Foroughi Amirsoheil, Naderi Kamyar, Ghaemi Ahad, Yazdi Mohammad Sadegh Kalami, Mosavi Mohammad Reza
School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, 16846, Iran.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):19711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70339-0.
The study examined mass transfer coefficients in a structured CO absorption column using machine learning (ML) and response surface methodology (RSM). Three correlations for the fractional effective area (a), gas phase mass transfer coefficient (k), and liquid phase mass transfer coefficient (k) were derived with coefficient of determination (R) values of 0.9717, 0.9907 and 0.9323, respectively. To develop these correlations, four characteristics of structured packings, including packing surface area (a), packing corrugation angle (θ), packing channel base (B), and packing crimp height (h), were used. ML used five models, represented as random forest (RF), radial basis function neural network (RBF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), XGB Regressor, and Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), with the best models being radial basis function neural network (RBF) for a (R = 0.9813, MSE = 0.00088), RBF for k (R = 0.9933, MSE = 0.00056), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for k (R = 0.9871, MSE = 0.00089). The channel base had the most impact on a and k, while crimp height affected k the most. Although the RSM method produced adequate equations for each output variable with good predictability, the ML method provides superior modeling capabilities.
该研究使用机器学习(ML)和响应面方法(RSM)研究了结构化CO吸收塔中的传质系数。分别推导了有效面积分数(a)、气相传质系数(k)和液相传质系数(k)的三个关联式,其决定系数(R)值分别为0.9717、0.9907和0.9323。为了建立这些关联式,使用了结构化填料的四个特征,包括填料表面积(a)、填料波纹角(θ)、填料通道底部(B)和填料卷曲高度(h)。ML使用了五个模型,分别表示为随机森林(RF)、径向基函数神经网络(RBF)、多层感知器(MLP)、XGB回归器和极端随机树回归器(ETR),其中最佳模型为a的径向基函数神经网络(RBF)(R = 0.9813,MSE = 0.00088)、k的RBF(R = 0.9933,MSE = 0.00056)和k的多层感知器(MLP)(R = 0.9871,MSE = 0.00089)。通道底部对a和k的影响最大,而卷曲高度对k的影响最大。虽然RSM方法为每个输出变量生成了具有良好预测性的适当方程,但ML方法提供了更优越的建模能力。