Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, A30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 21;28(1):113. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02976-6.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis may require both liver transplantation and colectomy. There are concerns about increased rates of hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary strictures, and hepatic graft loss in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis compared to those with end ileostomy. We hypothesized that graft survival was not negatively affected by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis compared to end ileostomy.
A tertiary center's database was searched for patients meeting the criteria of liver transplantation because of primary sclerosing cholangitis and total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or end ileostomy because of ulcerative colitis. Primary endpoints were hepatic graft survival and post-transplant complications.
Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria between January 1990 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (84%) underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and 9 (16%) underwent end ileostomy. The average age at total proctocolectomy (41.5 vs. 49.1 years; p = 0.12) and sex distribution (female: 26.1% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99) were comparable. The rates of re-transplantation (21.7% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99), hepatic artery thrombosis (10.8% vs. 0; p = 0.58), acute rejection (32.6% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.7), chronic rejection (4.3% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.42), recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (23.9% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99), and biliary strictures (19.6% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.36) were similar between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and end ileostomy groups, respectively. None of the end ileostomy patients developed parastomal varices. The log-rank tests for graft (p = 0.97), recipient (p = 0.3), and combined graft/recipient survival (p = 0.73) were similar.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis did not negatively affect graft, recipient, and combined graft/recipient survival, or the long-term complications, compared to end ileostomy.
患有炎症性肠病和原发性硬化性胆管炎的患者可能需要进行肝移植和结肠切除术。与回肠造口术相比,有回肠袋肛管吻合术的患者发生肝动脉血栓形成、胆管狭窄和肝移植物丢失的风险更高,这令人担忧。我们假设与回肠造口术相比,回肠袋肛管吻合术不会对移植物存活率产生负面影响。
检索一家三级中心的数据库,寻找因原发性硬化性胆管炎而接受肝移植以及因溃疡性结肠炎而行全直肠结肠切除加回肠袋肛管吻合术或回肠造口术的患者。主要终点是肝移植物存活率和移植后并发症。
1990 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,共有 55 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,46 名(84%)患者接受了回肠袋肛管吻合术,9 名(16%)患者接受了回肠造口术。全直肠结肠切除术时的平均年龄(41.5 岁 vs. 49.1 岁;p=0.12)和性别分布(女性:26.1% vs. 22.2%;p=0.99)相当。再次移植的发生率(21.7% vs. 22.2%;p=0.99)、肝动脉血栓形成(10.8% vs. 0;p=0.58)、急性排斥反应(32.6% vs. 44.4%;p=0.7)、慢性排斥反应(4.3% vs. 11.1%;p=0.42)、原发性硬化性胆管炎复发(23.9% vs. 22.2%;p=0.99)和胆管狭窄(19.6% vs. 33.3%;p=0.36)在回肠袋肛管吻合术和回肠造口术组之间相似。回肠造口术组无一例发生侧侧吻合口静脉曲张。移植物(p=0.97)、受者(p=0.3)和移植物/受者联合存活率(p=0.73)的对数秩检验均无显著差异。
与回肠造口术相比,回肠袋肛管吻合术不会对移植物、受者和移植物/受者联合存活率或长期并发症产生负面影响。