• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向研究参与者传达和传播研究结果:对参与者和研究人员期望与偏好的形成性评估。

Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: Formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences.

作者信息

Melvin Cathy L, Harvey Jillian, Pittman Tara, Gentilin Stephanie, Burshell Dana, Kelechi Teresa

机构信息

College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

College of Health Professions/Healthcare Leadership & Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):233-242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.9.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2020.9
PMID:32695495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348011/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Translating research findings into practice requires understanding how to meet communication and dissemination needs and preferences of intended audiences including past research participants (PSPs) who want, but seldom receive, information on research findings during or after participating in research studies. Most researchers want to let others, including PSP, know about their findings but lack knowledge about how to effectively communicate findings to a lay audience.

METHODS

We designed a two-phase, mixed methods pilot study to understand experiences, expectations, concerns, preferences, and capacities of researchers and PSP in two age groups (adolescents/young adults (AYA) or older adults) and to test communication prototypes for sharing, receiving, and using information on research study findings.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

PSP and researchers agreed that sharing study findings should happen and that doing so could improve participant recruitment and enrollment, use of research findings to improve health and health-care delivery, and build community support for research. Some differences and similarities in communication preferences and message format were identified between PSP groups, reinforcing the best practice of customizing communication channel and messaging. Researchers wanted specific training and/or time and resources to help them prepare messages in formats to meet PSP needs and preferences but were unaware of resources to help them do so.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings offer insight into how to engage both PSP and researchers in the design and use of strategies to share research findings and highlight the need to develop services and support for researchers as they aim to bridge this translational barrier.

摘要

引言

将研究成果转化为实践需要了解如何满足目标受众的沟通与传播需求及偏好,这些目标受众包括过去的研究参与者(PSP),他们希望在参与研究期间或之后获得研究结果的信息,但很少能如愿。大多数研究人员希望让包括PSP在内的其他人了解他们的研究结果,但缺乏如何有效地向普通受众传达研究结果的知识。

方法

我们设计了一项两阶段的混合方法试点研究,以了解两个年龄组(青少年/青年(AYA)或老年人)的研究人员和PSP的经历、期望、担忧、偏好和能力,并测试用于分享、接收和使用研究结果信息的沟通原型。

主要结果

PSP和研究人员一致认为应该分享研究结果,这样做可以改善参与者的招募和入组情况,利用研究结果改善健康和医疗服务,并建立社区对研究的支持。在PSP群体之间发现了沟通偏好和信息格式方面的一些差异和相似之处,这强化了定制沟通渠道和信息的最佳实践。研究人员希望获得特定的培训和/或时间及资源,以帮助他们以满足PSP需求和偏好的格式准备信息,但不知道有哪些资源可以帮助他们这样做。

结论

我们的研究结果为如何让PSP和研究人员参与设计和使用分享研究结果的策略提供了见解,并强调在研究人员旨在跨越这一转化障碍时,需要为他们开发服务和支持。

相似文献

1
Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: Formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences.向研究参与者传达和传播研究结果:对参与者和研究人员期望与偏好的形成性评估。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):233-242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.9.
2
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.研究参与者的研究结果返还:数据访问、格式和共享偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Exploring bi-directional and SMS messaging for communications between Public Health Agencies and their stakeholders: a qualitative study.探索公共卫生机构与其利益相关者之间通信的双向和短信消息传递:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 8;15:621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1980-2.
7
Characterizing health researcher barriers to sharing results with study participants.描述健康研究人员在与研究参与者分享结果方面所面临的障碍。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;3(6):295-301. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.409. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
What do adolescents and young adults want from cancer resources? Insights from a Delphi panel of AYA patients.青少年和青年成年人希望从癌症资源中获得什么?来自青少年和青年成年人患者德尔菲小组的见解。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3396-7. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
10
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative insights from an online community-based exercise intervention for persons living with HIV.一项针对艾滋病毒感染者的基于在线社区的运动干预的定性见解。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Aug 25;6:1602007. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1602007. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing Requirements for a Standardized System to Return Individual Research Results Back to Study Participants: Narrative Review.制定将个体研究结果反馈给研究参与者的标准化系统的要求:叙述性综述。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Aug 18;14:e65606. doi: 10.2196/65606.
3
Challenges and needs of nurse researchers on research publication in health universities of Karnataka, India: a cross-sectional survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science.传播知识:公共卫生科学传播的新途径。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):102-111. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673.
2
Dissemination as Dialogue: Building Trust and Sharing Research Findings Through Community Engagement.作为对话的传播:通过社区参与建立信任并分享研究成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Mar 17;13:E38. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150473.
3
Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence.促进健康相关证据使用的沟通与传播策略。
印度卡纳塔克邦健康大学护理研究人员在研究发表方面面临的挑战与需求:一项横断面调查
J Res Nurs. 2025 Aug 14:17449871251347840. doi: 10.1177/17449871251347840.
4
Advancing the impact of research through a dissemination-focused special interest group.通过一个专注于传播的特殊兴趣小组提高研究的影响力。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 27;15(4):e098130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098130.
5
Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.向参与者反馈个人可穿戴传感器的结果:关于挑战和经验教训的观点
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;7:1569452. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1569452. eCollection 2025.
6
Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.向老年研究参与者反馈个性化可穿戴传感器结果:一项试点研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf027.
7
Communicating research findings as a return of value to All of Us Research Program participants: insights from staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers.将研究结果作为对“我们所有人的研究计划”参与者的价值回报进行沟通:来自联邦合格健康中心工作人员的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2962-2967. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae207.
8
Dissemination innovation: Using found poetry to return study results to patients and partners facing cancer.传播创新:运用“现成诗”将研究结果反馈给面临癌症的患者及合作伙伴。
PEC Innov. 2024 May 7;4:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100286. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Diversity, equity, inclusion, and access are necessary for clinical trial site readiness.多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性对于临床试验场地准备工作而言是必要的。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 30;7(1):e268. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.660. eCollection 2023.
10
Diversity, equity, and inclusivity in observational ambulatory assessment: Recommendations from two decades of Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) research.观察性门诊评估中的多样性、公平性和包容性:电子激活记录器 (EAR) 研究二十年的建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3207-3225. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02293-0. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013 Nov(213):1-520. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta213.
4
Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions.比较有效性证据的传播和实施:对临床和转化科学奖机构的关键知情人的访谈。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Mar;2(2):185-94. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.10.
5
Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks.传播研究成果:研究人员应该怎么做?概念框架的系统范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 22;5:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91.
6
The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants.在向研究参与者传达研究结果时力求清晰明了。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):e17. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025122.
7
Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.向参与者传达临床研究结果:态度、做法及未来方向。
PLoS Med. 2008 May 13;5(5):e91. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050091.
8
Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.披露什么的义务?质疑向参与者返还研究结果的假定义务。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):210-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020289.
9
Clinical and translational science awards: a framework for a national research agenda.临床与转化科学奖:国家研究议程框架
Transl Res. 2006 Jul;148(1):4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2006.05.001.
10
Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results?参与临床试验的患者想知道研究结果吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 19;95(6):491-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.6.491.