• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Policy brief Belgian EBCP Mirror Group patient and citizen engagement.政策简报 比利时循证临床实践镜鉴小组患者及公民参与情况
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;82(Suppl 1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01370-w.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Policy brief Belgian EBCP mirror group 'prevention' and 'early detection & screening' in cancer.政策简报:比利时癌症早筛与预防镜组“预防”及“早期发现与筛查”
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;82(Suppl 1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01368-4.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Policy brief of the Belgian Europe's Beating Cancer Plan mirror group: children, adolescents and young adults with cancer.比利时“欧洲战胜癌症计划”镜像小组政策简报:癌症患儿、青少年和青年成人
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;82(Suppl 1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01366-6.
7
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
8
A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.一项关于衡量和评估公民参与健康研究的方法的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 10;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00405-2.
9
New and emerging technology for adult social care - the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology.成人社会关怀新技术——以具有人工智能 (AI) 技术的家庭传感器为例。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(9):1-64. doi: 10.3310/HRYW4281.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence based policy making during times of uncertainty through the lens of future policy makers: four recommendations to harmonise and guide health policy making in the future.透过未来政策制定者的视角,审视不确定性时期基于证据的政策制定:关于协调和指导未来卫生政策制定的四项建议。
Arch Public Health. 2022 May 18;80(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00898-z.
2
Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions.社区参与叙事:公共卫生干预措施的系统评价衍生概念框架
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4.
3
The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis.社区参与对弱势群体公共卫生干预措施的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.
4
Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.哪些公众以及为何是刻意选择的?——对公共卫生与卫生政策研究中公众参与审议的范围界定审查
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

政策简报 比利时循证临床实践镜鉴小组患者及公民参与情况

Policy brief Belgian EBCP Mirror Group patient and citizen engagement.

作者信息

Van Hoof Wannes, Schittecatte Gabrielle

机构信息

Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;82(Suppl 1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01370-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-024-01370-w
PMID:39187893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345950/
Abstract

Rights, preferences, needs and expectations of patients and citizens can only be respected and addressed if they are well understood. As such, a continuous, systematic and formalised dialogue between patients, citizens and policy makers is required to ensure ethical and socially appropriate cancer prevention, diagnostics, treatment and care. Relying on donations and project-based funding is not a sustainable way to ensure patient involvement and representativeness in policy. Patient organizations need long term, structural support to fulfil their role as patient representatives and support network in order to deliver the best possible service and to play their role as a professional representative of their disease-specific community. Inequalities can only be tackled if they are properly identified. This requires the definition of appropriate determinants fit for (inter)national comparison and extension and linkage of good quality data registries for cancer that allow the monitoring these inequalities.

摘要

只有充分理解患者和公民的权利、偏好、需求及期望,才能予以尊重和满足。因此,患者、公民与政策制定者之间需要进行持续、系统且正式的对话,以确保癌症预防、诊断、治疗及护理符合伦理道德且适应社会需求。依靠捐赠和基于项目的资金并非确保患者参与政策制定并具有代表性的可持续方式。患者组织需要长期的结构性支持,以履行其作为患者代表和支持网络的职责,从而提供尽可能优质的服务,并在其特定疾病群体中发挥专业代表的作用。只有正确识别不平等现象,才能加以解决。这需要定义适合(跨)国家比较的适当决定因素,并扩展和链接高质量的癌症数据登记处,以便监测这些不平等现象。