• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索英国农业机器人技术发展中的包容性:何人、如何以及为何?

Exploring inclusion in UK agricultural robotics development: who, how, and why?

作者信息

Ayris Kirsten, Jackman Anna, Mauchline Alice, Rose David Christian

机构信息

School of Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR UK.

Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR UK.

出版信息

Agric Human Values. 2024;41(3):1257-1275. doi: 10.1007/s10460-024-10555-6. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10460-024-10555-6
PMID:39183776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341617/
Abstract

The global agricultural sector faces a significant number of challenges for a sustainable future, and one of the tools proposed to address these challenges is the use of automation in agriculture. In particular, robotic systems for agricultural tasks are being designed, tested, and increasingly commercialised in many countries. Much touted as an environmentally beneficial technology with the ability to improve data management and reduce the use of chemical inputs while improving yields and addressing labour shortages, agricultural robotics also presents a number of potential ethical challenges - including rural unemployment, the amplification of economic and digital inequalities, and entrenching unsustainable farming practices. As such, development is not uncontroversial, and there have been calls for a responsible approach to their innovation that integrates more substantive inclusion into development processes. This study investigates current approaches to participation and inclusion amongst United Kingdom (UK) agricultural robotics developers. Through semi-structured interviews with key members of the UK agricultural robotics sector, we analyse the stakeholder engagement currently integrated into development processes. We explore who is included, how inclusion is done, and what the inclusion is done for. We reflect on how these findings align with the current literature on stakeholder inclusion in agricultural technology development, and suggest what they could mean for the development of more substantive responsible innovation in agricultural robotics.

摘要

全球农业部门在迈向可持续未来的道路上面临着诸多重大挑战,而应对这些挑战所提出的工具之一便是在农业中运用自动化技术。特别是,用于农业任务的机器人系统正在许多国家进行设计、测试,并日益实现商业化。农业机器人技术常被吹捧为一种对环境有益的技术,它能够改善数据管理、减少化学投入物的使用,同时提高产量并解决劳动力短缺问题,但它也带来了一些潜在的伦理挑战,包括农村失业、经济和数字不平等的加剧,以及使不可持续的耕作方式根深蒂固。因此,其发展并非毫无争议,已经有人呼吁采取一种负责任的创新方式,将更实质性的包容性纳入发展进程。本研究调查了英国农业机器人开发者目前的参与和包容方式。通过对英国农业机器人领域关键成员进行半结构化访谈,我们分析了目前融入发展进程的利益相关者参与情况。我们探究哪些人被纳入、如何实现包容以及包容的目的何在。我们思考这些研究结果如何与农业技术发展中利益相关者包容的现有文献相契合,并探讨它们对于农业机器人更实质性的负责任创新发展可能意味着什么。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/4da458cb8785/10460_2024_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/b1a7106326ce/10460_2024_10555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/2dc308949c81/10460_2024_10555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/4da458cb8785/10460_2024_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/b1a7106326ce/10460_2024_10555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/2dc308949c81/10460_2024_10555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/11341617/4da458cb8785/10460_2024_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring inclusion in UK agricultural robotics development: who, how, and why?探索英国农业机器人技术发展中的包容性:何人、如何以及为何?
Agric Human Values. 2024;41(3):1257-1275. doi: 10.1007/s10460-024-10555-6. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Responsible robotics design-A systems approach to developing design guides for robotics in pasture-grazed dairy farming.负责任的机器人设计——一种为牧场放牧式奶牛养殖中的机器人开发设计指南的系统方法。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jul 15;9:914850. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.914850. eCollection 2022.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Agrochemical-free genetically modified and genome-edited crops: Towards achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals and a 'greener' green revolution.无农药基因改良和基因编辑作物:实现联合国可持续发展目标和“更绿色”的绿色革命。
J Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 20;389:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
5
Soft robotics for farm to fork: applications in agriculture & farming.用于从农场到餐桌的软机器人:农业和养殖中的应用。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2024 Feb 27;19(2). doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/ad2084.
6
Mobile robotics in smart farming: current trends and applications.智能农业中的移动机器人:当前趋势与应用
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Aug 31;6:1213330. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1213330. eCollection 2023.
7
'Is there value for us in agriculture?' A case study of youth participation in agricultural value chains in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.“农业对我们有价值吗?” 南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省青年参与农业价值链的案例研究。
Cogent Food Agric. 2023 Nov 16;9(2):2280365. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2280365.
8
Occupational Safety and Health with Technological Developments in Livestock Farms: A Literature Review.养殖场技术发展带来的职业安全与健康:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416440.
9
Rural Financial Development Impacts on Agricultural Technology Innovation: Evidence from China.农村金融发展对农业技术创新的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031110.
10
Emerging technology in agriculture: Opportunities and considerations for occupational safety and health researchers.农业领域的新兴技术:职业安全与健康研究人员的机遇与考量
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:92-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Social science - STEM collaborations in agriculture, food and beyond: an STSFAN manifesto.社会科学与农业、食品及其他领域的STEM合作:一份STSFAN宣言。
Agric Human Values. 2023 May 1:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10438-2.
2
Responsible development of autonomous robotics in agriculture.农业中自主机器人的负责任开发。
Nat Food. 2021 May;2(5):306-309. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00287-9.
3
Responsible robotics design-A systems approach to developing design guides for robotics in pasture-grazed dairy farming.负责任的机器人设计——一种为牧场放牧式奶牛养殖中的机器人开发设计指南的系统方法。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jul 15;9:914850. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.914850. eCollection 2022.
4
Automating Agroecology: How to Design a Farming Robot Without a Monocultural Mindset?农业生态学自动化:如何在没有单一栽培思维模式的情况下设计农业机器人?
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2022;35(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09876-x. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
Farm robots: ecological utopia or dystopia?农业机器人:生态乌托邦还是反乌托邦?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep;36(9):774-777. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Perceptions of Barriers to Patient Participation: Are They Due to Language, Culture, or Discrimination?患者参与障碍的认知:是语言、文化还是歧视导致的?
Health Commun. 2019 Nov;34(12):1469-1481. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1500431. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
8
Listened to, but not heard! The failure to represent the public in genetically modified food policies.被倾听,却未被听见!转基因食品政策中公众意见的缺失。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Nov;27(8):923-936. doi: 10.1177/0963662518766286. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?是时候挑战系统评价高于叙述性综述这种虚假的等级制度了?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2018 Jun;48(6):e12931. doi: 10.1111/eci.12931. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction.迈向人机交互中机器人自主水平的框架。
J Hum Robot Interact. 2014 Jul;3(2):74-99. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer.