经外科、骨科手术等在内的其他手术的RR为0.47 [95%CI 0.34-0.65],I² = 76%,P < 0.00001。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,对于接受手术的成年患者,使用2.0-2.5%的酒精洗必泰溶液而非水性、酒精性碘溶液来预防手术部位感染。酒精洗必泰溶液在普通外科手术、剖宫产手术及其他手术中均有效。因此,术前用洗必泰酒精溶液进行皮肤清洁可将各种手术中的术后手术部位感染和细菌定植降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97c/11573111/7e1d0527e7be/js9-110-7353-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验