• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将研究结果作为对“我们所有人的研究计划”参与者的价值回报进行沟通:来自联邦合格健康中心工作人员的见解。

Communicating research findings as a return of value to All of Us Research Program participants: insights from staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

作者信息

Smith Kathryn P, Holmes Jenn, Shelley Jennifer

机构信息

Health Transformation & Research, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730, United States.

Health Behavioral and Social Sciences, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2962-2967. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae207.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae207
PMID:39172387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631114/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Research participants value learning how their data contributions are advancing health research (ie, data stories). The All of Us Research Program gathered insights from program staff to learn what research topics they think are of interest to participants, what support staff need to communicate data stories, and how staff use data story dissemination tools.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using an online 25-item assessment, we collected information from All of Us staff at 7 Federally Qualified Health Centers.

RESULTS

Topics of greatest interest or relevance included income insecurity (83%), diabetes (78%), and mental health (78%). Respondents prioritized in-person outreach in the community (70%) as a preferred setting to share data stories. Familiarity with available dissemination tools varied.

DISCUSSION

Responses support prioritizing materials for in-person outreach and training staff how to use dissemination tools.

CONCLUSION

The findings will inform All of Us communication strategy, content, materials, and staff training resources to effectively deliver data stories as return of value to participants.

摘要

目标

研究参与者重视了解他们的数据贡献如何推动健康研究(即数据故事)。“我们所有人”研究项目从项目工作人员那里收集了见解,以了解他们认为参与者感兴趣的研究主题、工作人员在传达数据故事时需要哪些支持,以及工作人员如何使用数据故事传播工具。

材料与方法

我们通过一项包含25个项目的在线评估,从7家联邦合格健康中心的“我们所有人”项目工作人员那里收集了信息。

结果

最受关注或最相关的主题包括收入不安全(83%)、糖尿病(78%)和心理健康(78%)。受访者将社区中的面对面宣传(70%)列为分享数据故事的首选方式。对现有传播工具的熟悉程度各不相同。

讨论

这些回答支持优先为面对面宣传准备材料,并培训工作人员如何使用传播工具。

结论

这些发现将为“我们所有人”的沟通策略、内容、材料和工作人员培训资源提供参考,以便有效地将数据故事作为对参与者的价值回报进行传达。

相似文献

1
Communicating research findings as a return of value to All of Us Research Program participants: insights from staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers.将研究结果作为对“我们所有人的研究计划”参与者的价值回报进行沟通:来自联邦合格健康中心工作人员的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2962-2967. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae207.
2
Leveraging an implementation science partnership network to understand how Federally Qualified Health Centers operationalize and address health equity.利用实施科学伙伴关系网络了解联邦合格健康中心如何实施和解决公平问题。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):23-33. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad046.
3
Communicating a Complicated Medicaid Waiver Program to Enrollees in Iowa: How Federally Qualified Health Centers Support Medicaid Members.向爱荷华州的医疗补助受保人传达复杂的医疗补助豁免计划:合格的联邦健康中心如何支持医疗补助成员。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2021 Jan/Mar;44(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000359.
4
Understanding the use of CATI and web-based data collection methods during the pandemic among digitally challenged groups at FQHCs: data from the Research Program.了解在疫情期间社区卫生中心(FQHCs)中数字技术使用困难群体对计算机辅助电话调查(CATI)和基于网络的数据收集方法的应用:来自研究项目的数据
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jun 4;6:1379290. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1379290. eCollection 2024.
5
Experiences of Telehealth Reimbursement Policies in Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格健康中心的远程医疗报销政策经验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2459554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59554.
6
Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study.在联邦合格健康中心中,将结直肠癌筛查外展与社会风险筛查捆绑在一起:一项递进式实施有效性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(7):1188-1195. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08654-5. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Federally Qualified Health Centers' Capacity and Readiness for Research Collaborations: Implications for Clinical-Academic-Community Partnerships.联邦合格健康中心开展研究合作的能力与准备情况:对临床 - 学术 - 社区伙伴关系的影响
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):391-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12272. Epub 2015 May 11.
8
Building research capacity at FQHCs: A model of support from the Research Program.提升社区健康中心的研究能力:研究项目的支持模式
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 13;7(1):e148. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.571. eCollection 2023.
9
Determinants of Bluetooth-Enabled Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Federally Qualified Health Centers.蓝牙功能自我血压监测在联邦合格健康中心的决定因素。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241229921. doi: 10.1177/21501319241229921.
10
Barriers to and facilitators of implementing colorectal cancer screening evidence-based interventions in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study.在联邦合格健康中心实施结直肠癌筛查循证干预的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11163-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Returning value to communities from the All of Us Research Program through innovative approaches for data use, analysis, dissemination, and research capacity building.通过创新的数据使用、分析、传播和研究能力建设方法,将价值回馈给“我们所有人”研究计划中的各个社区。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2773-2780. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae276.

本文引用的文献

1
Building research capacity at FQHCs: A model of support from the Research Program.提升社区健康中心的研究能力:研究项目的支持模式
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 13;7(1):e148. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.571. eCollection 2023.
2
Modeling the impact of digital readiness in recruiting and sustaining underrepresented groups: Data from the research program.模拟数字准备情况对招募和留住代表性不足群体的影响:来自研究项目的数据。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Apr 13;4:1082098. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1082098. eCollection 2022.
3
Sharing research results with Latina breast cancer survivors who participated in a community-engaged behavioral RCT study: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.与参与社区参与行为 RCT 研究的拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者分享研究结果:描述性横断面调查研究。
Trials. 2022 Jan 8;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05945-8.
4
Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: Formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences.向研究参与者传达和传播研究结果:对参与者和研究人员期望与偏好的形成性评估。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):233-242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.9.
5
Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review.《全民研究计划的多样性和包容性:范围综述》。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234962. eCollection 2020.
6
The "All of Us" Research Program.“All of Us”研究计划。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937.
7
Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.理解研究参与者看重的信息是什么,以及为什么。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):399-407. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05046.
8
Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.关于研究传播的参与者认知与偏好的定性研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.