Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
HGG Adv. 2024 Oct 10;5(4):100344. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100344. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
A novel algorithm, AlphaMissense, has been shown to have an improved ability to predict the pathogenicity of rare missense genetic variants. However, it is not known whether AlphaMissense improves the ability of gene-based testing to identify disease-influencing genes. Using whole-exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank, we compared gene-based association analysis strategies including sets of deleterious variants: predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) variants only, pLoF plus AlphaMissense pathogenic variants, pLoF with missense variants predicted to be deleterious by any of five commonly utilized annotation methods (Missense (1/5)) or only variants predicted to be deleterious by all five methods (Missense (5/5)). We measured performance to identify 519 previously identified positive control genes, which can lead to Mendelian diseases, or are the targets of successfully developed medicines. These strategies identified 0.85 million pLoF variants and 5 million deleterious missense variants, including 22,131 likely pathogenic missense variants identified exclusively by AlphaMissense. The gene-based association tests found 608 significant gene associations (at p < 1.25 × 10) across 24 common traits and diseases. Compared with pLoFs plus Missense (5/5), tests using pLoFs and AlphaMissense variants found slightly more significant gene-disease and gene-trait associations, albeit with a marginally lower proportion of positive control genes. Nevertheless, their overall performance was similar. Merging AlphaMissense with Missense (5/5), whether through their intersection or union, did not yield any further enhancement in performance. In summary, employing AlphaMissense to select deleterious variants for gene-based testing did not improve the ability to identify genes that are known to influence disease.
一种新的算法,AlphaMissense,已被证明能够提高预测罕见错义遗传变异致病性的能力。然而,尚不清楚 AlphaMissense 是否能提高基于基因的测试识别疾病相关基因的能力。我们使用英国生物库的外显子组测序数据,比较了包括一组有害变异在内的基于基因的关联分析策略:仅预测失活功能(pLoF)变异、pLoF 加上 AlphaMissense 致病性变异、pLoF 加上通过五种常用注释方法(错义(1/5))预测为有害的错义变异或仅通过所有五种方法预测为有害的变异(错义(5/5))。我们测量了识别 519 个先前确定的阳性对照基因的性能,这些基因可能导致孟德尔疾病,或者是已成功开发药物的靶点。这些策略鉴定了 85 万个 pLoF 变异和 500 万个有害错义变异,包括仅由 AlphaMissense 鉴定的 22,131 个可能致病性错义变异。基于基因的关联测试在 24 种常见特征和疾病中发现了 608 个显著的基因关联(在 p < 1.25 × 10 )。与 pLoFs 加错义(5/5)相比,使用 pLoFs 和 AlphaMissense 变异的测试发现了更多的显著基因疾病和基因特征关联,尽管阳性对照基因的比例略低。尽管如此,它们的整体性能相似。将 AlphaMissense 与错义(5/5)合并,无论是通过它们的交集还是并集,都没有进一步提高性能。总之,将 AlphaMissense 用于选择有害变异进行基于基因的测试并没有提高识别已知影响疾病的基因的能力。