• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的模型评估严重多发伤患者发生全身炎症反应综合征概率的开发和验证。

Development and validation of a machine learning-based model to assess probability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with severe multiple traumas.

机构信息

University Hospital of Non-Commercial Joint-Stock Company "Semey Medical University", 1a, Ivan Sechenov str, Semey city, 071400, Republic of Kazakhstan.

Center of habilitation and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities of the Abai region, 109, Karagaily, Semey city, 071400, Republic of Kazakhstan.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02640-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02640-x
PMID:39192291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11351256/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a predictor of serious infectious complications, organ failure, and death in patients with severe polytrauma and is one of the reasons for delaying early total surgical treatment. To determine the risk of SIRS within 24 h after hospitalization, we developed six machine learning models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using retrospective data about the patient, the nature of the injury, the results of general and standard biochemical blood tests, and coagulation tests, six models were developed: decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, support vector and gradient boosting classifiers, logistic regressor, and neural network. The effectiveness of the models was assessed through internal and external validation.

RESULTS

Among the 439 selected patients with severe polytrauma in 230 (52.4%), SIRS was diagnosed within the first 24 h of hospitalization. The SIRS group was more strongly associated with class II bleeding (39.5% vs. 60.5%; OR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.23-2.65]; P = 0.0023), long-term vasopressor use (68.4% vs. 31.6%; OR 5.51 [95% CI: 2.37-5.23]; P < 0.0001), risk of acute coagulopathy (67.8% vs. 32.2%; OR 2.4 [95% CI: 1.55-3.77]; P < 0.0001), and greater risk of pneumonia (59.5% vs. 40.5%; OR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.19-2.54]; P = 0.0042), longer ICU length of stay (5 ± 6.3 vs. 2.7 ± 4.3 days; P < 0.0001) and mortality rate (64.5% vs. 35.5%; OR 10.87 [95% CI: 6.3-19.89]; P = 0.0391). Of all the models, the random forest classifier showed the best predictive ability in the internal (AUROC 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.96) and external validation (AUROC 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.91) datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed model made it possible to accurately predict the risk of developing SIRS in the early period after injury, allowing clinical specialists to predict patient management tactics and calculate medication and staffing needs for the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database of the National Library of Medicine (NCT06323096).

摘要

背景

全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)是严重多发伤患者发生严重感染并发症、器官衰竭和死亡的预测因素,也是延迟早期全面手术治疗的原因之一。为了确定住院后 24 小时内发生 SIRS 的风险,我们开发了六个机器学习模型。

材料和方法

使用患者的回顾性数据、损伤性质、一般和标准生化血液检查以及凝血检查结果,开发了六个模型:决策树、随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量和梯度提升分类器、逻辑回归器和神经网络。通过内部和外部验证评估模型的有效性。

结果

在 230 名(52.4%)严重多发伤患者中,有 439 名患者在住院后 24 小时内被诊断为 SIRS。SIRS 组与 II 级出血(39.5% vs. 60.5%;OR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.23-2.65];P=0.0023)、长期使用血管加压药(68.4% vs. 31.6%;OR 5.51 [95% CI: 2.37-5.23];P<0.0001)、急性凝血病风险(67.8% vs. 32.2%;OR 2.4 [95% CI: 1.55-3.77];P<0.0001)和肺炎风险(59.5% vs. 40.5%;OR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.19-2.54];P=0.0042)之间的关联更强,入住 ICU 的时间更长(5±6.3 天 vs. 2.7±4.3 天;P<0.0001),死亡率更高(64.5% vs. 35.5%;OR 10.87 [95% CI: 6.3-19.89];P=0.0391)。在所有模型中,随机森林分类器在内部(AUROC 0.89;95% CI: 0.83-0.96)和外部验证(AUROC 0.83;95% CI: 0.75-0.91)数据集上均显示出最佳的预测能力。

