Chao Fa-An, Byrd R Andrew
NCI RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick, Maryland 21701-4907, United States.
Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States.
J Am Chem Soc. 2024 Sep 4;146(35):24467-24475. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c06720. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
It is common for NMR relaxation dispersion experiments to suggest an absence of dynamics despite anecdotal indications of conformational dynamics. We explore the potential explanations and approaches to this conundrum. Some inconsistencies have been observed between two relaxation dispersion experiments, Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) and adiabatic relaxation dispersion experiments, in recent dynamic studies of different biomolecules. Theoretical analyses show that such seemingly paradoxical results might come from a complex exchange topology that is concealed by the application of the simple two-site exchange model for interpretation of the relaxation dispersion data. Scenarios are explored and revealed in which the presence of complex millisecond conformational exchange could suppress the amplitude of CPMG relaxation dispersion profiles, even when the exchange rates are within the detectable range of the experiments. With experimental errors, the suppressed relaxation dispersion profiles could lead to the conclusion of "no millisecond conformational exchange". However, such hidden dynamics can potentially be detected by adiabatic relaxation dispersion experiments. Finally, we demonstrate some advantages of adiabatic relaxation dispersion experiments over conventional relaxation dispersion experiments and a simplified computational approach to analyze the adiabatic relaxation dispersion profiles.
在核磁共振弛豫色散实验中,尽管有构象动力学的传闻迹象,但常常表明不存在动力学。我们探讨了对这一难题的潜在解释和方法。在最近对不同生物分子的动力学研究中,在两种弛豫色散实验—— Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill(CPMG)实验和绝热弛豫色散实验之间观察到了一些不一致之处。理论分析表明,这种看似矛盾的结果可能源于复杂的交换拓扑结构,而这种结构在应用简单的双位点交换模型来解释弛豫色散数据时被掩盖了。我们探索并揭示了这样的情况:即使交换速率在实验可检测范围内,复杂的毫秒级构象交换的存在也可能抑制CPMG弛豫色散谱的幅度。由于实验误差,被抑制的弛豫色散谱可能会得出“不存在毫秒级构象交换”的结论。然而,这种隐藏的动力学有可能通过绝热弛豫色散实验检测到。最后,我们展示了绝热弛豫色散实验相对于传统弛豫色散实验的一些优势,以及一种用于分析绝热弛豫色散谱的简化计算方法。