• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗急性心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞的真实世界注册研究。

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in acute heart failure and left bundle-branch block in a real-life registry.

机构信息

Hospital d'Olot i Comarcal de la Garrotxa, Emergency Department, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory (TR2Lab), Institut de Recerca i Innovació en Ciències de la Vida i de la Salut a la Catalunya Central (IrisCC), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Colomb Med (Cali). 2023 Dec 29;54(4):e2015850. doi: 10.25100/cm.v54i4.5850. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.25100/cm.v54i4.5850
PMID:39188922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11346346/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence, characteristics, timing of implementation and prognosis of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and acute heart failure (AHF) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in a real-life registry.

METHODS

We analysed the characteristics of patients with AHF and LBBB at the time of inclusion in the EAHFE (Epidemiology Acute Heart Failure Emergency) cohort to determine the indication for CRT, the timing of implementation and its impact on 10-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

729 patients with a median age of 82 years and there was a high burden of comorbidities and functional dependence. The median left-ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40%. Forty-six (6%) patients were treated with CRT at some point during follow-up, with a median time of delay for CRT implementation of 960 (IQR=1,147 days) and at least 108 more untreated patients fulfilled criteria for CRT. Patients receiving CRT were younger, had different comorbidities, less functional dependence (higher Barthel index) and lower LVEF values. The median follow-up was 5.7 years (95% CI: 5.6-5.8) and CRT was not associated with changes in 10-year mortality (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.72-2.48; p-value 0.4). When compared with untreated patients fulfilling criteria for CRT, very similar results were observed (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.67-2.68).

CONCLUSIONS

CRT implementation was delayed and underused in patients with AHF and LBBB. Under these circumstances, CRT is not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in the long term.

摘要

目的

在真实世界的注册研究中,确定接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)和急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的患病率、特征、实施时间和预后。

方法

我们分析了 EAHFE(急性心力衰竭急诊流行病学)队列中纳入时伴有 AHF 和 LBBB 的患者的特征,以确定 CRT 的适应证、实施时间及其对 10 年全因死亡率的影响。

结果

729 例患者的中位年龄为 82 岁,合并症和功能依赖性负担较高。中位左心室射血分数(LVEF)为 40%。46 例(6%)患者在随访期间的某个时间点接受了 CRT 治疗,CRT 实施的中位延迟时间为 960 天(IQR=1147 天),至少还有 108 例未接受 CRT 治疗的患者符合 CRT 标准。接受 CRT 的患者年龄较小,合并症不同,功能依赖性较低(较高的巴氏指数),LVEF 值较低。中位随访时间为 5.7 年(95%CI:5.6-5.8),CRT 与 10 年死亡率变化无关(校正 HR 1.33,95%CI:0.72-2.48;p 值 0.4)。与符合 CRT 标准但未接受治疗的患者相比,观察到非常相似的结果(校正 HR 1.34,95%CI:0.67-2.68)。

结论

在 AHF 和 LBBB 患者中,CRT 的实施被延迟且未得到充分利用。在这种情况下,长期来看 CRT 并不能降低全因死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/c10a480a4e0d/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/8449c3b469b9/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/c10a480a4e0d/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/54e7b304b7cd/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/c10a480a4e0d/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/8449c3b469b9/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/c10a480a4e0d/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/54e7b304b7cd/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5134/11346346/c10a480a4e0d/1657-9534-cm-54-04-e2015850-gf4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in acute heart failure and left bundle-branch block in a real-life registry.心脏再同步治疗急性心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞的真实世界注册研究。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2023 Dec 29;54(4):e2015850. doi: 10.25100/cm.v54i4.5850. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Predictors of long-term mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.轻度心力衰竭合并左束支传导阻滞患者接受心脏再同步治疗后长期死亡率的预测因素
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1002/clc.23058.
3
Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.不同亚型真性左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗反应
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Gender, underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block in heart failure.性别、心脏再同步治疗的未充分利用以及心力衰竭中QRS波增宽和左束支传导阻滞的预后影响
Europace. 2015 Mar;17(3):424-31. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu205. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
6
True left bundle branch block and long-term mortality in cardiac resynchronisation therapy patients.真性左束支传导阻滞与心脏再同步化治疗患者的长期死亡率。
Kardiol Pol. 2019;77(3):371-379. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2019.0032. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Size Matters: Normalization of QRS Duration to Left Ventricular Dimension Improves Prediction of Long-Term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome.大小很重要:将 QRS 持续时间标准化为左心室维度可改善长期心脏再同步治疗结果的预测。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006767. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006767.
8
Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.真性左束支传导阻滞患者经左束支区域起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的显著疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1002/clc.23462. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.随机试验:左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心脏再同步治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
10
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.

本文引用的文献

1
The prognostic significance of bundle branch block in acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.束支传导阻滞对急性心力衰竭预后的意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Aug;112(8):1020-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02105-z. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
2
The effect of cardiac resynchronization without a defibrillator on morbidity and mortality: an individual patient data meta-analysis of COMPANION and CARE-HF.无除颤器心脏再同步化治疗对发病率和死亡率的影响:COMPANION 和 CARE-HF 的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):1080-1090. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2524. Epub 2022 May 22.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):71-164. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab232.
4
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
5
Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology.心脏再同步治疗的优化实施:呼吁采取行动以转诊和优化治疗:心力衰竭协会(HFA)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)和欧洲心脏病学会的心血管影像协会(EACVI)的联合立场声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;22(12):2349-2369. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2046.
6
Eligibility for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure.心力衰竭住院患者心脏再同步治疗的适应证。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;5(4):668-674. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12297. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Time trends in characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of 13,791 patients with acute heart failure.13791 例急性心力衰竭患者的特征、临床过程和结局的时间趋势。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Oct;107(10):897-913. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1261-z. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.欧洲心脏病学会成员国心脏电子设备使用情况及电生理手术统计:欧洲心律协会2014年报告
Europace. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:i1-75. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu300.
9
Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.队列研究中的不朽时间偏倚问题:以他汀类药物预防糖尿病进展为例
BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5087.
10
Survival analysis part II: multivariate data analysis--an introduction to concepts and methods.生存分析第二部分:多变量数据分析——概念与方法介绍
Br J Cancer. 2003 Aug 4;89(3):431-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601119.