Second Department of Surgery- Division of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Nov;40(11):2305-2315. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03228-2. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Existing evidence of the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) on cardiac systolic function is scarce and inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the effects induced by a single injection of SA for elective vascular surgery on left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic performance using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). A prospective study. Single-center study, university hospital. Adult patients undergoing elective vascular surgery with SA. During patients' evaluations fluid administration was targeted using arterial waveform monitoring. All patients underwent TTE studies before and after SA induction for the assessment of indices reflective of LV and RV systolic function. Blood samples were drawn to measure troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. A total of 62 patients (88.7% males, 71.00 ± 9.42 years) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the difference before and after SA in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). In total population, LVEF significantly increased after SA 53.07% [16.51]vs 53.86% [13.28]; p < 0.001). End-systolic volume (ESV, 69.50 [51.50] vs. 65.00 [29.50] ml; p < 0.001) decreased while stroke volume (SV) insignificantly increased (70.51 ± 16.70 vs. 73.00 ± 18.76 ml; p = 0.131) during SA. TAPSE remained unchanged (2.23 [0.56] vs. 2.25 [0.69] mm; p = 0.558). In patients with impaired compared to those with preserved LV systolic function, the changes evidenced in LVEF (7.49 ± 4.15 vs. 0.59 ± 2.79; p < 0.001), ESV (-18.13 ± 18.20 vs-1.53 ± 9.09; p < 0.001) and SV (8.71 ± 11.96 vs-1.43 ± 11.89; p = 0.002) were greater. This study provides evidence that SA in patients undergoing elective vascular surgery improved LV systolic function, while changes in RV systolic function are minimal.
现有的关于椎管内麻醉(SA)对左心室(LV)收缩功能影响的证据很少且不一致。本研究旨在使用经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估择期血管手术患者单次 SA 注射引起的左心室和右心室(RV)收缩功能的变化。
一项前瞻性研究。单中心研究,大学医院。择期血管手术合并 SA 的成年患者。在患者评估过程中,通过动脉波形监测来指导液体输注。所有患者在接受 SA 诱导前后均进行 TTE 研究,以评估反映 LV 和 RV 收缩功能的指数。抽取血样测量肌钙蛋白和脑利钠肽(BNP)水平。共纳入 62 例患者(男性 88.7%,71.00±9.42 岁)。主要结局是 SA 前后 LV 射血分数(LVEF)和三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)的差异。在总体人群中,SA 后 LVEF 显著增加,从 53.07%[16.51]增加到 53.86%[13.28];p<0.001)。收缩末期容积(ESV,69.50[51.50] vs. 65.00[29.50] ml;p<0.001)下降,而每搏量(SV)仅略有增加(70.51±16.70 vs. 73.00±18.76 ml;p=0.131)。TAPSE 保持不变(2.23[0.56] vs. 2.25[0.69] mm;p=0.558)。与左心室收缩功能正常的患者相比,左心室收缩功能受损的患者的 LVEF(7.49±4.15 vs. 0.59±2.79;p<0.001)、ESV(-18.13±18.20 vs. -1.53±9.09;p<0.001)和 SV(8.71±11.96 vs. -1.43±11.89;p=0.002)的变化更大。
本研究表明,择期血管手术患者接受 SA 后,左心室收缩功能得到改善,而右心室收缩功能的变化很小。