Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2430306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30306.
Overuse of diagnostic testing is pervasive, but the extent to which it varies by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting is poorly understood.
To use a previously validated diagnostic intensity index to evaluate differences in diagnostic testing rates by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting, which may serve as a surrogate for diagnostic test overuse.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department (ED) discharges, hospital observation stays, and hospital admissions using administrative claims among EDs and acute care hospitals in Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, and New Jersey, from 2016 through 2018. The diagnostic intensity index pairs nonspecific principal discharge diagnoses (nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, and syncope) with related diagnostic tests to estimate rates of nondiagnostic testing. Adults with an acute care encounter with a principal discharge diagnosis of interest were included. Data were analyzed from January to February 2024.
Race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, other [including American Indian, multiracial, and multiethnic], and missing).
Receipt of a diagnostic test. Generalized linear models with a hospital-specific indicator variable were estimated to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of receiving a test related to the principal discharge diagnosis by race and ethnicity, controlling for primary payer and zip code income quartile.
Of 3 683 055 encounters (1 055 575 encounters [28.7%] for Black, 300 333 encounters [8.2%] for Hispanic, and 2 140 335 encounters [58.1%] for White patients; mean [SD] age of patients with encounters, 47.3 [18.8] years; 2 233 024 encounters among females [60.6%]), most (2 969 974 encounters [80.6%]) were ED discharges. Black compared with White patients discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of interest had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.75) of having related diagnostic testing. No other racial or ethnic disparities of a similar magnitude were observed in any acute care settings.
In this study, White patients discharged from the ED with a nonspecific diagnosis of interest were significantly more likely than Black patients to receive related diagnostic testing. The extent to which this represents diagnostic test overuse in White patients vs undertesting and missed diagnoses in Black patients deserves further study.
过度使用诊断检测在临床上普遍存在,但种族和民族差异在急性护理环境中的程度还不太了解。
使用以前验证过的诊断强度指数来评估急性护理环境中种族和民族之间的诊断检测率差异,这可能是诊断测试过度使用的替代指标。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在肯塔基州、马里兰州、北卡罗来纳州和新泽西州的急诊室(ED)和急性护理医院进行的 ED 出院、医院观察和住院的横断面研究,使用了行政索赔中的数据。诊断强度指数将非特异性主要出院诊断(恶心和呕吐、腹痛、胸痛和晕厥)与相关诊断测试配对,以估计非诊断性测试的比率。纳入了有急性护理就诊且主要出院诊断为感兴趣的成年人。数据于 2024 年 1 月至 2 月进行分析。
种族和民族(亚洲人、黑人、西班牙裔、白人、其他[包括美洲原住民、多种族和多种族]和缺失)。
接受诊断性检查。使用带有医院特定指示变量的广义线性模型来估计按种族和民族接受与主要出院诊断相关的检查的调整后比值比,同时控制主要支付人和邮政编码收入四分位数。
在 3683055 次就诊中(黑人就诊 1055575 次[28.7%],西班牙裔就诊 300333 次[8.2%],白人就诊 2140335 次[58.1%];就诊患者的平均[SD]年龄为 47.3[18.8]岁;女性就诊 2233024 次[60.6%]),大多数(2969974 次就诊[80.6%])为 ED 出院。与白人患者相比,从 ED 出院的黑人患者接受相关诊断检测的调整后比值比为 0.74(95%CI,0.72-0.75)。在任何急性护理环境中,都没有观察到其他同等程度的种族或民族差异。
在这项研究中,从 ED 出院的黑人患者与白人患者相比,患有非特异性感兴趣诊断的患者接受相关诊断检测的可能性显著降低。这在多大程度上代表了白人患者的诊断测试过度使用,而在黑人患者中则代表了测试不足和诊断遗漏,这值得进一步研究。