• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用 DEA 方法对初级医疗保健进行建模效率评估:在一个医疗保健区的实证分析。

Modelling efficiency in primary healthcare using the DEA methodology: an empirical analysis in a healthcare district.

机构信息

Research Unit for Health Economics and Management, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, 46022, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11420-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11420-2
PMID:39182078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary healthcare management efficiency conditions the functioning of specialized care and has a direct impact on the outcomes of the health system and its sustainability. The objective of this research is to develop models to evaluate the efficiency, including health outcomes, of the primary healthcare centres (PHC) of the Clínico - La Malvarrosa Health District in Valencia.

METHODS

To evaluate efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used with output orientation and variable returns to scale, with panel data from the years 2015 to 2019. In rates per 10,000 inhabitants, the inputs are: medical and nursing staff and pharmacy cost. The outputs are: number of consultations, hospital emergencies, referrals, avoidable hospitalisations, avoidable mortality and pharmaceutical prescription efficiency. As exogenous variables: the percentage of population over 65 years old, over 80 and case-mix. Three models were developed, all of them with the same inputs and different combinations of outputs related to: healthcare activity, outcomes, and both, in order to study the influence of the different approaches on efficiency. Each model is analysed both without exogenous variables and with each of them.

RESULTS

The efficiency results vary depending on the model used, although certain PHCs are always on, or very close to, the efficient frontier, while others are always inefficient. When healthcare activity outputs are considered, efficiency scores improve and the number of efficient PHCs increases. However, in general, the PHC score decreases throughout the evaluated period. This decrease is more pronounced when only activity outputs are included.

CONCLUSIONS

DEA allows the inefficiencies of PHCs to be analysed and the efficient ones are clearly distinguished from the inefficient, although different efficiency scores are obtained depending on the model used. Evaluation can be according to healthcare activity, health outcomes or both, making it necessary to identify the expected objectives of the PHCs, as the perspective of the analysis influences the results.

摘要

背景

基层医疗保健管理效率决定了专科医疗的运作,并直接影响卫生系统的结果及其可持续性。本研究的目的是开发模型来评估基层医疗保健中心(PHC)的效率,包括健康结果,该模型基于瓦伦西亚 Clínico-La Malvarrosa 卫生区的 2015 年至 2019 年的面板数据。

方法

使用具有输出导向和可变规模报酬的数据包络分析(DEA)来评估效率。每 10000 居民的投入包括:医疗和护理人员以及药房成本。产出包括:就诊次数、医院急诊、转诊、可避免住院、可避免死亡和药物处方效率。作为外生变量:65 岁以上、80 岁以上和病例组合的人口百分比。开发了三个模型,所有模型都具有相同的投入和不同组合的产出,涉及:医疗保健活动、结果以及两者,以研究不同方法对效率的影响。每个模型都在没有外生变量和使用其中每个变量的情况下进行分析。

结果

效率结果因使用的模型而异,尽管某些 PHC 始终处于或非常接近有效前沿,而其他 PHC 则始终效率低下。当考虑医疗保健活动产出时,效率得分提高,有效的 PHC 数量增加。然而,一般来说,整个评估期间 PHC 的得分都在下降。当仅包括活动产出时,下降更为明显。

