• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高层次解释思维模式促进基于主题关联关系对信息进行分类。

High-level construal mindset promotes categorizing information based on thematic associate relations.

作者信息

Shi Kai, Li Jiansheng

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730050, People's Republic of China.

Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):983-994. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01624-6. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01624-6
PMID:39192140
Abstract

The present study examined whether a high-level construal mindset promotes categorizing information according to thematic relations. In three experiments, the construal-level priming task was used to initiate a high-level versus low-level construal mindset, and then all participants were asked to complete the triad task, which is a task measuring the preference to classify. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 have shown that regardless of whether it was a set of artificially produced objects (Experiment 1) or a set of natural objects (Experiment 2), the high-level construal mindset group exhibited a higher proportion of thematic responses in the triad task. Experiment 3 transformed the stimulus set of the triad task into a set that consisted of many, larger, published, and controlled/optimized stimuli. The results of the experiment still showed that the high-level construal mindset group exhibited a higher proportion of thematic responses in the triad task. The findings suggest that a high-level construal mindset promotes categorizing information based on thematic relations.

摘要

本研究考察了高水平解释思维模式是否会促进根据主题关系对信息进行分类。在三个实验中,使用解释水平启动任务来引发高水平与低水平的解释思维模式,然后要求所有参与者完成三元组任务,这是一项测量分类偏好的任务。实验1和2的结果表明,无论是一组人工制造的物体(实验1)还是一组自然物体(实验2),高水平解释思维模式组在三元组任务中表现出更高比例的主题反应。实验3将三元组任务的刺激集转换为由许多更大、已发表且经过控制/优化的刺激组成的集合。实验结果仍然表明,高水平解释思维模式组在三元组任务中表现出更高比例的主题反应。研究结果表明,高水平解释思维模式会促进基于主题关系对信息进行分类。

相似文献

1
High-level construal mindset promotes categorizing information based on thematic associate relations.高层次解释思维模式促进基于主题关联关系对信息进行分类。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):983-994. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01624-6. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Construal level and cross-sensory influences: High-level construal increases the effect of color on drink perception.构建水平和跨感觉影响:高水平的构建会增加颜色对饮料感知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 May;148(5):890-904. doi: 10.1037/xge0000548. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
3
It's All in How You Think About It: Construal Level and the Iowa Gambling Task.一切都取决于你如何看待它:解释水平与爱荷华赌博任务。
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jan 22;10:2. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00002. eCollection 2016.
4
In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won't: distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments.一年内,学习将有助于记忆;明天则不然:距离和构想水平对元记忆判断的基础的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1621-7. doi: 10.1037/a0032381. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
5
Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?概念关系偏好:是策略问题还是显著性问题之一?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103018. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Response category width as a psychophysical manifestation of construal level and distance.反应类别宽度作为解释水平和距离的一种心理物理学表现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr;40(4):501-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167213517009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Think abstractly, smoke less: a brief construal-level intervention can promote self-control, leading to reduced cigarette consumption among current smokers.抽象思维,少吸烟:一个简短的构想水平干预可以促进自我控制,从而减少当前吸烟者的香烟消费。
Addiction. 2013 May;108(5):985-92. doi: 10.1111/add.12100. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
8
Concrete mindset impairs filtering in visual working memory.具体思维模式会损害视觉工作记忆中的过滤。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1917-1924. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01625-6.
9
Global precedence effects account for individual differences in taxonomic and thematic relations recognition performance.全局优先效应解释了分类学和主题关系识别表现中的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02655-z.
10
Beliefs about abstraction: Low-level and high-level construal signal different lay theories.关于抽象的信念:低水平和高水平的构建暗示了不同的浅层理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 May;152(5):1351-1367. doi: 10.1037/xge0001332. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Forests or trees? The effect of generating solutions to distant analogies on global-local processing.森林还是树木?解决远距离类比对整体-局部处理的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):709-718. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01897-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
2
Generating solutions to far analogies makes individuals tend to categorize information based on thematic relations.生成远类比的解决方案使得个体倾向于根据主题关系对信息进行分类。
Cogn Process. 2023 Nov;24(4):471-480. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01148-y. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Abstract thinking facilitates aggregation of information.
抽象思维有助于信息的聚合。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1733-1743. doi: 10.1037/xge0001126. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
The language of intuition: a thematic integration model of intuitive coherence judgments.直觉的语言:直觉连贯判断的主题整合模型。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1183-1198. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1736005. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Similarity is as similarity does? A critical inquiry into the effect of thematic association on similarity.相似性即相似性所为?主题关联对相似性影响的批判性探究。
Cognition. 2019 May;186:115-138. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Construal level and cross-sensory influences: High-level construal increases the effect of color on drink perception.构建水平和跨感觉影响:高水平的构建会增加颜色对饮料感知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 May;148(5):890-904. doi: 10.1037/xge0000548. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.分类和主题语义系统。
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Free classification of large sets of everyday objects is more thematic than taxonomic.对大量日常物品进行自由分类时,更多的是基于主题而非分类学。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jan;172:26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.主题知识、人工制品概念与左后颞叶:动作与物体语义的交汇之处。
Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Thematic relatedness production norms for 100 object concepts.100个物体概念的主题相关性生成规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1349-1357. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0679-8.