• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康解决方案参与式设计研讨会的关键组成部分:名义群体技术与可行性研究。

Key Components of Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions: Nominal Group Technique and Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Denecke Kerstin, Rivera-Romero Octavio, Giunti Guido, Van Holten Karin, Gabarron Elia

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Institute Patient-Centered Digital Health, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Quellgasse 21, Biel, 2502 Switzerland.

Electronic Technology Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Healthc Inform Res. 2025 May 14;9(3):359-379. doi: 10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4
PMID:40726748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12290142/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Participatory design (PD) is an essential method in the development of digital health solutions since it promises to increase acceptance, usability, and trust in the developed solution. Although careful planning and preparation is crucial for the success of PD workshops, a framework of key components to consider is still missing. The objective of this work is to develop such framework enriched with examples for aspects to be considered when planning and conducting PD workshops for designing and developing digital interventions in healthcare. We applied the nominal group technique with four participants with backgrounds in computer science, health informatics, psychology, and social anthropology to identify key components of PD workshops. The resulting framework was applied by an expert in PD to a case of a digital health solution for fatigue self-management for multiple sclerosis. The feasibility and applicability of the framework and its shortcomings were assessed. As a result, a framework consisting of five main categories and a total of 36 factors were assigned and defined in relation to the categories. The categories are participatory process, involved persons and their roles, workshop definition, setting, privacy and ethics, including regulations. The application of the framework to the test case demonstrated the feasibility and applicability of the suggested framework as well as the shortcomings of the analyzed PD process. This framework provides practical guidance while highlighting the complexity of PD workshops, encouraging their broad adoption, critical reflection, and continuous refinement. It has potential to improve the conduct of PD workshops and, in this way, potential to improve usability, acceptance, and usefulness of digital health solutions. In future work, the user perspective could be used to extend the framework.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4.

摘要

未标注

参与式设计(PD)是数字健康解决方案开发中的一种重要方法,因为它有望提高对所开发解决方案的接受度、可用性和信任度。尽管精心规划和准备对于PD研讨会的成功至关重要,但仍缺少一个关键组成部分的框架。这项工作的目的是开发这样一个框架,并为在医疗保健领域设计和开发数字干预措施的PD研讨会的规划和实施中需要考虑的方面提供示例。我们对四名具有计算机科学、健康信息学、心理学和社会人类学背景的参与者应用了名义小组技术,以确定PD研讨会的关键组成部分。一位PD专家将所得框架应用于一个针对多发性硬化症疲劳自我管理的数字健康解决方案案例。评估了该框架的可行性、适用性及其缺点。结果,分配并定义了一个由五个主要类别组成的框架,总共36个因素与这些类别相关。这些类别是参与过程、相关人员及其角色、研讨会定义、环境、隐私和伦理,包括法规。该框架在测试案例中的应用证明了所建议框架的可行性和适用性以及所分析的PD过程的缺点。该框架提供了实用指导,同时突出了PD研讨会的复杂性,鼓励广泛采用、批判性反思和持续改进。它有可能改善PD研讨会的开展,从而有可能提高数字健康解决方案的可用性、接受度和实用性。在未来的工作中,可以从用户角度扩展该框架。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e354/12290142/b885cb0be960/41666_2025_199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e354/12290142/b885cb0be960/41666_2025_199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e354/12290142/b885cb0be960/41666_2025_199_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Key Components of Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions: Nominal Group Technique and Feasibility Study.数字健康解决方案参与式设计研讨会的关键组成部分:名义群体技术与可行性研究。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2025 May 14;9(3):359-379. doi: 10.1007/s41666-025-00199-4. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Co-Design of a Depression Self-Management Tool for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach.青少年和青年癌症幸存者抑郁症自我管理工具的协同设计:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 24;9:e67175. doi: 10.2196/67175.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and usability evaluation of a gamified fatigue management mobile application for persons with multiple sclerosis in everyday life.针对日常生活中的多发性硬化症患者的一款游戏化疲劳管理移动应用程序的可行性和可用性评估。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025 May;97:106379. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2025.106379. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
Technology use and interest in digital apps for mental health promotion and lifestyle intervention among young adults with serious mental illness.患有严重精神疾病的年轻人对用于促进心理健康和生活方式干预的数字应用程序的技术使用情况及兴趣。
J Affect Disord Rep. 2021 Dec;6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100227. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
3
A rapid review of digital approaches for the participatory development of health-related interventions.
对用于参与式制定健康相关干预措施的数字方法的快速综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;12:1461422. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1461422. eCollection 2024.
4
Challenges Implementing Patient and Public Involvement in a Digital Health Agile Project Which Includes Research, Business and Software Development.在一个包含研究、商业和软件开发的数字健康敏捷项目中实施患者和公众参与所面临的挑战。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:310-314. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240406.
5
Participatory Design in Suicide Prevention: A Qualitative Study of International Students' Experiences of Adapting the LivingWorks safeTALK Programme.参与式设计在预防自杀中的应用:一项关于留学生适应 LivingWorks safeTALK 项目的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14164. doi: 10.1111/hex.14164.
6
Digital health technologies and inequalities: A scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations.数字健康技术与不平等:潜在影响与政策建议的范围综述。
Health Policy. 2024 Aug;146:105122. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Exploring the Evolution of Social Media in Mental Health Interventions: A Mapping Review.探索社交媒体在心理健康干预中的演变:一项映射综述。
Yearb Med Inform. 2023 Aug;32(1):152-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768730. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
Participation through the lens of care: Situated accountabilities in the codesign of a digital health platform for HIV care.通过关怀的视角参与:在 HIV 护理数字健康平台的共同设计中体现的责任。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Nov;337:116307. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116307. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Maximizing the value of patient and public involvement in the digital health co-design process: A qualitative descriptive study with design leaders and patient-public partners.最大化患者和公众参与数字健康协同设计过程的价值:一项针对设计领导者和患者-公众合作伙伴的定性描述性研究
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 25;2(10):e0000213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000213. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
An emerging framework for digital mental health design with Indigenous young people: a scoping review of the involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions.一个新兴的数字心理健康设计框架:一项针对原住民青年参与数字心理健康干预措施设计和评估的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 1;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02262-w.