Suppr超能文献

一个断裂的环节:碳水化合物需求知识并不能预测耐力运动员在比赛前后的碳水化合物摄入量。

A broken link: Knowledge of carbohydrate requirements do not predict carbohydrate intake around competition in endurance athletes.

机构信息

Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Oct;24(10):1395-1404. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12183. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

Abstract

Endurance athletes fail to meet carbohydrate (CHO) guidelines for competition, which may be due to limited knowledge. However, the relationship between knowledge and practice in this population is unknown. To investigate this, we assessed the dietary intake in 50 athletes (37 females) who completed endurance events ≥2.5 h in duration and compared CHO intake against the carbohydrates for endurance athletes in competition questionnaire validated nutrition knowledge questionnaire, with specific questions related to CHO loading, pre-competition meal and during-competition intake. CHO-loading guidelines (10-12 g · kg · day) were met in practice by n = 5 (10%), but there was no relationship between identified requirements (range 0-12 g · kg · day) and actual intake (r = 0.133, p = 0.358), with the n = 18 (36%) who correctly identified requirements, ingesting 6.1 ± 1.9 g · kg · day. CHO intake for pre-competition meal guidelines (1-4 g · kg) was met in practice by n = 40 (80%), but there was no relationship between identified requirements (range 0 to >4 g · kg) and actual intake (r = 0.101, p = 0.487), with n = 19 (38%) who correctly identified guidelines requirements, ingesting 1.4 ± 0.6 g · kg. CHO intake during-competition guidelines (60-90 g · h) was met in practice by n = 18 (36%), but there was no relationship between the amounts of CHO required (range 30 to >90 g/h) and actual intake (r = 0.028, p = 0.849), with n = 32 (64%) who correctly identified guidelines requirements, ingesting 56 ± 20 g · h. Results show no relationship between the knowledge of CHO recommendations and practice, suggesting that theoretical knowledge does not guarantee the achievement of best practice and other important factors may ultimately determine practice.

摘要

耐力运动员在比赛中未能达到碳水化合物(CHO)的指导方针,这可能是由于知识有限。然而,目前尚不清楚这一人群中知识与实践之间的关系。为了研究这一点,我们评估了 50 名完成持续时间≥2.5 小时的耐力项目的运动员的饮食摄入量,并将 CHO 摄入量与经过验证的营养知识问卷中的耐力运动员比赛用 CHO 摄入量进行了比较,该问卷包含与 CHO 负荷、比赛前饮食和比赛中摄入有关的具体问题。在实践中,n=5(10%)满足 CHO 负荷指南(10-12g·kg·day),但确定的需求(范围 0-12g·kg·day)与实际摄入量之间没有关系(r=0.133,p=0.358),n=18(36%)正确识别需求的运动员,摄入 6.1±1.9g·kg·day。在实践中,n=40(80%)满足比赛前饮食指南(1-4g·kg)的要求,但确定的需求(范围 0 至>4g·kg)与实际摄入量之间没有关系(r=0.101,p=0.487),n=19(38%)正确识别指南要求的运动员,摄入 1.4±0.6g·kg。在实践中,n=18(36%)满足比赛中 CHO 摄入量指南(60-90g·h)的要求,但所需 CHO 量(范围 30 至>90g/h)与实际摄入量之间没有关系(r=0.028,p=0.849),n=32(64%)正确识别指南要求的运动员,摄入 56±20g·h。结果表明,CHO 推荐知识与实践之间没有关系,这表明理论知识并不能保证最佳实践的实现,其他重要因素最终可能决定实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4a2/11451575/b13a7e2469e8/EJSC-24-1395-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验