Suppr超能文献

英国家长和医疗保健提供者对《英格兰健康儿童计划》的态度:一项定性分析。

Parental and healthcare provider attitudes towards the Healthy Child Programme in England: a qualitative analysis.

机构信息

Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2342. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19515-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Healthy Child Programme (HCP) in England, delivered by Health Visitors (HV) and Nursery Nurses (NN), aims to assess growth and development in pre-school age children. This qualitative analysis aimed to evaluate the perceptions and experiences of HCP providers and parents located in a London borough.

METHODS

This qualitative analysis is part of a larger study piloting an automated growth screening algorithm in a London borough. We conducted three focus group discussions; two with parents of pre-school children participating in the pilot study, one in English (n = 6) and one in Sylheti (n = 5), and one with HVs and NNs (n = 11). Sampling was purposeful, and written informed consent was obtained. Groups were facilitated by the same bilingual researcher using semi-structured topic guides. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and assessed for intercoder reliability.

RESULTS

Three broad themes were identified in the data: (1) lack of clarity around the role of the HV and NN; (2) a lack of resources; and (3) a desire for a preventative service. Underlying these themes was a sense of disempowerment shown by HVs/NNs and parents, as well as systemic issues in terms of the accessibility and practicality of the service. Nevertheless, parents and HVs/NNs all stressed the importance of the service in providing information, reassurance and advice.

CONCLUSIONS

Various challenges prevent the HCP from providing equitable and effective care to every child. However, the service was recognised as very valuable by users and providers despite systemic difficulties.

摘要

背景

英国的“健康儿童计划”(HCP)由健康访视员(HV)和托儿所护士(NN)实施,旨在评估学龄前儿童的生长发育情况。本定性分析旨在评估位于伦敦某行政区的 HCP 提供者和家长对该计划的看法和体验。

方法

本定性分析是在伦敦某行政区试点自动化生长筛查算法的更大规模研究的一部分。我们进行了三次焦点小组讨论;两次是针对参与试点研究的学龄前儿童的家长,一次是英文(n=6),一次是 Sylheti 语(n=5),一次是 HV 和 NN(n=11)。抽样是有目的的,并且获得了书面知情同意。由同一位双语研究人员使用半结构化主题指南来主持小组讨论。使用反思性主题分析对数据进行分析,并评估编码者间的可靠性。

结果

数据中确定了三个广泛的主题:(1)HV 和 NN 角色不明确;(2)资源匮乏;(3)需要预防性服务。这些主题的背后是 HV/NN 和家长表现出的无力感,以及服务的可及性和实用性方面的系统性问题。尽管如此,家长和 HV/NN 都强调了该服务在提供信息、安心和建议方面的重要性。

结论

各种挑战使得 HCP 无法为每个孩子提供公平有效的护理。然而,尽管存在系统性困难,用户和提供者仍认为该服务非常有价值。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.公共卫生干预措施的投资回报:系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-834. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208141. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验