Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, School of Medicine & University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;42(32):3837-3846. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00285. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
Controversy continues regarding the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer outcomes. We evaluated late-stage cancer rate and overall survival (OS) for different screening intervals using a real-world institutional research data mart.
Patients having both a cancer registry record of new breast cancer diagnosis and prediagnosis screening history between 2004 and 2019 were identified from our institutional research breast data mart. Time interval between the two screening mammograms immediately preceding diagnosis and the time to cancer diagnosis were determined. Screening interval was deemed annual if ≤15 months, biennial if >15 and ≤27 months, intermittent if >27 months, and baseline if only one prediagnosis screen was known. The primary end point was late-stage cancer (TNM stage IIB or worse), and the secondary end point was OS. The association of screening interval and late-stage cancer was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for prediagnosis characteristics. Proportional hazards regression was used for survival analysis. Potential lead time was analyzed using survival from a uniform fixed time point.
In total, 8,145 patients with breast cancer had prediagnosis screening mammography in the timeframe. The percentage of late-stage cancers diagnosed increased significantly with screening interval with 9%, 14%, and 19% late stages for annual, biennial, and intermittent groups ( < .001), respectively. The trend persisted regardless of age, race, and menopausal status. Biennial and intermittent groups had substantially worse OS than the annual screened group, with relative hazards of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.82) and 2.69 (95% CI, 2.11 to 3.43), respectively, and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.78) and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.58 to 2.55) after adjustment for potential lead time.
Annual mammographic screening was associated with lower risk of late-stage cancer and better OS across clinical and demographic subgroups. Our study suggests benefit of annual screening for women 40 years and older.
关于筛检乳房 X 光摄影对乳腺癌结果的影响,争议仍在持续。我们使用真实世界的机构研究数据集市,评估不同筛检间隔的晚期癌症发生率和总体生存率(OS)。
从我们机构的研究性乳腺数据集市中,确定了 2004 年至 2019 年间有癌症登记记录的新发乳腺癌诊断和诊断前筛检史的患者。确定了两次筛检乳房 X 光摄影之间的时间间隔和从诊断前筛检到癌症诊断的时间。如果间隔时间≤15 个月,则视为年度筛检,如果间隔时间>15 且≤27 个月,则视为两年一次筛检,如果间隔时间>27 个月,则视为间歇性筛检,如果仅知道一次诊断前筛检,则视为基线筛检。主要终点是晚期癌症(TNM 分期 IIB 或更差),次要终点是 OS。使用多变量逻辑回归分析调整诊断前特征后,分析筛检间隔与晚期癌症的关系。使用比例风险回归进行生存分析。使用从均匀固定时间点开始的生存分析来分析潜在的领先时间。
总共 8145 名患有乳腺癌的患者在规定时间内进行了诊断前筛检乳房 X 光摄影。随着筛检间隔的延长,诊断为晚期癌症的比例显著增加,分别为 9%、14%和 19%的年度、两年一次和间歇性组(<0.001)。这一趋势无论年龄、种族和绝经状态如何都持续存在。与年度筛查组相比,两年一次和间歇性筛查组的 OS 明显较差,相对危险度分别为 1.42(95%CI,1.11 至 1.82)和 2.69(95%CI,2.11 至 3.43),调整潜在领先时间后分别为 1.39(95%CI,1.08 至 1.78)和 2.01(95%CI,1.58 至 2.55)。
年度乳房 X 光筛检与较低的晚期癌症风险和更好的 OS 相关,无论临床和人口统计学亚组如何。我们的研究表明,40 岁及以上女性进行年度筛检是有益的。