Modiga Cristina, Stoia Andreea, Leretter Marius Traian, Chiş Ana Codruţa, Ardelean Andreea-Violeta, Azar Edward-Ronald, Kapor Gabriel, Pop Daniela-Maria, Romînu Mihai, Sinescu Cosmin, Negruţiu Meda-Lavinia, Petrescu Emanuela-Lidia
Department of Prostheses Technology and Dental Materials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeş" Timișoara, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeş" Timișoara, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Aug 21;15(8):234. doi: 10.3390/jfb15080234.
Removable prostheses have seen a fundamental change recently because of advances in polymer materials, allowing improved durability and performance. Despite these advancements, notable differences still occur amongst various polymer materials and processing technologies, requiring a thorough grasp of their mechanical, physical, and therapeutic implications. The compressive strength of dentures manufactured using various technologies will be investigated.
Traditional, injection molding, and additive and subtractive CAD/CAM processing techniques, all utilizing Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as the main material, were used to construct complete dentures. The specimens underwent a compressive mechanical test, which reveals the differences in compressive strength.
All the specimens broke under the influence of a certain force, rather than yielding through flow, as is characteristic for plastic materials. For each specimen, the maximum force (N) was recorded, as well as the breaking energy. The mean force required to break the dentures for each processing technology is as follows: 4.54 kN for traditional packing-press technique, 17.92 kN for the injection molding technique, 1.51 kN for the additive CAD/CAM dentures, and 5.9 kN for the subtractive CAD/CAM dentures.
The best results were obtained in the case of the thermoplastic injection system and the worst results were recorded in the case of 3D printed samples. Another important aspect depicted is the standard deviation for each group, which reveal a relatively unstable property for the thermoplastic injected dentures. Good results here in terms of absolute property and stability of the property can be conferred to CAD/CAM milled group.
由于聚合物材料的进步,可摘义齿最近发生了根本性的变化,使其耐用性和性能得到了改善。尽管有这些进步,但各种聚合物材料和加工技术之间仍存在显著差异,这就需要全面掌握它们的机械、物理和治疗意义。将研究使用各种技术制造的假牙的抗压强度。
采用传统、注塑以及增减材CAD/CAM加工技术,均以聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)作为主要材料来制作全口义齿。对标本进行抗压力学测试,以揭示抗压强度的差异。
所有标本均在一定力的作用下断裂,而非像塑料材料那样通过流动屈服。记录每个标本的最大力(N)以及断裂能量。每种加工技术的假牙断裂所需的平均力如下:传统填压技术为4.54 kN,注塑技术为17.92 kN,增材CAD/CAM假牙为1.51 kN,减材CAD/CAM假牙为5.9 kN。
热塑性注塑系统的效果最佳,3D打印样本的效果最差。所描述的另一个重要方面是每组的标准偏差,这表明热塑性注塑假牙的性能相对不稳定。在绝对性能和性能稳定性方面,CAD/CAM铣削组能取得良好效果。