结论

该模型可以准确预测损伤后早期发生 SIRS 的风险,使临床专家能够预测患者的管理策略,并计算患者的用药和人员配备需求。

证据水平

3 级。

试验注册

该研究在国家医学图书馆的 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库中进行了回顾性注册(NCT06323096)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/59ae33fceec8/12911_2024_2640_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/f8c080a82c4d/12911_2024_2640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/8ddd7586d769/12911_2024_2640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/9bc67f03532d/12911_2024_2640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/59ae33fceec8/12911_2024_2640_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/f8c080a82c4d/12911_2024_2640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/8ddd7586d769/12911_2024_2640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/9bc67f03532d/12911_2024_2640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4e/11351256/59ae33fceec8/12911_2024_2640_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model to assess probability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with severe multiple traumas.基于机器学习的模型评估严重多发伤患者发生全身炎症反应综合征概率的开发和验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02640-x.
2
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
3
Allogenic blood transfusion in the first 24 hours after trauma is associated with increased systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and death.创伤后24小时内进行异体输血与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)增加及死亡相关。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Winter;5(4):395-404. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.395.
4
Development and validation of a diagnostic model for early differentiation of sepsis and non-infectious SIRS in critically ill children - a data-driven approach using machine-learning algorithms.危重症儿童脓毒症与非感染性全身炎症反应综合征早期鉴别诊断模型的开发与验证——一种使用机器学习算法的数据驱动方法
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1082-2.
5
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with spinal cord injury: does its presence at admission affect patient outcomes? Clinical article.脊髓损伤患者的全身炎症反应综合征:入院时的存在是否会影响患者的预后?临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):296-302. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13784. Epub 2014 May 16.
6
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.
7
Alterations in the systemic inflammatory response after early total care and damage control procedures for femoral shaft fracture in severely injured patients.严重创伤患者股骨干骨折早期全面治疗与损伤控制手术后全身炎症反应的变化
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):446-52; discussion 452-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000153942.28015.77.
8
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome between 24 and 48 h after ERCP predicts prolonged length of stay in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis: a retrospective study.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后 24-48 小时的全身炎症反应综合征预测胰腺炎患者的住院时间延长:一项回顾性研究。
Pancreatology. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
9
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
10
Utilizing predictive machine-learning modelling unveils feature-based risk assessment system for hyperinflammatory patterns and infectious outcomes in polytrauma.利用预测性机器学习模型揭示了一种基于特征的风险评估系统,用于评估多发伤中的过度炎症模式和感染结局。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 12;14:1281674. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1281674. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilizing predictive machine-learning modelling unveils feature-based risk assessment system for hyperinflammatory patterns and infectious outcomes in polytrauma.利用预测性机器学习模型揭示了一种基于特征的风险评估系统,用于评估多发伤中的过度炎症模式和感染结局。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 12;14:1281674. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1281674. eCollection 2023.
2
Neural-Cardiac Inflammasome Axis after Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后的神经-心脏炎性小体轴
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;16(10):1382. doi: 10.3390/ph16101382.
3
Development and validation of a web-based artificial intelligence prediction model to assess massive intraoperative blood loss for metastatic spinal disease using machine learning techniques.
开发和验证一种基于网络的人工智能预测模型,使用机器学习技术评估转移性脊柱疾病的术中大量失血。
Spine J. 2024 Jan;24(1):146-160. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Dissecting contributions of individual systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria from a prospective algorithm to the prediction and diagnosis of sepsis in a polytrauma cohort.剖析多创伤队列中个体全身炎症反应综合征标准对脓毒症预测和诊断的前瞻性算法的贡献。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 31;10:1227031. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1227031. eCollection 2023.
5
Development of a machine learning-based clinical decision support system to predict clinical deterioration in patients visiting the emergency department.基于机器学习的临床决策支持系统的开发,以预测急诊科就诊患者的临床恶化情况。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35617-3.
6
Development and validation of a patient-specific model to predict postoperative SIRS in older patients: A two-center study.开发和验证一种预测老年患者术后 SIRS 的个体化模型:一项多中心研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1145013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145013. eCollection 2023.
7
Standards of fracture care in polytrauma: results of a Europe-wide survey by the ESTES polytrauma section.多发伤骨折治疗的标准:欧洲创伤研究学会多发伤分会的一项全欧范围调查结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):671-678. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02126-3. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Acute Respiratory Failure in Individuals With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.用于预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者急性呼吸衰竭的机器学习模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 24;8:793230. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.793230. eCollection 2021.
9
The niche of artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency medicine.人工智能在创伤与急诊医学中的作用
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:669-670. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Artificial intelligence in trauma systems.创伤系统中的人工智能
Surgery. 2021 Jun;169(6):1295-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Sep 10.