Noise exposure of the inner ear during robotic drilling.

INTRODUCTION

Preserving the cochlear structures and thus hearing preservation, has become a prominent topic of discussion in cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Various approaches and soft surgical techniques have been described when approaching the inner ear. Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) reaches the round window in a minimally invasive manner by following a trajectory of minimal trauma. This involves the drilling of a keyhole trajectory to the round window, through the facial recess, with no need for a complete mastoidectomy. It involves less drilling, less drilling time and less structural damage. A lot of attention has been paid to the structural traumatic causes of hearing loss but acoustic trauma during the exposure of the inner ear appears to be neglected topic.

AIM

The aim was to measure the noise exposure of the inner ear during the robotic drilling of the mastoid and bony overhang of the round window. The results were compared with the milling in conventional cochlear implantation surgery.

INTERVENTION

RACIS on fresh frozen human cadavers.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The equivalent frequency-weighted and time-averaged sound pressure level L in dB and the noise dose in % derived from a noise damage model, both obtained during RACIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The robotic drilling of 6 trajectories towards the inner ear were performed, including 4 trajectories through round window access and 2 trajectories through cochleostomy. The results were compared with the data of 7 cases of conventional CI surgery that have been described in literature. The induced equivalent sound pressure level L was determined via an accelleration sensor at the zygomatic arch and a calibration according to bone conduction audiometry. A noise dose for the whole procedure was calculated from the equivalent sound pressure level L and the exposure time using a noise damage model. A noise dose of 100% is considered a critical exposure limit and values above are considered potentially harmful, with the risk of hearing impairment.

RESULTS

The maximum L was 82 dB during fiducial screw placement; 87 dB during middle ear access; 95 dB for the accesses through the round window and 88 dB for the accesses through cochleostomy. The noise dose due to the HEARO-procedure was always far below the critical value of 100%. There was no acoustic trauma of the inner ear in all cases with the noise dose being smaller than 0.1% in five out of the six cases. The maximum L in the seven cases of conventional CI surgery was 118 dB with a maximum cumulative noise dose of 172.6%. The critical exposure limit of 100% was exceeded in three cases of conventional CI surgery.

CONCLUSION

RACIS provokes significantly less acoustic trauma than conventional mastoid surgery in our findings. There were no observable differences in noise exposure levels between a cochleostomy or a round window approach where the bony overhang needed to be drilled.