• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨化学和生物学课程检验和支持机械论解释

Examining and Supporting Mechanistic Explanations Across Chemistry and Biology Courses.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.

Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar38. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-08-0157.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.23-08-0157
PMID:39172965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440742/
Abstract

Causal mechanistic reasoning is a thinking strategy that can help students explain complex phenomena using core ideas commonly emphasized in separate undergraduate courses, as it requires students to identify underlying entities, unpack their relevant properties and interactions, and link them to construct mechanistic explanations. As a crossdisciplinary group of biologists, chemists, and teacher educators, we designed a scaffolded set of tasks that require content knowledge from biology and chemistry to construct nested hierarchical mechanistic explanations that span three scales (molecular, macromolecular, and cellular). We examined student explanations across seven introductory and upper-level biology and chemistry courses to determine how the construction of mechanistic explanations varied across courses and the relationship between the construction of mechanistic explanations at different scales. We found non-, partial, and complete mechanistic explanations in all courses and at each scale. Complete mechanistic explanation construction was lowest in introductory chemistry, about the same across biology and organic chemistry, and highest in biochemistry. Across tasks, the construction of a mechanistic explanation at a smaller scale was associated with constructing a mechanistic explanation for larger scales; however, the use of molecular scale disciplinary resources was only associated with complete mechanistic explanations at the macromolecular, not cellular scale.

摘要

因果机制推理是一种思维策略,它可以帮助学生使用在单独的本科课程中经常强调的核心思想来解释复杂现象,因为它要求学生识别潜在的实体,分解它们的相关属性和相互作用,并将它们联系起来构建机械解释。作为一个由生物学家、化学家以及教师教育工作者组成的跨学科小组,我们设计了一系列有脚手架的任务,这些任务需要生物学和化学方面的知识来构建嵌套的层次化机械解释,涵盖三个尺度(分子、大分子和细胞)。我们检查了七个入门和高级生物学和化学课程中学生的解释,以确定机械解释的构建如何在课程之间有所不同,以及不同尺度之间机械解释的构建之间的关系。我们在所有课程和每个尺度上都发现了非完整、部分和完整的机械解释。完整的机械解释构建在入门化学中最低,在生物学和有机化学中大致相同,在生物化学中最高。在整个任务中,在较小尺度上构建机械解释与在较大尺度上构建机械解释相关;然而,在大分子而不是细胞尺度上,对分子尺度学科资源的使用仅与完整的机械解释相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/8417592338ef/cbe-23-ar38-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/f8ea8011d892/cbe-23-ar38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/5310b8f55f46/cbe-23-ar38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/5f7074aa2589/cbe-23-ar38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/55c051f90b22/cbe-23-ar38-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/9b820eba6e7b/cbe-23-ar38-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/6cac3e732feb/cbe-23-ar38-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/86303127f544/cbe-23-ar38-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/8417592338ef/cbe-23-ar38-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/f8ea8011d892/cbe-23-ar38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/5310b8f55f46/cbe-23-ar38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/5f7074aa2589/cbe-23-ar38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/55c051f90b22/cbe-23-ar38-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/9b820eba6e7b/cbe-23-ar38-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/6cac3e732feb/cbe-23-ar38-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/86303127f544/cbe-23-ar38-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb5/11440742/8417592338ef/cbe-23-ar38-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining and Supporting Mechanistic Explanations Across Chemistry and Biology Courses.跨化学和生物学课程检验和支持机械论解释
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar38. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-08-0157.
2
"Big Ideas" of Introductory Chemistry and Biology Courses and the Connections between Them.《基础化学与生物学课程的“大理念”及其相互联系》
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;21(2):ar35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-10-0301.
3
Energy Connections and Misconnections across Chemistry and Biology.能源在化学和生物学中的连接和错位。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0169.
4
What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.他们在想什么?关于基础生物学中酸碱化学的学生写作的自动化分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):283-93. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0084.
5
Connecting Structure-Property and Structure-Function Relationships across the Disciplines of Chemistry and Biology: Exploring Student Perceptions.连接化学和生物学学科的结构-性质和结构-功能关系:探索学生的认知。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar33. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-01-0004.
6
Developing an Analytical Framework to Characterize Student Reasoning about Complex Processes.发展一个分析框架,以刻画学生对复杂过程的推理。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):ar49. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-10-0225.
7
Connecting biology and organic chemistry introductory laboratory courses through a collaborative research project.通过一个合作研究项目将生物学与有机化学入门实验室课程联系起来。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;43(4):233-44. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20871. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: positive relationships with long-term student achievement.以学生为中心的本科生物学探究式学习:与学生长期学业成就呈正相关。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):462-72. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-02-0011.
9
Students' use of chemistry core ideas to explain the structure and stability of DNA.学生们运用化学核心观念解释 DNA 的结构和稳定性。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jan;49(1):55-68. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21391. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
A fully integrated undergraduate introductory biology and chemistry course with a community-based focus II: Assessment of course effectiveness.以社区为基础重点的综合性本科生物学和化学入门课程 II:课程效果评估。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Sep;49(5):737-747. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21555. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do Instructors Explain The Mechanism by which ATP Drives Unfavorable Processes?教师如何解释 ATP 驱动不利过程的机制?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar50. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-05-0071.
2
Putting the Pieces Together: Student Thinking about Transformations of Energy and Matter.拼拼凑凑:学生思考能量和物质的转化。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-11-0264.
3
Design and Implementation of a Tool to Assess Students' Understanding of Metabolic Pathways Dynamics and Regulation.设计并实现一种工具,以评估学生对代谢途径动态和调控的理解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Sep;20(3):ar35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0078.
4
Students' use of chemistry core ideas to explain the structure and stability of DNA.学生们运用化学核心观念解释 DNA 的结构和稳定性。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jan;49(1):55-68. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21391. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
Advancing the Guidance Debate: Lessons from Educational Psychology and Implications for Biochemistry Learning.推进指导辩论:教育心理学的教训及其对生物化学学习的启示。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;19(3):ar41. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0260.
6
Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio): An Introductory Laboratory Curriculum That Increases Undergraduates' Scientific Agency and Skills.生物学中的真实探究建模(AIM-Bio):一个提高本科生科学能动性和技能的入门实验室课程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-06-0090.
7
Evaluating the extent of a large-scale transformation in gateway science courses.评估基础科学课程大规模变革的程度。
Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 24;4(10):eaau0554. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau0554. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Student difficulties during structure-function problem solving.学生在解决结构-功能问题过程中遇到的困难。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018 Sep;46(5):453-463. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21166.
9
Developing an Analytical Framework to Characterize Student Reasoning about Complex Processes.发展一个分析框架,以刻画学生对复杂过程的推理。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):ar49. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-10-0225.
10
Connecting Structure-Property and Structure-Function Relationships across the Disciplines of Chemistry and Biology: Exploring Student Perceptions.连接化学和生物学学科的结构-性质和结构-功能关系:探索学生的认知。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar33. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-01-0004.