Suppr超能文献

体积吸收微采样(VAMS)与高分辨率、精确质量(HRAM)质谱联用,作为干血斑(DBS)分析的一种简化替代方法,用于心血管药物的治疗药物监测。

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) coupled with high-resolution, accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry as a simplified alternative to dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of cardiovascular drugs.

作者信息

Tanna Sangeeta, Alalaqi Ahmed, Bernieh Dennis, Lawson Graham

机构信息

Leicester School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.

出版信息

Clin Mass Spectrom. 2018 Aug 4;10:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Here, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), used for the measurement of cardiovascular drugs, is compared against conventional dried blood spot (DBS) card sampling to evaluate adherence to prescribed medication. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an attractive alternative to plasma sampling for routine drug monitoring and potentially overcomes haematocrit issues associated with quantitative bioanalysis of conventional dried blood spots. A quantitative VAMS-based LC-HRAM MS assay for atenolol, lisinopril, simvastatin and valsartan was developed and validated. The assay demonstrated acceptable linearity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery and insignificant matrix effects with no impact of haematocrit on assay accuracy. Volunteers provided both VAMS and DBS 903 card samples (the current standard) to allow comparison of the two methods and demonstrate the potential utility of VAMS. Analysis of VAMS samples correctly identified drugs in volunteers known to be adherent, and found no false positives from volunteers known to be taking no medication. There was a strong correlation between the two sampling systems confirming the utility of VAMS. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in deciding how to proceed with treatment in the event of poor improvement in patient health. VAMS could offer a potentially more efficient method of sample collection, with fewer rejected samples than the DBS approach.

摘要

在此,将用于测量心血管药物的体积吸收微量采样(VAMS)与传统的干血斑(DBS)卡采样进行比较,以评估对规定药物的依从性。体积吸收微量采样(VAMS)是用于常规药物监测的血浆采样的一种有吸引力的替代方法,并且可能克服与传统干血斑定量生物分析相关的血细胞比容问题。开发并验证了一种基于VAMS的用于阿替洛尔、赖诺普利、辛伐他汀和缬沙坦的定量LC-HRAM MS测定法。该测定法显示出可接受的线性、选择性、准确性、精密度、回收率,且基质效应不显著,血细胞比容对测定准确性无影响。志愿者提供了VAMS和DBS 903卡样本(当前标准),以便比较这两种方法并证明VAMS的潜在效用。对VAMS样本的分析正确识别了已知依从的志愿者体内的药物,且未发现已知未服药志愿者的假阳性结果。两种采样系统之间存在很强的相关性,证实了VAMS的效用。治疗药物监测(TDM)可以帮助临床医生在患者健康改善不佳的情况下决定如何进行治疗。VAMS可能提供一种潜在更有效的样本采集方法,与DBS方法相比,被拒收的样本更少。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Volumetric absorptive microsampling: Current advances and applications.体积吸收微采样:当前进展与应用。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Jan 5;147:288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Cardiovascular drug determination in bioanalysis: an update.生物分析中心血管药物的测定:最新进展
Bioanalysis. 2015 Sep;7(18):2399-2417. doi: 10.4155/bio.15.163. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验