Demirtaş-Zorbaz Selen, Ulaş Kılıç Özlem, Akın Arıkan Çiğdem
Department of Guidance and Counselling, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Department of Guidance and Counselling, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkiye.
Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug 28:332941241278327. doi: 10.1177/00332941241278327.
The concept of career adaptability emerged from the broader field of career development theory and has received increasing attention in the past two decades. To measure career adaptability, there are different scale development studies in the literature, but the most widely used and preferred one is the Career Adapt-abilities Scale developed by Savickas and Porfeli. Therefore, in the present study, the general reliability of the Career Adapt-abilities Scale was measured through meta-analysis. One hundred forty nine study ( = 82519) were included in the analyses. For the CAAS overall score, the average reliability coefficient among the 171 reliability estimations was high. However, reliability estimates in the studies included in the research show high heterogeneity. As a result of the moderator analysis, it was concluded that reliability estimates of these scores differ by item level, culture, language, category of items, different forms of CAAS, age, and SD. Regarding the application of the CAAS in research, the consequences of these findings are discussed in light of the relevant literature.
职业适应性的概念源自更广泛的职业发展理论领域,在过去二十年中受到越来越多的关注。为了衡量职业适应性,文献中有不同的量表开发研究,但使用最广泛且最受青睐的是由萨维卡斯和波尔费利开发的职业适应能力量表。因此,在本研究中,通过元分析来测量职业适应能力量表的总体信度。分析纳入了149项研究(n = 82519)。对于职业适应能力量表总分,171个信度估计值中的平均信度系数较高。然而,纳入研究中的信度估计显示出高度异质性。通过调节效应分析得出结论,这些分数的信度估计在项目水平、文化、语言、项目类别、职业适应能力量表的不同形式、年龄和标准差方面存在差异。关于职业适应能力量表在研究中的应用,将根据相关文献讨论这些发现的后果。