• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单孔机器人系统与电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行剑突下单孔机器人胸腺切除术:一项多机构、回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究。

Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study.

作者信息

Lee Jun Hee, Hwang Jinwook, Park Tae Hyun, Gu Byung Mo, Jung Younggi, Yi Eunjue, Lee Sungho, Hwang Soon Young, Chung Jae Ho, Kim Hyun Koo

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;16(16):2856. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162856.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16162856
PMID:39199627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353098/
Abstract

Subxiphoid thymectomy is a novel alternative to the transthoracic approach and sternotomy, with potential benefits, such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. We previously reported the initial experience with subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (SRATS) thymectomy using the single-port robotic system (SPS). However, the efficacy of this technique remains unknown. Thus, this study examined the multi-institutional experience with SRATS thymectomy and compared the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) thymectomy. The data of patients who underwent subxiphoid SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, performed by three thoracic surgeons at three institutions between September 2018 and May 2024, were retrospectively collected. In total, 110 patients were included, with 85 and 25 undergoing SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, respectively. After propensity score matching, 25 patients were included in each group. The SRATS group was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery (0% vs. 20%, = 0.05), shorter chest tube drainage duration (1.32 ± 0.75 vs. 2.00 ± 1.29 days, = 0.003), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.52 ± 1.00 vs. 5.08 ± 5.20 days, = 0.003). Subxiphoid SRATS thymectomy using the SPS is feasible and is a good alternative to conventional thymectomy. Further studies are necessary to confirm its benefits.

