Korukire Noel, Godson Ana, Mukamurigo Judith, Memunat Akanbi Oyiza, Izabayo Josias, Bashaija David, Ntakirutimana Theoneste
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35411. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
Air pollution is a global environmental and public health challenge. There is limited evidence about the air quality in Rwanda, and the concentrations of particulate matter (PM), namely PM and PM in schools have not been well documented. This study evaluated patterns and disparities in indoor PM levels in selected primary schools in Kigali, Rwanda. The study collected PM and PM concentrations from six classrooms in six selected primary schools during the regular school study period in the dry season. Data were collected using mobile air sensors (purple air/PA-II-SD air quality) and an observation checklist. A Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to assess the difference in PM and PM concentrations between the six schools. The post-hoc Mann-Whitney test was used to compare all group pairs. The results indicated a significant difference in both the indoor PM concentration (H (5) = 41.01, p < 0.001) and the indoor PM concentration (H (5) = 38.5, p < 0.001). The maximum concentration observed was 133.6 μg/m for PM and 158.5 μg/m for PM. Schools in highly exposed areas tended to have higher concentrations of PM than schools in moderately exposed areas. Specifically, the daily average concentration of PM in schools located in highly exposed areas ranged from 39 μg/m³ to 118 μg/m³, while PM levels ranged from 44.0 μg/m³ to 126 μg/m³. In contrast, schools in moderately exposed areas had daily PM average concentrations ranging from 32.0 μg/m³ to 111.0 μg/m³ and daily PM average concentrations ranging from 38.0 μg/m³ to 119 μg/m³. Overall, the recorded values for both PM and PM in all sampled schools were higher than the World Health Organization air quality guidelines. Indoor air quality is poorer in schools situated in highly exposed areas. This study suggests interventions to improve school air quality for the benefit of school communities.
空气污染是一项全球性的环境与公共卫生挑战。关于卢旺达空气质量的证据有限,学校内颗粒物(PM),即PM 和PM 的浓度尚未得到充分记录。本研究评估了卢旺达基加利选定小学室内PM水平的模式和差异。该研究在旱季正常上课期间,从六所选定小学的六个教室收集了PM 和PM 浓度数据。数据通过移动空气传感器(紫色空气/PA-II-SD空气质量)和观察清单收集。进行了Kruskal-Wallis检验以评估六所学校之间PM 和PM 浓度的差异。事后使用Mann-Whitney检验比较所有组对。结果表明,室内PM浓度(H(5)=41.01,p<0.001)和室内PM浓度(H(5)=38.5,p<0.001)均存在显著差异。观测到的最大浓度,PM为133.6μg/m ,PM为158.5μg/m 。高暴露地区的学校PM浓度往往高于中等暴露地区的学校。具体而言,高暴露地区学校的PM日均浓度范围为39μg/m³至118μg/m³,而PM水平范围为44.0μg/m³至126μg/m³。相比之下,中等暴露地区学校的PM日均浓度范围为32.0μg/m³至111.0μg/m³,PM日均浓度范围为38.0μg/m³至119μg/m³。总体而言,所有采样学校的PM和PM记录值均高于世界卫生组织的空气质量指南。高暴露地区学校的室内空气质量较差。本研究提出了改善学校空气质量的干预措施,以造福学校社区。