• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合差距:支持和指导学员构思、规划并整合有生活经历者参与健康研究的相关事宜。

Bridging the divide: supporting and mentoring trainees to conceptualize, plan, and integrate engagement of people with lived experience in health research.

作者信息

Chan Carusone Soo, D'Amore Cassandra, Dighe Subhash, Dingman Lance, Falbo A Tina, Kirk Michael, Luyckx Joyce, McNeil Mark, Nolan Kim, Petrie Penelope, Weldon Donna, Ganann Rebecca, Vrkljan Brenda

机构信息

McMaster Collaborative for Health and Aging, 1400 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, & Impact, McMaster University, HSC2C 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 22;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00625-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00625-8
PMID:39175084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11342555/
Abstract

Health researchers are encouraged by governments, funders, and journals to conduct research in partnership with people with lived experience. However, conducting research with authentic engagement and partnership with those who are experts by experience, but may not have research methods training, requires resources and specialized skills. The McMaster Collaborative for Health and Aging developed a fellowship program for trainees that builds their capacity to conduct research in partnership with older adults with relevant lived experience. We share this case example, with its successes and challenges, to encourage creative reformation of traditional research training.The Collaborative used an iterative design process, involving researchers, trainees and older adult and caregiver partners, who, together, developed a fellowship program for trainees that provides support and mentorship to plan and conduct health research in partnership with people with lived experience.Since 2022, the Partnership in Research Fellowship has been offered biannually. The application process was purposefully designed to be both constructive and supportive. Opportunities for one-on-one consultations; key resources, including a guide for developing a plan to involve people with relevant lived experience; and feedback from older adult and researcher reviewers are provided to all applicants. Successful trainees engage with older adult and caregiver partners from the Collaborative to advance and enhance a range of skills from facilitating partner meetings to forming advisory committees. Trainees are awarded $1500 CAD to foster reciprocal partnerships. Ten graduate students from various disciplines have participated. Trainees reported positive impacts on their knowledge, comfort, and approach to partnered research. However, the time required for undertaking partnered research activities and involving diverse partners remain obstacles to meaningful engagement.Partnering with people with lived experience in the design of educational programs embeds the principles of partnership and can increase the value and reward for all involved. We share the Partnership in Research Fellowship as a case example to inspire new and transformative approaches in research training and mentorship that will move the field forward from engagement theory to meaningful enactment.

摘要

政府、资助者和期刊鼓励健康研究人员与有实际生活经验的人合作开展研究。然而,要与那些有经验的专家(但可能没有接受过研究方法培训)进行真正的参与和合作研究,需要资源和专业技能。麦克马斯特健康与老龄化协作中心为学员开发了一个奖学金项目,以培养他们与有相关实际生活经验的老年人合作开展研究的能力。我们分享这个案例,包括其成功之处和挑战,以鼓励对传统研究培训进行创造性改革。该协作中心采用了迭代设计过程,让研究人员、学员以及老年和护理人员伙伴共同参与,他们一起为学员制定了一个奖学金项目,为与有实际生活经验的人合作规划和开展健康研究提供支持和指导。自2022年以来,研究伙伴关系奖学金每两年提供一次。申请过程经过精心设计,既具有建设性又具有支持性。为所有申请人提供一对一咨询机会、关键资源(包括制定让有相关实际生活经验的人参与计划的指南)以及老年和研究人员评审员的反馈。成功的学员与协作中心的老年和护理人员伙伴合作,提升一系列技能,从组织伙伴会议到组建咨询委员会。学员可获得1500加元奖励,以促进互惠合作关系。来自不同学科的10名研究生参与其中。学员们报告说,这对他们在合作研究方面的知识、舒适度和方法产生了积极影响。然而,开展合作研究活动所需的时间以及涉及不同伙伴的问题仍然是进行有意义参与的障碍。在教育项目设计中与有实际生活经验的人合作,体现了合作原则,并能增加所有参与者的价值和回报。我们分享研究伙伴关系奖学金这个案例,以激发研究培训和指导方面新的变革性方法,推动该领域从参与理论迈向有意义的实践。

相似文献

1
Bridging the divide: supporting and mentoring trainees to conceptualize, plan, and integrate engagement of people with lived experience in health research.弥合差距:支持和指导学员构思、规划并整合有生活经历者参与健康研究的相关事宜。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 22;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00625-8.
2
Co-designing a participatory evaluation of older adult partner engagement in the mcmaster collaborative for health and aging.共同设计一项关于老年人伴侣参与麦克马斯特健康与老龄化协作项目的参与式评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00595-x.
3
Development of the Strengths, Skills, and Goals Matrix: a tool for facilitating strengths-based adolescent and young adult engagement in research.优势、技能和目标矩阵的开发:一种促进基于优势的青少年和青年参与研究的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 4;9(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00502-w.
4
Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research.共同设计模拟并分析过程,以确定儿童残疾研究中真实且有意义的研究参与原则。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 9;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y.
5
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
6
"": Developing individuals with lived-experience of health and social care as facilitators to deliver a course to enhance public involvement in research - a Welsh perspective.利用有健康和社会护理生活经历的个人作为促进者来开展一门课程,以增强公众对研究的参与——威尔士视角。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 4;3:5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0057-z. eCollection 2017.
7
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.
8
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.通过经验探索与年轻伙伴建立研究合作关系的“方式”:从加拿大、荷兰和英国的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00400-7.
9
Delivery and evaluation of simulations to promote authentic and meaningful engagement in childhood disability research.提供和评估模拟,以促进在儿童残疾研究中进行真实且有意义的参与。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 18;9(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00468-9.
10
Development, implementation, and scalability of the Family Engagement in Research Course: a novel online course for family partners and researchers in neurodevelopmental disability and child health.研究中的家庭参与课程的开发、实施与可扩展性:面向神经发育障碍和儿童健康领域家庭伙伴及研究人员的新型在线课程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 5;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00615-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections on patient engagement by patient partners: how it can go wrong.患者合作伙伴对患者参与的反思:可能出现的问题。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 12;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00454-1.
2
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.
3
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
4
Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.将患者概念化为卫生系统的合作伙伴:系统评价和描述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8.
5
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.患者和研究人员对初级保健医疗研究中患者参与的体验:一项参与式定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2365-2376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13542. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry: How the search for epistemic justifications obscures ethical considerations.衡量精神病学参与式研究的影响:寻找认识论理由如何掩盖伦理考虑。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/hex.12988. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Engaging patients and the public in Health Research: experiences, perceptions and training needs among Manitoba health researchers.让患者和公众参与健康研究:曼尼托巴省健康研究人员的经验、看法和培训需求
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Oct 8;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0162-2. eCollection 2019.
9
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Lived experience researchers partnering with consumers and carers to improve mental health research: Reflections from an Australian initiative.与消费者和护理人员合作的生活体验研究人员改善精神健康研究:来自澳大利亚的一项倡议的反思。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(4):1219-1229. doi: 10.1111/inm.12482. Epub 2018 May 30.