结论

DEA 允许分析 PHC 的效率低下,并清楚地区分有效的和无效的 PHC,尽管根据使用的模型获得不同的效率得分。评估可以根据医疗保健活动、健康结果或两者进行,这需要确定 PHC 的预期目标,因为分析的角度会影响结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db66/11344926/4ee34b0d5eb6/12913_2024_11420_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db66/11344926/b6b74077cdf3/12913_2024_11420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db66/11344926/4ee34b0d5eb6/12913_2024_11420_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db66/11344926/b6b74077cdf3/12913_2024_11420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db66/11344926/4ee34b0d5eb6/12913_2024_11420_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling efficiency in primary healthcare using the DEA methodology: an empirical analysis in a healthcare district.应用 DEA 方法对初级医疗保健进行建模效率评估:在一个医疗保健区的实证分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11420-2.
2
Efficiency Determinants in Healthcare: A Systematic Review With an Integrated Canonical Correlation Analysis-Data Envelopment Analysis/Assurance Region Model.医疗保健中的效率决定因素:一项结合典型相关分析-数据包络分析/保证区域模型的系统评价
J Healthc Manag. 2023;68(5):356-375. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00086.
3
Hospitals' efficiency in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗医院的效率:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:126. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_393_18. eCollection 2019.
4
Technical efficiency of provincial public healthcare in South Africa.南非省级公共医疗保健的技术效率
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Jan 28;18:3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-0199-y. eCollection 2020.
5
Technical efficiency of public district hospitals in Madhya Pradesh, India: a data envelopment analysis.印度中央邦公立区医院的技术效率:数据包络分析。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Sep 24;6:21742. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.21742.
6
Technical and scale efficiency of public community hospitals in Eritrea: an exploratory study.厄立特里亚公立社区医院的技术和规模效率:一项探索性研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2013 Mar 16;3(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-6.
7
Measuring the efficiency of the Greek rural primary health care using a restricted DEA model; the case of southern and western Greece.使用受限数据包络分析模型衡量希腊农村初级卫生保健的效率;以希腊南部和西部为例。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Dec;19(4):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9324-4. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
8
Measuring hospital efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis: nonsubstitutable vs. substitutable inputs and outputs.运用数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis)衡量医院效率:不可替代投入与产出和可替代投入与产出。
J Med Syst. 2011 Dec;35(6):1393-401. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9416-0. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
9
[Technical efficiency assessment of public primary care providers in the Basque Country (Spain), 2010-2013].[2010 - 2013年西班牙巴斯克地区公立基层医疗服务提供者的技术效率评估]
Gac Sanit. 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Importance of Statistical Evidence in Estimating Valid DEA Scores.统计证据在估计有效DEA分数中的重要性。
J Med Syst. 2016 Mar;40(3):47. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0408-y. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical efficiency of primary health care facilities in providing adolescent mental, sexual and reproductive health services in Ghana: A case study of selected districts in the Greater Accra Region.加纳初级卫生保健机构提供青少年心理、性与生殖健康服务的技术效率:大阿克拉地区部分选区的案例研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0321265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321265. eCollection 2025.
2
Study on the efficiency of health resource allocation in the western region of China-based on three-stage DEA and Tobit regression analysis.基于三阶段DEA和Tobit回归分析的中国西部地区卫生资源配置效率研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12630-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the efficiency of primary health care institutions in China: an improved three-stage data envelopment analysis approach.评价中国基层医疗机构的效率:一种改进的三阶段数据包络分析方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09979-3.
2
The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.医疗保健效率的核心:关于医院前沿分析的综合文献计量学综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;10(7):1316. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071316.
3
Factors affecting the technical efficiency of rural primary health care centers in Hamadan, Iran: data envelopment analysis and Tobit regression.
Evaluating the costs, work patterns and efficiency (CORE) of comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) in India (The CPHC CORE study): a top-down micro-costing study protocol.
评估印度综合初级卫生保健(CPHC)的成本、工作模式及效率(CORE)(CPHC CORE研究):一项自上而下的微观成本核算研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e093430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093430.
4
Evaluating hospital performance with additive DEA and MPI: the Isfahan University of Medical Science case study.运用加法数据包络分析和 Malmquist 生产力指数评估医院绩效:以伊斯法罕医科大学为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12145-y.
影响伊朗哈马丹农村初级卫生保健中心技术效率的因素:数据包络分析和Tobit回归
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Nov 23;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00249-1.
4
How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey.全科医生在 COVID-19 疫情初期如何调整其实践和组织:一项法国全国观察性调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):e042119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042119.
5
Reorganisation of primary care for older adults during COVID-19: a cross-sectional database study in the UK.COVID-19 期间老年人初级保健的重组:英国的一项横断面数据库研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):e540-e547. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710933. Print 2020 Aug.
6
COVID-19: Notes From the Front Line, Singapore's Primary Health Care Perspective.COVID-19:新加坡基层医疗视角的前线观察。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):259-261. doi: 10.1370/afm.2539.
7
What is the role of Primary Health Care in the COVID-19 pandemic?初级卫生保健在新冠疫情中扮演着什么角色?
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;29(2):e2020166. doi: 10.5123/s1679-49742020000200024. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Data envelopment analysis applications in primary health care: a systematic review.数据包络分析在初级卫生保健中的应用:系统评价。
Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 25;37(2):147-153. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz057.
9
[A deprivation index to reform the financing model of primary care in Catalonia (Spain)].[一项用于改革加泰罗尼亚地区(西班牙)初级医疗保健融资模式的匮乏指数]
Gac Sanit. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
The use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals.运用数据包络分析(DEA)于医疗保健领域,特别是医院方面。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Jun;22(2):245-286. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8. Epub 2018 Feb 24.