Onizuka Naoko, Sinvani Liron, Quatman Carmen
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
TRIA Orthopedics, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Saint Louis Park, MN, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024 Aug 23;15:21514593241277737. doi: 10.1177/21514593241277737. eCollection 2024.
Geriatric fracture is a pressing global health issue, marked by elevated mortality and morbidity rates and escalating health care costs. The evolving health care system from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement has led to externally driven reward and reimbursement systems that may not account for the complexity of caring for older adults with fracture.
The aim of this review is to highlight the need for a shift towards meaningful metrics that impact geriatric fracture care and to issue a call to action for all medical societies to advocate for national reimbursement and ranking systems that focus on metrics that truly matter.
Traditional metrics, while easier to capture, may not necessarily represent high quality care and may even have unintentional adverse consequences. For example, the focus on reducing length of stay may lead to older patients being discharged too early, without adequately addressing pain, constipation, or delirium. In addition, a focus on mortality may miss the opportunity to deliver compassionate end-of-life care. Existing geriatric fracture care metrics have expanded beyond traditional metrics to include assessment by geriatricians, fracture prevention, and delirium assessments. However, there is a need to further consider and develop patient-focused metrics. The Age-Friendly Health Initiative (4 Ms), which includes Mobility, Medication, Mentation, and what Matters is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults. Additional metrics that should be considered include an assessment of nutrition and secondary fracture prevention.
In the realm of geriatric fracture care, the metrics currently employed often revolve around adherence to established guidelines and are heavily influenced by financial considerations. It is crucial to shift the paradigm towards metrics that truly matter for geriatric fracture patients, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their care and the profound impact these fractures have on their lives.
老年骨折是一个紧迫的全球健康问题,其死亡率和发病率居高不下,医疗保健成本不断攀升。从按服务收费到基于质量的报销的不断演变的医疗保健系统导致了外部驱动的奖励和报销系统,这些系统可能无法考虑到照顾老年骨折患者的复杂性。
本综述的目的是强调需要转向对老年骨折护理有影响的有意义的指标,并呼吁所有医学协会采取行动,倡导建立以真正重要的指标为重点的国家报销和排名系统。
传统指标虽然更容易获取,但不一定代表高质量的护理,甚至可能产生无意的不良后果。例如,专注于缩短住院时间可能导致老年患者过早出院,而没有充分解决疼痛、便秘或谵妄问题。此外,关注死亡率可能会错过提供富有同情心的临终关怀的机会。目前的老年骨折护理指标已从传统指标扩展到包括老年科医生评估、骨折预防和谵妄评估。然而,需要进一步考虑和制定以患者为中心的指标。“关爱老年人健康倡议”(4M),包括活动能力、用药、认知能力和重要事项,是一个基于证据的框架,用于评估和处理老年人护理中的关键问题。应考虑的其他指标包括营养评估和二次骨折预防。
在老年骨折护理领域,目前采用的指标通常围绕遵循既定指南展开,并受到财务因素的严重影响。至关重要的是要将范式转向对老年骨折患者真正重要的指标,认识到他们护理的多面性以及这些骨折对他们生活的深远影响。