• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查、诊断性乳房 X 光检查、住院治疗与乳腺癌死亡率之间的关系。

Relationship between Screening, Diagnostic Mammograms, Hospital Admissions, and Mortality Rates from Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Health Sciences Center, State University of Maringá-UEM, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil.

Secretary Health Curitiba, Curitiba 80060-240, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;21(8):1006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081006.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21081006
PMID:39200617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11354218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide. If diagnosed and treated early, it has a high chance of cure, and for this, screening tests are necessary, namely mammograms, which are the most commonly used. The objective of this study was to analyze the association between the number of screening and diagnostic mammograms and the number of hospitalizations and deaths from breast cancer.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, analytical, retrospective study with secondary data made available by the Ministry of Health. Pearson correlation analysis was employed to assess whether the number of mammograms is associated with the number of deaths and hospitalizations, Poisson regression was used to assess whether an increase in the number of mammograms and hospitalizations is related to the number of deaths, and the Cox-Stuart test was used to analyze the temporal trend of the variables under study and the projection of time series.

RESULTS

There was a strong positive correlation for all age groups when relating the variables hospitalizations and deaths, a moderate-to-strong correlation for the variables mammography and hospitalization, and a weak correlation for the variables mammography and death. There was no statistical significance in the relationship between the number of mammograms and deaths, whereas the hospitalization variable had a significant impact in relation to death, increasing the chance by 0.015%. There has also been a significant growth trend in the variables deaths and hospitalizations in Brazil over the years.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing trend was identified from 2013 to 2021, both in hospitalizations and deaths, thus suggesting that strategies aimed at reformulating public health policies are necessary for earlier diagnosis in order to improve the treatment of breast cancer and the prognosis of the disease.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是全球最常见的癌症类型。如果早期诊断和治疗,其治愈的可能性很高,为此,有必要进行筛查试验,即乳房 X 光检查,这是最常用的方法。本研究的目的是分析筛查和诊断性乳房 X 光检查的次数与乳腺癌住院和死亡人数之间的关系。

方法

这是一项横断面、分析性、回顾性研究,使用卫生部提供的二级数据。采用皮尔逊相关分析评估乳房 X 光检查次数与死亡和住院人数之间是否存在关联,采用泊松回归评估乳房 X 光检查次数和住院次数的增加是否与死亡人数相关,采用考克斯-斯图尔特检验分析研究变量的时间趋势和时间序列预测。

结果

在所有年龄组中,住院和死亡变量之间存在强烈的正相关,乳房 X 光和住院变量之间存在中度至强相关,而乳房 X 光和死亡变量之间存在弱相关。乳房 X 光检查次数与死亡之间没有统计学意义的关系,而住院变量与死亡之间有显著影响,使死亡机会增加 0.015%。多年来,巴西的死亡和住院变量也呈现出显著的增长趋势。

结论

从 2013 年到 2021 年,住院和死亡人数都呈现出增长趋势,这表明需要制定公共卫生政策改革策略,以便更早地诊断,从而改善乳腺癌的治疗和疾病预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5253/11354218/f1c0d4b89a87/ijerph-21-01006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5253/11354218/666fd2fea151/ijerph-21-01006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5253/11354218/f1c0d4b89a87/ijerph-21-01006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5253/11354218/666fd2fea151/ijerph-21-01006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5253/11354218/f1c0d4b89a87/ijerph-21-01006-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between Screening, Diagnostic Mammograms, Hospital Admissions, and Mortality Rates from Breast Cancer.筛查、诊断性乳房 X 光检查、住院治疗与乳腺癌死亡率之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;21(8):1006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081006.
2
Screening and hospitalization of breast and cervical cancer in Brazil from 2010 to 2022: A time-series study.2010 年至 2022 年巴西乳腺癌和宫颈癌的筛查和住院治疗:时间序列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0278011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278011. eCollection 2023.
3
10-year opportunistic mammographic screening scenario in Brazil and its impact on breast cancer early detection: a nationwide population-based study.巴西 10 年机会性乳腺 X 线筛查方案及其对乳腺癌早期检测的影响:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
J Glob Health. 2022 Oct 14;12:04061. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04061.
4
Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.阿曼的乳腺钼靶检查表现:影响癌症检出率和阳性预测值的因素综述
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e250-8. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12181. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.浸润性乳腺癌的失败分析:该疾病导致的大多数死亡发生在未定期筛查的女性中。
Cancer. 2014 Sep 15;120(18):2839-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28199. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
6
Temporal trend analysis of hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths due to female breast cancer in the state of Alagoas from 2009 to 2019: a cross-sectional study.2009 年至 2019 年巴伊亚州因女性乳腺癌住院和院内死亡的时间趋势分析:一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Mar 14;140(2):268-277. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0385.R1.23072021. eCollection 2022.
7
Maximizing the benefits of screening mammography for women 40-49 years old.最大化40至49岁女性乳腺钼靶筛查的益处。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):278-82.
8
Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.从 40 岁开始每年进行乳腺 X 线筛查以降低女性乳腺癌死亡率:英国年龄 RCT 的长期随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(55):1-24. doi: 10.3310/hta24550.
9
Breast cancer in Brazil: Screening program and surgical approach.巴西的乳腺癌:筛查计划和手术方法。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;73:101970. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101970. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.放射科医生的诊断检查工作量对解读表现的影响。
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Mortality due to Breast Cancer and Mammography Uptake in the Federative Units of Brazil-2015 to 2021.巴西联邦单位 2015 至 2021 年因乳腺癌和乳腺 X 光检查接受率导致的死亡率比较分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Jun 12;24(12):4339-4348. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4339.
2
Health Care Accessibility and Breast Cancer Mortality in Europe.欧洲的医疗保健可及性与乳腺癌死亡率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20):13605. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013605.
3
Change in effectiveness of mammography screening with decreasing breast cancer mortality: a population-based study.
乳腺癌死亡率降低背景下乳腺 X 线筛查效果的变化:基于人群的研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):630-635. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac047.
4
Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in Chinese women.中国女性的乳腺癌筛查与早期诊断
Cancer Biol Med. 2022 Apr 5;19(4):450-67. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0676.
5
[Oncological organized screening programmes in the COVID-19 era: an Italian survey on accrued delays, reboot velocity, and diagnostic delay estimates].[新冠疫情时代的肿瘤组织筛查项目:意大利关于累积延误、重启速度和诊断延误估计的调查]
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):344-352. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.136.
6
Cancer burden in China: trends, risk factors and prevention.中国癌症负担:趋势、风险因素与预防。
Cancer Biol Med. 2020 Nov 15;17(4):879-895. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0387. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Imaging.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对乳腺成像的影响。
Radiol Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;59(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a population-based breast cancer screening program.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对一项基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5202-5205. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33180. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Impact of COVID-19 on breast imaging case volumes in South Florida: A multicenter study.新型冠状病毒肺炎对南佛罗里达州乳腺影像病例量的影响:一项多中心研究。
Breast J. 2020 Nov;26(11):2316-2319. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14011. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
10
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.40 岁开始进行乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响(英国年龄试验):一项随机对照试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30398-3. Epub 2020 Aug 12.