• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Tale of Three Spectra: Basic Symptoms in Clinical-High-Risk of Psychosis Vary Across Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder.三个谱系的故事:自闭症谱系障碍、分裂型人格障碍和边缘型人格障碍中,临床高危精神病的基本症状各不相同。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Jul 27;5(1):sgae017. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae017. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Cognitive disturbances basic symptoms in help-seeking patients with borderline personality disorder: Characteristics and association with schizotypy.边缘型人格障碍求助患者的认知障碍基本症状:特征及其与分裂型人格特质的关联
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13557. doi: 10.1111/eip.13557. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Exploring Identity Disturbance and Psychotic Spectrum Symptoms as Predictors of Borderline and Schizotypal Personality Disorders.探讨身份障碍和精神病性症状作为边缘型和分裂型人格障碍的预测因子。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(4):193-202. doi: 10.1159/000516209. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Anomalous self-experiences are strongly associated with negative symptoms in a clinical high-risk for psychosis sample.异常的自我体验与精神病高危临床样本中的阴性症状密切相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;93:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
5
Basic self-disturbance trajectories in clinical high risk for psychosis: a one-year follow-up study.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰轨迹:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;272(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01349-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Co-occurrence of borderline and schizotypal personality disorders: a scoping review.边缘型与分裂型人格障碍共病:范围综述。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;78(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2023.2254299. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Screening schizotypal personality disorder for detection of clinical high risk of psychosis in Chinese mental health services.中文精神卫生服务中筛查精神分裂型人格障碍以发现精神病临床高危风险。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;228(3):664-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.049. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
8
Adolescents and adults at clinical high-risk for psychosis: age-related differences in attenuated positive symptoms syndrome prevalence and entanglement with basic symptoms.临床高危精神病性状态的青少年和成年人:衰减阳性症状综合征患病率的年龄差异及其与基本症状的关联
Psychol Med. 2016 Apr;46(5):1069-78. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002627. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Harmonizing early intervention strategies: scoping review of clinical high risk for psychosis and borderline personality disorder.协调早期干预策略:对精神病和边缘性人格障碍临床高危状态的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1381864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1381864. eCollection 2024.
10
The role of mentalizing in the relationship between schizotypal personality traits and state signs of psychosis risk captured by cognitive and perceptive basic symptoms.心理化在分裂型人格特质与由认知和感知基本症状所捕捉到的精神病风险状态体征之间关系中的作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 21;14:1267656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1267656. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Anomalous self-experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Phenomenological and psychopathological correlates.精神分裂症谱系障碍中的异常自我体验:现象学与精神病理学关联
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 30;42:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100389. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards a Neurophenomenological Understanding of Self-Disorder in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Anatomical, Physiological, and Neurocognitive Findings.迈向对精神分裂症谱系障碍中自我障碍的神经现象学理解:解剖学、生理学和神经认知研究结果的系统综述与综合分析
Brain Sci. 2023 May 23;13(6):845. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060845.
2
Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment.精神分裂症高危个体共病精神障碍的荟萃分析患病率:跨诊断评估的情况。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;28(6):2291-2300. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
Protocol for the development and testing of the schiZotypy Autism Questionnaire (ZAQ) in adults: a new screening tool to discriminate autism spectrum disorder from schizotypal disorder.成人精神分裂症特质自闭症问卷(ZAQ)的编制与测试方案:一种新的筛查工具,用于区分自闭症谱系障碍和精神分裂症特质障碍。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04690-3.
4
A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a novel compassion and metacognition approach for schizotypal personality disorder with a combination of cognitive therapy and psychopharmacological treatment.一项比较新型的共情和元认知方法与认知疗法和精神药理学治疗相结合治疗精神分裂型人格障碍的初步随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04610-5.
5
Taking subjectivity seriously: towards a unification of phenomenology, psychiatry, and neuroscience.认真对待主观性:走向现象学、精神病学和神经科学的统一。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):10-16. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01891-2. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
6
Are Self-disorders in Schizophrenia Expressive of a Unifying Disturbance of Subjectivity: A Factor Analytic Approach.精神分裂症中的自我障碍是否表达了一种统一的主体性障碍:一种因素分析方法。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jan 3;49(1):144-150. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac123.
7
Differential diagnosis: Schizophrenia and personality disorder.鉴别诊断:精神分裂症和人格障碍。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Oct;248:171-172. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
8
Population-Based Psychiatric Comorbidity in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年基于人群的精神疾病共病:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 23;13:856208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.856208. eCollection 2022.
9
Autistic symptomatology in UHR patients: A preliminary report.超高危人群中自闭症谱系障碍的症状表现:一项初步报告。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114634. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114634. Epub 2022 May 14.
10
Autism spectrum disorder and personality disorders: Comorbidity and differential diagnosis.自闭症谱系障碍与人格障碍:共病与鉴别诊断。
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 19;11(12):1366-1386. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1366.

