Ditzler Lenora, Driessen Clemens
Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cultural Geography Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2022;35(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09876-x. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
Robots are widely expected-and pushed-to transform open-field agriculture, but these visions remain wedded to optimizing monocultural farming systems. Meanwhile there is little pull for automation from ecology-based, diversified farming realms. Noting this gap, we here explore the potential for robots to foster an agroecological approach to crop production. The research was situated in The Netherlands within the case of , a nascent farming method in which multiple food and service crops are planted together in diverse assemblages employing agroecological practices such as intercropping and biological pest control. Around this case we engaged with a variety of specialists in discussion groups, workshops, and design challenges to explore the potential of field robots to meet the multifaceted demands of highly diverse agroecological cropping systems. This generated a spectrum of imaginations for how automated tools might-or might not-be appropriately used, ranging from fully automated visions, to collaborative scenarios, to fully analogue prototypes. We found that automating agroecological cropping systems requires finding ways to imbue the ethos of agroecology into designed tools, thereby seeking to overcome tensions between production aims and other forms of social and ecological care. We conclude that a rethinking of automation is necessary for agroecological contexts: not as a blueprint for replacing humans, but making room for analogue and hybrid forms of agricultural work. These findings highlight a need for design processes which include a diversity of actors, involve iterative design cycles, and incorporate feedback between designers, practitioners, tools, and cropping systems.
人们广泛期待并推动机器人改变露天农业,但这些设想仍局限于优化单一作物种植系统。与此同时,基于生态的多样化农业领域对自动化的需求却很少。注意到这一差距,我们在此探讨机器人促进作物生产的农业生态方法的潜力。这项研究位于荷兰,以一种新兴的耕作方法为例,在这种方法中,多种粮食和服务作物以不同组合种植在一起,并采用间作和生物害虫防治等农业生态实践。围绕这个案例,我们与各种专家进行了讨论小组、研讨会和设计挑战,以探索田间机器人满足高度多样化农业生态种植系统多方面需求的潜力。这引发了一系列关于自动化工具如何(或可能不)被适当使用的想象,从完全自动化的设想,到协作场景,再到完全模拟的原型。我们发现,使农业生态种植系统自动化需要找到将农业生态理念融入设计工具的方法,从而试图克服生产目标与其他形式的社会和生态关怀之间的紧张关系。我们得出结论,在农业生态背景下,有必要重新思考自动化:不是作为取代人类的蓝图,而是为农业工作的模拟和混合形式留出空间。这些发现凸显了设计过程的必要性,这些过程应包括不同的参与者,涉及迭代设计周期,并纳入设计师、从业者、工具和种植系统之间的反馈。