The Danish Centre of Psychotraumatology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Applied Research in Education and Social Sciences, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2392414. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2392414. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
International research has established that children and adolescents are at high risk for being exposed to violence. A systematic review published in 2023 recommended six child and adolescent self-report violence against children (VAC) measures, based on their psychometric properties, in a systematic COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) review. However, the degree of overlap and heterogeneity was not part of the analysis. To compare the six measures with respect to item overlap and differences concerning specification of exposure dimensions. A content analysis of the original 174 items resulted in a reduction to 38 unique items. These items were organized visually in a co-occurrence circle using an adapted version of Fried's R code. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of event lists was performed using the Jaccard index. There was a modest overlap among the six measures. Only one item was present in all six measures, only two items were present in four measures, and 78% of the items were present in just one or two measures. The overall overlap between the six measures was 25%. The lack of overlap among measures reflects a heterogeneity of definitions and purposes. It also impedes progress in research, as comparisons between various studies are difficult to make in a valid and reliable way. The lack of consensus also delays efficient political initiatives, because solid, consensual knowledge about the prevalence of VAC does not exist.
国际研究已经证实,儿童和青少年面临着遭受暴力的高风险。2023 年发表的一项系统评价建议,根据心理测量学特性,在系统一致性共识基础上选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)评价中,使用六种儿童和青少年自我报告的针对儿童的暴力(VAC)测量方法。然而,分析中并未涉及重叠和异质性的程度。为了比较这六种方法在项目重叠和暴露维度说明方面的差异。对原始的 174 个项目进行内容分析,结果减少到 38 个独特的项目。使用改编的 Fried 的 R 代码,将这些项目以共现圈的形式进行可视化组织。此外,还使用杰卡德指数对事件列表进行了成对比较。这六种方法之间存在适度的重叠。只有一个项目存在于所有六种方法中,只有两个项目存在于四种方法中,78%的项目只存在于一种或两种方法中。六种方法之间的总体重叠率为 25%。方法之间缺乏重叠反映了定义和目的的异质性。这也阻碍了研究的进展,因为难以以有效和可靠的方式对各种研究进行比较。缺乏共识也会延迟有效的政治举措,因为关于 VAC 流行率的可靠共识知识尚不存在。