• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国不同社区新冠疫情健康教育材料中图像清晰度的评估

Assessment of Clarity of Images in COVID-19 Health Education Materials Among Diverse Communities in the United States.

作者信息

Pinto Sarah J, Rubio Bianca, Blackmun Elsberry Lauren, Rivera Cesar, Rodriguez Lainz Alfonso

机构信息

Division of Global Migration Health, Cherokee Nation Operational Solutions, LLC.

Division of Global Migration Health, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2025 Jun;40(7):1213-1224. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2391644. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2391644
PMID:39169890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11845523/
Abstract

Given the need to provide clear communication to diverse audiences in the United States during public health emergencies, this assessment of images in COVID-19 communication materials identified ways to improve visual communication design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 74 participants from various racial and ethnic backgrounds to gauge the clarity of images without associated text used in two infographics. Most images were understood by participants, but for each image at least some participants had an interpretation different from intended or only captured a portion of the message. Some images were interpreted by most or all participants as representing something other than intended. Participant recommendations were used to develop seven practical ways to improve image clarity: realistic graphics, exaggerated body position and actions, details to show image context and background, icons to encourage or discourage actions, symbols to show movement, consistency in recommended behavior in each image, and closely matching image to associated text. These elements can be applied in combination with existing health equity guiding principles for creating visual communication products before testing and validating products with intended audiences of different sociodemographic and cultural background to ensure appropriateness and clarity of images.

摘要

鉴于在突发公共卫生事件期间需要与美国不同受众进行清晰沟通,此次对新冠疫情传播材料中图片的评估确定了改进视觉传播设计的方法。对74名来自不同种族和族裔背景的参与者进行了定性访谈,以评估两张信息图中无相关文字的图片的清晰度。大多数图片参与者都能理解,但对于每张图片,至少有一些参与者的理解与预期不同,或者只领会了部分信息。一些图片被大多数或所有参与者理解为代表了与预期不同的事物。参与者的建议被用于制定七种提高图片清晰度的实用方法:逼真的图形、夸张的身体姿势和动作、展示图片背景和上下文的细节、鼓励或劝阻行动的图标、表示动作的符号、每张图片中推荐行为的一致性,以及图片与相关文字的紧密匹配。这些元素可以与现有的健康公平指导原则相结合,在针对不同社会人口和文化背景的目标受众测试和验证视觉传播产品之前,用于创建视觉传播产品,以确保图片的适当性和清晰度。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Clarity of Images in COVID-19 Health Education Materials Among Diverse Communities in the United States.美国不同社区新冠疫情健康教育材料中图像清晰度的评估
Health Commun. 2025 Jun;40(7):1213-1224. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2391644. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.引产活跃期静脉滴注缩宫素的停用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD012274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012274.pub2.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of the use of visual aids in health education materials for persons with low-literacy levels.在低识字水平人群的健康教育材料中使用视觉辅助工具的范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):998-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.034. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Advancing Visual Health Communication Research to Improve Infodemic Response.推进视觉健康传播研究以改善信息疫情应对
Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1723-1728. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1838094. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Investigation of suitable illustrations in medical care.医疗护理中合适插图的研究。
J Vis Commun Med. 2019 Oct;42(4):158-168. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2019.1633237. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Visual representation of medical information: the importance of considering the end-user in the design of medical illustrations.医学信息的可视化呈现:在医学插图设计中考虑最终用户的重要性。
J Vis Commun Med. 2018 Jan;41(1):9-17. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2018.1405724. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information.美国疾病控制与预防中心清晰沟通指数是一种基于证据的新工具,用于编写和审核健康信息。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37. doi: 10.1177/1524839914538969. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
6
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
7
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
8
The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence.图片在改善健康传播中的作用:对注意力、理解、记忆和依从性相关研究的综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):173-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Aug 24.