• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个包含研究、商业和软件开发的数字健康敏捷项目中实施患者和公众参与所面临的挑战。

Challenges Implementing Patient and Public Involvement in a Digital Health Agile Project Which Includes Research, Business and Software Development.

机构信息

University of Oulu, Finland.

Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:310-314. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240406.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI240406
PMID:39176735
Abstract

Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a practice for involving future users in the design, development, and research of health technologies. There is increasing interest and demand for PPI, but little evidence based methodological support for integrating PPI in agile development processes. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic condition that severely impacts the lives of patients and requires active patient involvement. In this paper, we present the results of a case study, examining the adoption and integration of PPI into the development of a digital therapeutics solution for MS. The results highlight five critical phases that proved to be challenging: selecting patient participants, onboarding of patient participants and employees, framing tasks for patient participants, communication between patient participants and the rest of the development team, and reimbursements. The results are useful in creating evidence-based guidelines and methods for supporting the adoption of PPI.

摘要

患者和公众参与(PPI)是一种让未来用户参与健康技术设计、开发和研究的实践。人们对 PPI 的兴趣和需求日益增加,但在将 PPI 纳入敏捷开发过程方面,缺乏基于证据的方法支持。多发性硬化症(MS)是一种严重影响患者生活的慢性疾病,需要积极的患者参与。在本文中,我们介绍了一项案例研究的结果,该研究考察了将 PPI 纳入用于治疗多发性硬化症的数字治疗方案的开发过程中的采用和整合情况。研究结果突出了五个具有挑战性的关键阶段:选择患者参与者、患者参与者和员工的入职、为患者参与者设定任务、患者参与者与开发团队其他成员之间的沟通以及报销。这些结果对于制定支持 PPI 采用的循证指南和方法非常有用。

相似文献

1
Challenges Implementing Patient and Public Involvement in a Digital Health Agile Project Which Includes Research, Business and Software Development.在一个包含研究、商业和软件开发的数字健康敏捷项目中实施患者和公众参与所面临的挑战。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:310-314. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240406.
2
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
3
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.有意义的患者和公众参与数字健康创新、实施和评估:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13506. Epub 2022 May 8.
4
Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map.患者和公众参与 HIV 研究:一项制图综述及在线证据图谱的开发。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Nov;27(11):e26385. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26385.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Public and patient involvement (PPI) in the design, execution and dissemination of a trial: the BISTRO trial.公众和患者参与(PPI)在一项试验的设计、实施和传播中的应用:BISTRO试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jan 29:1-18. doi: 10.3310/DOTR5903.
7
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
10
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件:借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Components of Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions: Nominal Group Technique and Feasibility Study.数字健康解决方案参与式设计研讨会的关键组成部分:名义群体技术与可行性研究。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2025 May 14;9(3):359-379. doi: 10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4. eCollection 2025 Sep.