三个谱系的故事:自闭症谱系障碍、分裂型人格障碍和边缘型人格障碍中,临床高危精神病的基本症状各不相同。

A Tale of Three Spectra: Basic Symptoms in Clinical-High-Risk of Psychosis Vary Across Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder.

作者信息

Martin James C, Clark Scott R, Hartmann Simon, Schubert K Oliver

机构信息

Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Discipline of Psychiatry, Basil Hetzel Institute, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Jul 27;5(1):sgae017. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae017. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae017
PMID:39183768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

The clinical-high-risk (CHR) approach was developed to prevent psychosis through the detection of psychosis risk. CHR services are transdiagnostic in nature, therefore the appropriate management of comorbidity is a central part of care. Differential diagnosis is particularly challenging across 3 common comorbidities, schizotypal personality disorder (SPD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Phenomenological research indicates a disturbance of "basic self" may differentiate between these commonly comorbid disorders and can be captured by Huber's basic symptoms (BS) concept. We investigated whether BS vary across these disorders and may inform differential diagnosis in young person's meeting CHR criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 685 participants meeting CHR criteria from the NAPLS-3 cohort completed the COGDIS items of the schizophrenia proneness instrument, a measure of BS, as well as the structured interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). A logistic regression model was used to investigate the variation of COGDIS across SPD, ASD, and BPD, while controlling for age and SIPs positive severity.

STUDY RESULTS

Meeting COGDIS criteria was positively associated with SPD (OR = 1.72, CI = [1.31-2.28],  = .001) but not ASD nor BPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that "basic self-disturbance" as indicated by COGDIS differs across SPD, ASD, and BPD. COGDIS may be useful to inform the management of comorbidities in CHR services, by providing insight into subtle subjective experiences that may benefit from disorder-specific interventions.

摘要

背景与假设

临床高危(CHR)方法旨在通过检测精神病风险来预防精神病。CHR服务本质上是跨诊断的,因此合并症的适当管理是护理的核心部分。在三种常见的合并症,即分裂型人格障碍(SPD)、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)中进行鉴别诊断尤其具有挑战性。现象学研究表明,“基本自我”的紊乱可能区分这些常见的合并症,并且可以通过胡贝尔的基本症状(BS)概念来捕捉。我们调查了BS在这些疾病中的差异,以及是否可为符合CHR标准的年轻人的鉴别诊断提供信息。

研究设计

来自NAPLS-3队列的685名符合CHR标准的参与者完成了精神分裂症易感性量表的COGDIS项目(一种BS测量方法)以及DSM-5结构化访谈(SCID-5)。在控制年龄和SIPs阳性严重程度的同时,使用逻辑回归模型研究COGDIS在SPD、ASD和BPD中的差异。

研究结果

符合COGDIS标准与SPD呈正相关(优势比=1.72,可信区间=[1.31-2.28],P=.001),但与ASD和BPD无关。

结论

我们的结果表明,COGDIS所表明的“基本自我紊乱”在SPD、ASD和BPD中存在差异。COGDIS可能有助于为CHR服务中的合并症管理提供信息,通过洞察可能受益于特定疾病干预的细微主观体验。