School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Nov;38(11):1429-1445. doi: 10.1177/02692155241271047. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
To understand the nature and effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving informal stroke caregiver burden, stress, and strain.
In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted in May 2022.
Studies were eligible if they included an intervention designed for informal stroke caregivers, reported on caregiver burden, strain, or stress, were published in English, and used a randomized controlled trial design. An updated search was conducted in June 2024. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for caregiver burden and strain outcomes.
Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Interventions ranged from 4 days to 12 months. Most studies incorporated educational and/or support components. Meta-analyses revealed nonsignificant effects on caregiver burden or strain. Significant between-group differences for caregiver strain and burden were, however, found in seven studies.
Limited studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results made definitive conclusions on the most effective intervention characteristics for improving caregiver outcomes difficult. Of the 19 studies, seven found significant between-group differences for caregiver outcomes postintervention, and these tended to incorporate educational components and comprised between seven and nine sessions. Further high-quality research is required to identify optimal format, duration, and frequency for improving caregiver outcomes.
了解旨在改善非专业脑卒中照护者负担、压力和紧张的干预措施的性质和效果。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的要求,于 2022 年 5 月对 CENTRAL、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、APA PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索。
如果研究包括为非专业脑卒中照护者设计的干预措施,报告了照护者负担、压力或紧张情况,以英文发表且采用随机对照试验设计,则符合纳入标准。2024 年 6 月进行了更新检索。使用 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具评估研究的方法学质量。对数据进行了汇总,并对照护者负担和压力结局进行了荟萃分析。
19 项研究符合纳入标准并进行了荟萃分析。干预措施的持续时间从 4 天到 12 个月不等。大多数研究都包含了教育和/或支持内容。荟萃分析显示,干预措施对照护者负担或压力没有显著影响。然而,在 7 项研究中发现了照护者压力和负担的组间显著差异。
由于研究数量有限、样本量小以及结果相互矛盾,难以确定改善照护者结局的最有效干预措施特征。在这 19 项研究中,有 7 项研究发现干预后照护者结局存在显著的组间差异,这些研究往往包含教育内容,且包含 7 到 9 个疗程。需要进一步开展高质量的研究,以确定改善照护者结局的最佳模式、持续时间和频率。