• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告指标调查(PaRIS)概念框架的开发,用于监测和改善慢性病患者的初级保健服务绩效。

Development of the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) conceptual framework to monitor and improve the performance of primary care for people living with chronic conditions.

作者信息

Valderas Jose M, Porter Ian, Martin-Delgado Jimmy, Rijken Mieke, de Jong Judith, Groene Oliver, Bloemeke-Cammin Janika, Sunol Rosa, Williams Rachel, Ballester Marta, de Bienassis Katherine, Kendir Candan, Guanais Frederico, de Boer Dolf, van den Berg Michael

机构信息

Department of Health & Community Sciences, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Centre for Research in Health Systems Performance, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18;34(8):529-536. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017301.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017301
PMID:39174334
Abstract

UNLABELLED

BackgroundThe Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) initiative aims to support countries in improving care for people living with chronic conditions by collecting information on how people experience the quality and performance of primary and (generalist) ambulatory care services. This paper presents the development of the conceptual framework that underpins the rationale for and the instrumentation of the PaRIS survey.

METHODS

The guidance of an international expert taskforce and the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators framework (2015) provided initial specifications for the framework. Relevant conceptual models and frameworks were then identified from searches in bibliographic databases (Medline, EMBASE and the Health Management Information Consortium). A draft framework was developed through narrative review. The final version was codeveloped following the participation of an international Patient advisory Panel, an international Technical Advisory Community and online international workshops with patient representatives.

RESULTS

85 conceptual models and frameworks were identified through searches. The final framework maps relationships between the following domains (and subdomains): patient-reported outcomes (symptoms, functioning, self-reported health status, health-related quality of life); patient-reported experiences of care (access, comprehensiveness, continuity, coordination, patient safety, person centeredness, self-management support, trust, overall perceived quality of care); health and care capabilities; health behaviours (physical activity, diet, tobacco and alcohol consumption), sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported chronic conditions; delivery system characteristics (clinic, main healthcare professional); health system, policy and context.

DISCUSSION

The PaRIS conceptual framework has been developed through a systematic, accountable and inclusive process. It serves as the basis for the development of the indicators and survey instruments as well as for the generation of specific hypotheses to guide the analysis and interpretation of the findings.

摘要

未标注

背景

经济合作与发展组织(OECD)患者报告指标调查(PaRIS)倡议旨在通过收集人们对初级和(全科)门诊护理服务质量及绩效体验的信息,支持各国改善慢性病患者的护理。本文介绍了支撑PaRIS调查基本原理和工具的概念框架的制定过程。

方法

国际专家工作组的指导意见以及经合组织医疗质量指标框架(2015年)为该框架提供了初始规范。随后通过在书目数据库(Medline、EMBASE和健康管理信息联盟)中检索,确定了相关的概念模型和框架。通过叙述性综述制定了框架草案。最终版本是在国际患者咨询小组、国际技术咨询社区参与以及与患者代表举行的在线国际研讨会之后共同制定的。

结果

通过检索确定了85个概念模型和框架。最终框架描绘了以下领域(及子领域)之间的关系:患者报告的结果(症状、功能、自我报告的健康状况、健康相关生活质量);患者报告的护理体验(可及性、全面性、连续性、协调性、患者安全、以患者为中心、自我管理支持、信任、总体感知护理质量);健康和护理能力;健康行为(身体活动、饮食、烟草和酒精消费)、社会人口学特征和自我报告的慢性病;提供系统特征(诊所、主要医疗保健专业人员);卫生系统、政策和背景。

讨论

PaRIS概念框架是通过系统、可问责和包容的过程制定的。它作为指标和调查工具开发的基础,以及生成特定假设以指导研究结果分析和解释的基础。

相似文献

1
Development of the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) conceptual framework to monitor and improve the performance of primary care for people living with chronic conditions.患者报告指标调查(PaRIS)概念框架的开发,用于监测和改善慢性病患者的初级保健服务绩效。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18;34(8):529-536. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017301.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者预后的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
6
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.接受透析治疗并等待已故捐赠者肾脏移植的成年人的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1973.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent use and association of patient-reported experience and outcome measures in psychiatric and substance use disorder care: a scoping review.精神疾病和物质使用障碍护理中患者报告的体验与结局测量的同时使用及关联:一项范围综述
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 30;5:1620809. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1620809. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): A Study of Factor and Rasch Analyses.长期病症调查问卷(LTCQ)阿拉伯语版本的验证:一项因素分析和拉施分析研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131485.
3
The Interconnection Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Diet: Unmet Needs, Available Evidence, and Guidance-A Patient-Driven, Multistep-Approach Study.
系统性红斑狼疮与饮食之间的关联:未满足的需求、现有证据及指导——一项患者驱动的多步骤方法研究
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 29;16(23):4132. doi: 10.3390/nu16234132.
4
International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data.国际慢性病患者调查(PaRIS 调查):全科医生不参与对挪威患者数据代表性的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11751-0.