Chien Ching-Hui, Chuang Cheng-Keng, Wu Chun-Te, Pang See-Tong, Liu Kuan-Lin, Yu Kai-Jie
College of Nursing, Peitou District, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, No.365, Ming-Te Road, Taipei City, 112, Taiwan.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024 Aug 23;37(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00317-y.
The reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Cancer Survivors' Self-Efficacy Scale (CS-SES-TC) has not been assessed.
To assess the psychometric properties of the Traditional Chinese version of the CS-SES-TC.
Participants were recruited from the outpatient departments of a hospital in Taiwan. A single questionnaire was administered to 300 genitourinary cancer survivors. The scales included in the initial questionnaire were the CS-SES-TC, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale (FACT-G). Data obtained from 300 survivors were used to confirm the structure through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
The CFA results indicate that the 11-item CS-SES-TC is consistent with the original scale. Furthermore, it was identified as a unidimensional scale, with the model showing acceptable goodness-of-fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.97). The factor loading of each item in the CS-SES-TC was above 0.6 and had convergent validity. Based on multiple-group CFA testing, the change (ΔCFI) between the unconstrained and constrained models was ≤ 0.01, indicating that measurement invariance holds for gender. The participants' CS-SES-TC scores were positively correlated with their FACT-G scores and negatively correlated with their CES-D scores. The scales exhibited concurrent validity and discriminant validity. The CS-SES-TC had a Cronbach's α in the range of .97-.98.
The CS-SES-TC had acceptable reliability and validity. Healthcare workers can use this scale for ongoing assessment of the cancer-related self-efficacy of cancer survivors.
癌症幸存者自我效能感量表中文版（CS - SES - TC）的信效度尚未得到评估。
评估CS - SES - TC中文版的心理测量学特性。
研究对象从台湾一家医院的门诊招募。对300名泌尿生殖系统癌症幸存者发放单一问卷。初始问卷中的量表包括CS - SES - TC、一般自我效能感量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES - D）以及癌症治疗功能评估通用量表（FACT - G）。从300名幸存者获得的数据用于通过验证性因子分析（CFA）来确认结构。
CFA结果表明，11项的CS - SES - TC与原量表一致。此外，它被确定为单维量表，模型显示出可接受的拟合优度（CFI = 0.99，TLI = 0.97）。CS - SES - TC中各项目的因子载荷均高于0.6，具有收敛效度。基于多组CFA测试，非约束模型与约束模型之间的变化（ΔCFI）≤0.01，表明性别测量不变性成立。参与者的CS - SES - TC得分与他们的FACT - G得分呈正相关，与他们的CES - D得分呈负相关。这些量表表现出同时效度和区分效度。CS - SES - TC的Cronbach's α在0.97至0.98之间。
CS - SES - TC具有可接受的信效度。医护人员可使用该量表持续评估癌症幸存者与癌症相关的自我效能感。
