• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Colony Reduction Effect of Two Wavelengths of Diode Lasers With Three Methods of Root Canal Irrigation: An In Vitro Study.两种波长二极管激光与三种根管冲洗方法的菌落减少效果比较:一项体外研究
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Aug 7;15:e37. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.37. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Antibacterial Effects of 810 and 980- nanometer Diode Lasers on Enterococcus Faecalis in the Root Canal System -An study.810纳米和980纳米二极管激光对根管系统中粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较——一项研究。
Laser Ther. 2016 Oct 1;25(3):209-214. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-17.
3
Efficacy of Erbium, Chromium-doped Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium and Garnet Laser-activated Irrigation Compared with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Conventional Irrigation, and Photodynamic Therapy against .掺铒、铬的钇、钪、镓石榴石激光激活冲洗与被动超声冲洗、传统冲洗及光动力疗法相比对……的疗效
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):11-16.
4
Entrococcus faecalis Elimination in Root Canals Using Silver Nanoparticles, Photodynamic Therapy, Diode Laser, or Laser-activated Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.使用银纳米颗粒、光动力疗法、二极管激光或激光激活纳米颗粒消除根管内粪肠球菌:一项体外研究
J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
5
Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of 445 and 970 nm Diode Laser Irradiation with Photodynamic Therapy and Triple Antibiotic Paste on in the Root Canal: an Study.445纳米和970纳米二极管激光照射联合光动力疗法与三联抗生素糊剂对根管内微生物抗菌效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Mar;19(1):57-65. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.57.
6
Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy, diode laser, and sodium hypochlorite and their combinations on endodontic pathogens.光动力疗法、二极管激光、次氯酸钠及其组合对根管病原体的抗菌效果。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Dec;28:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of a high-power diode laser, photo-activated disinfection, conventional and sonic activated irrigation during root canal treatment.高强度半导体激光、光动力消毒、常规冲洗和超声冲洗在根管治疗中的抗菌效果。
Int Endod J. 2013 Apr;46(4):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02120.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
8
Effect of different activations of silver nanoparticle irrigants on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis.不同激活方式的银纳米粒子冲洗液对粪肠球菌清除效果的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6893-6899. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03979-5. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
A comparison of the antibacterial activity of the two methods of photodynamic therapy (using diode laser 810 nm and LED lamp 630 nm) against Enterococcus faecalis in extracted human anterior teeth.两种光动力疗法(使用810nm二极管激光和630nm发光二极管灯)对拔除的人前牙中粪肠球菌抗菌活性的比较。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2016 Mar;13:233-237. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.07.171. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
10
An Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against , Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser.一项比较0.2%壳聚糖、3%次氯酸钠、2%氯己定单独及与二极管激光联合使用时抗菌效果的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):109-114. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a 940 nm Diode Laser and MTAD on the Decontamination of Root Canals With .940纳米二极管激光和MTAD对伴有……的根管消毒的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Nov 25;15:e57. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.57. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Diode Laser, Ultrasonic Activated and Conventional Irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl during RCT: An Interventional Study.二极管激光、超声激活和常规冲洗联合 2.5%次氯酸钠在 RCT 中抗菌效果的比较:一项干预性研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):669-673.
2
Comparison of Anti-Bacterial Efficacy between Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and 980 nm-GaAlAs Laser Application in Two Root Types.两种根管类型中被动超声冲洗与 980nm-GaAlAs 激光应用的抗菌疗效比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 27;57(6):537. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060537.
3
Influence of Adjuncts to Irrigation in the Disinfection of Large Root Canals.辅助冲洗对大根管消毒的影响。
J Endod. 2019 Mar;45(3):332-337. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.015.
4
Antimicrobial efficacy of 980 nm diode laser on in conjunction with various irrigation regimes in infected root canals: An study.980纳米二极管激光联合不同冲洗方案对感染根管的抗菌效果:一项研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):347-351. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_128_17.
5
Bactericidal effect of a diode laser on Enterococcus faecalis in human primary teeth-an in vitro study.二极管激光对人乳牙粪肠球菌的杀菌作用——一项体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0611-6.
6
Effectiveness of supplementary irrigant agitation with the Finisher GF Brush on the debridement of oval root canals instrumented with the Gentlefile or nickel titanium rotary instruments.成品 GF 刷辅助冲洗对 Gentlefile 或镍钛旋转器械预备的椭圆形根管的清创效果。
Int Endod J. 2018 Jul;51(7):800-807. doi: 10.1111/iej.12892. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
7
Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Diode Laser, Triphala, and Sodium Hypochlorite in Primary Root Canals: A Randomized Controlled Trial.二极管激光、三果汤和次氯酸钠在初治根管内抗菌效果的比较:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):14-17. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1399. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. unprepared 根管壁的变化:使用微计算机断层扫描和组织学/扫描电子显微镜的相关性分析。
Int Endod J. 2018 May;51(5):501-508. doi: 10.1111/iej.12753. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
The Effect of Diode Laser on Planktonic Enterococcus faecalis in Infected Root Canals in an Ex Vivo Model.二极管激光对离体模型中感染根管内浮游粪肠球菌的作用
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Apr;35(4):190-194. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4174. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
10
Comparison of Antibacterial Effects of 810 and 980- nanometer Diode Lasers on Enterococcus Faecalis in the Root Canal System -An study.810纳米和980纳米二极管激光对根管系统中粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较——一项研究。
Laser Ther. 2016 Oct 1;25(3):209-214. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-17.