摘要

剑突下胸腺切除术是一种替代经胸入路和胸骨切开术的新方法,具有潜在的益处,如减轻术后疼痛和加快恢复。我们之前报告了使用单孔机器人系统(SPS)进行剑突下单孔机器人辅助胸外科手术(SRATS)胸腺切除术的初步经验。然而,该技术的疗效尚不清楚。因此,本研究考察了SRATS胸腺切除术的多机构经验,并将该技术的围手术期结果与剑突下单孔电视辅助胸外科手术(SVATS)胸腺切除术的结果进行了比较。回顾性收集了2018年9月至2024年5月期间在三个机构由三位胸外科医生进行剑突下SRATS和SVATS胸腺切除术的患者数据。总共纳入了110例患者,其中85例和25例分别接受了SRATS和SVATS胸腺切除术。经过倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入25例患者。SRATS组转为多端口手术的发生率较低(0%对20%,P = 0.05),胸管引流时间较短(1.32±0.75天对2.00±1.29天,P = 0.003),术后住院时间较短(2.52±1.00天对5.08±5.20天,P = 0.003)。使用SPS进行剑突下SRATS胸腺切除术是可行的,是传统胸腺切除术的良好替代方法。需要进一步研究以证实其益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/86b7ad819faa/cancers-16-02856-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/4bb29a201558/cancers-16-02856-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/a4adbb9b6ebf/cancers-16-02856-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/d08db8a66b58/cancers-16-02856-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/2126bf90a943/cancers-16-02856-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/86b7ad819faa/cancers-16-02856-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/4bb29a201558/cancers-16-02856-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/a4adbb9b6ebf/cancers-16-02856-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/d08db8a66b58/cancers-16-02856-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/2126bf90a943/cancers-16-02856-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31bc/11353098/86b7ad819faa/cancers-16-02856-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study.使用单孔机器人系统与电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行剑突下单孔机器人胸腺切除术:一项多机构、回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;16(16):2856. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162856.
2
Clinical study of thoracoscopic assisted different surgical approaches for early thymoma: a meta-analysis.胸腔镜辅助不同手术入路治疗早期胸腺瘤的临床研究:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11832-7.
3
Double sternal elevation subxiphoid versus uniportal thoracoscopic thymectomy associated with superior clearance for stage I-II thymic epithelial tumors: Subxiphoid thymectomy compared with VATS.剑突下双胸骨抬高术与单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期胸腺上皮肿瘤的上纵隔清扫效果比较:剑突下胸腺切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术的对比
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.034. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
Perioperative outcomes and survival of modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy for T thymic malignancies: A retrospective comparison study.改良剑突下入路胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗 T 胸腺恶性肿瘤的围手术期结局和生存:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Dec;168(6):1550-1559.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
5
Subxiphoid versus lateral intercostal approaches thoracoscopic thymectomy for non-myasthenic early-stage thymoma: A propensity score -matched analysis.剑突下入路与侧胸壁入路胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗非重症肌无力早期胸腺瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Surgical outcomes of thoracoscopic thymectomy via the single-port subxiphoid approach versus the unilateral intercostal approach.经剑突下单孔法与单侧肋间法胸腔镜胸腺切除术的手术效果比较
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;37(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad141.
7
Subxiphoid single-port thymectomy: six-year experience of a single center.剑突下单孔胸腺切除术:单中心六年经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Oct;91(10):2188-2191. doi: 10.1111/ans.17139. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
Meta-analysis of subxiphoid approach versus lateral approach for thoracoscopic Thymectomy.剑突下入路与外侧入路胸腔镜下胸腺切除术的Meta分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 12;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01135-w.
9
Subxiphoid thymectomy: single-port, dual-port, and robot-assisted.剑突下胸腺切除术:单孔、双孔及机器人辅助手术。
J Vis Surg. 2017 May 26;3:75. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.05.07. eCollection 2017.
10
The Outcomes of Subxiphoid Thoracoscopic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymic Diseases.剑突下胸腔镜手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺疾病的疗效比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):508-513. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0734. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subxiphoid Approach.经剑突下入路使用单孔机器人系统行机器人胸腺切除术。
J Chest Surg. 2025 Sep 5;58(5):167-174. doi: 10.5090/jcs.25.041. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Thymectomy for Thymoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助、电视辅助和开放性胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤的比较效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85806. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85806. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a retrospective observational review of outcomes for patients diagnosed with thymomatous and non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic thoracic surgery using the single-port robotic system: Initial experience with more than 100 cases.机器人单孔胸腔镜手术:100 余例初步经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Dec;168(6):1513-1522.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
2
Robot versus video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for large thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人与电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗大胸腺上皮肿瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02228-8.
3
A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis: Robotic Thymectomy Through the Subxiphoid Has Advantages Over Video-Assisted Thymectomy Surgery.
吉隆坡医院的单孔电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术:对诊断为胸腺瘤性和非胸腺瘤性重症肌无力患者的结局进行回顾性观察研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):7446-7457. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-830. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
倾向评分匹配分析:经剑突下入路机器人胸腺切除术优于胸腔镜辅助胸腺切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Sep;33(9):859-865. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0124. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Biportal robotic surgery for anterior mediastinal mass.双孔机器人手术治疗前纵隔肿物
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Mar 31;12(2):110-116. doi: 10.21037/acs-2022-urats-24. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
A subxiphoid uniportal approach for a surgical biopsy.
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 27;2023. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2022.106.
6
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术与胸骨切开术治疗胸腺切除术的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1048547. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1048547. eCollection 2022.
7
A Comparison of the Differences in Postoperative Chronic Pain Between Video-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Approaches in Thoracic Surgery.胸腔镜辅助与机器人辅助手术治疗胸外科术后慢性疼痛差异的比较
Cureus. 2022 Nov 20;14(11):e31688. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31688. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
A Brazilian randomized study: Robotic-Assisted vs. Video-assisted lung lobectomy Outcomes (BRAVO trial).巴西一项随机研究:机器人辅助与视频辅助肺叶切除术结果(BRAVO 试验)。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Jul 8;48(4):e20210464. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210464. eCollection 2022.
9
Initial experience with and surgical outcomes of da Vinci single-port system in general thoracic surgery.达芬奇单孔系统在普通胸外科手术中的初步经验及手术效果
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jun;14(6):1933-1940. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1739.
10
Effect Evaluation of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Thymectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.剑突下与肋间胸腺切除术的效果评估:一项Meta分析与系统评价
Front Surg. 2022 May 31;9:925003. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.925003. eCollection 2022.