两种波长二极管激光与三种根管冲洗方法的菌落减少效果比较:一项体外研究

Comparison of the Colony Reduction Effect of Two Wavelengths of Diode Lasers With Three Methods of Root Canal Irrigation: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Shirani Lapari Shiva, Zare Jahromi Maryam, Tahmourespour Arezoo, Shirani Amir Mansour

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Aug 7;15:e37. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.37. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.37
PMID:39193109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11348442/
Abstract

The basis of successful root canal therapy is the reduction of microorganisms. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the antibacterial effect of three different irrigation methods with two laser wavelengths on biofilm. Ninety-five single-canal teeth were prepared, sterilized, and divided randomly into a negative control, a positive control, and five test groups. They were inoculated with the standard strain of . The test groups were conventional irrigation (group 1), Passive ultrasonic irrigation (group 2), Gentle file finisher brush (group 3), 810 nm diode laser (group 4), and 980 nm diode laser (group 5). Microbial sampling, cultivation, and colony counting were done. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and a negative binomial regression model. There was a significant difference in the colony count between the groups (<0.001). the 810 nm diode had the highest and the conventional irrigation group had the lowest reduction in the microbial load. Passive ultrasonic, 980 nm diode laser, and Gentle file finisher brush groups were also ranked respectively from the highest to the lowest in terms of decreasing effect on the number of colonies. The 810 nm diode laser and conventional irrigation were respectively the most and the least effective methods for reducing the number of colonies.

摘要

成功进行根管治疗的基础是减少微生物。本体外研究的目的是比较三种不同冲洗方法与两种激光波长对生物膜的抗菌效果。制备、消毒95颗单根管牙齿,并随机分为阴性对照组、阳性对照组和五个试验组。用……的标准菌株对它们进行接种。试验组分别为传统冲洗(第1组)、被动超声冲洗(第2组)、轻柔锉光整刷(第3组)、810nm二极管激光(第4组)和980nm二极管激光(第5组)。进行微生物采样、培养和菌落计数。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和负二项回归模型进行分析。各组之间的菌落计数存在显著差异(<0.001)。810nm二极管激光对微生物负荷的降低最高,传统冲洗组最低。被动超声、980nm二极管激光和轻柔锉光整刷组在对菌落数量的降低效果方面也分别从高到低排序。810nm二极管激光和传统冲洗分别是减少菌落数量最有效和最无效的方法。