• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2022 年 ESC/EACTS 联合对 2018 年指南建议的回顾:低手术风险且适合 PCI 或 CABG 解剖结构的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建。

2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI) Dublin, Mater Private Network, 73 Eccles St, Dublin D07 KWR1, Ireland.

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4310-4320. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad476.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad476
PMID:37632756
Abstract

In October 2021, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) jointly agreed to establish a Task Force (TF) to review recommendations of the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization as they apply to patients with left main (LM) disease with low-to-intermediate SYNTAX score (0-32). This followed the withdrawal of support by the EACTS in 2019 for the recommendations about the management of LM disease of the previous guideline. The TF was asked to review all new relevant data since the 2018 guidelines including updated aggregated data from the four randomized trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with LM disease. This document represents a summary of the work of the TF; suggested updated recommendations for the choice of revascularization modality in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization for LM disease are included. In stable patients with an indication for revascularization for LM disease, with coronary anatomy suitable for both procedures and a low predicted surgical mortality, the TF concludes that both treatment options are clinically reasonable based on patient preference, available expertise, and local operator volumes. The suggested recommendations for revascularization with CABG are Class I, Level of Evidence A. The recommendations for PCI are Class IIa, Level of Evidence A. The TF recognized several important gaps in knowledge related to revascularization in patients with LM disease and recognizes that aggregated data from the four randomized trials were still only large enough to exclude large differences in mortality.

摘要

2021 年 10 月,欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)共同商定成立一个工作组(TF),审查 2018 年 ESC/EACTS 心肌血运重建指南中适用于低至中 SYNTAX 评分(0-32)的左主干(LM)疾病患者的建议。此前,EACTS 于 2019 年撤回了对前一指南中 LM 疾病管理建议的支持。TF 被要求审查自 2018 年指南以来的所有新的相关数据,包括比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗 LM 疾病的四项随机试验的更新汇总数据。本文件代表 TF 工作的总结;包括对接受 LM 疾病心肌血运重建患者的血运重建方式选择的建议更新建议。在有 LM 疾病血运重建指征且冠状动脉解剖适合两种手术且预测手术死亡率低的稳定患者中,TF 得出结论,基于患者偏好、现有专业知识和当地操作人员数量,两种治疗选择在临床上都是合理的。建议 CABG 血运重建的推荐为 I 类,证据水平为 A。PCI 的建议为 IIa 类,证据水平为 A。TF 认识到与 LM 疾病患者血运重建相关的几个重要知识差距,并认识到四项随机试验的汇总数据仍然仅足以排除死亡率的巨大差异。

相似文献

1
2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG.2022 年 ESC/EACTS 联合对 2018 年指南建议的回顾:低手术风险且适合 PCI 或 CABG 解剖结构的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4310-4320. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad476.
2
2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG.2022 年 ESC/EACTS 联合对 2018 年指南建议的回顾:低手术风险且适合 PCI 或 CABG 解剖结构的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Aug 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad286.
3
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
4
Follow-Up and Outcome after Coronary Bypass Surgery Preceded by Coronary Stent Implantation.冠状动脉支架植入术后冠状动脉旁路移植术的随访和结果。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;72(6):423-434. doi: 10.1055/a-2107-0481. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗伴或不伴急性冠状动脉综合征的左主干病变患者:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting.左主干冠状动脉狭窄:药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008.
8
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
FFR-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者中,基于血流储备分数(FFR)指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jun 1;10(6):603-608. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0095.
10
Percutaneous or surgical revascularization in patients with severe left main coronary artery disease in Latin America: A GRADE clinical practice guideline.拉丁美洲严重左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的经皮或外科血管重建:GRADE临床实践指南
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Oct 1;436:133401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133401. Epub 2025 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: long-term outcomes.体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期疗效
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):5561-5574. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-634. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
2
OCT for Optimizing Long-Term Clinical Results in Left Main PCI-Dream or Reality? Results from a Single-Center High-Volume Registry.光学相干断层扫描用于优化左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结果——梦想还是现实?来自单中心高容量注册研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5824. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165824.
3
The Influence of Blood Transfusion Indexed to Patient Blood Volume on 5-Year Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-An EuroSCORE II Adjusted Spline Regression Analysis.
根据患者血容量调整输血对冠状动脉旁路移植术后5年死亡率的影响——一项欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II调整样条回归分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jul 28;12(8):287. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080287.
4
One-Year Prognostic Differences and Management Strategies between ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the PRAISE Registry.ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的一年预后差异及管理策略:来自PRAISE注册研究的见解
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00739-8.
5
Type 2 diabetes worsens the outcome of ischemia/reperfusion in female STEMI patients and female db/db mice with HFpEF cardiometabolic phenotype.2型糖尿病会使患有射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)心脏代谢表型的女性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者和雌性db/db小鼠的缺血/再灌注结果恶化。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Jun 7;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02771-z.
6
Stenting strategy and imaging use in left main percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a 15-year registry.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的支架置入策略与影像应用:来自一项15年注册研究的见解
Future Cardiol. 2025 Jul;21(9):693-700. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2511416. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
7
Left main stem disease: percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting-what about medical management? A case report.左主干病变:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术——药物治疗如何?病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2025 Feb 14;9(3):ytaf072. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf072. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
The European Society of Cardiology 2024 Guidelines on Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A Critical Appraisal.欧洲心脏病学会2024年慢性冠状动脉综合征指南:批判性评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1161. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041161.
9
Nanomedicine-based strategies for the treatment of vein graft disease.基于纳米医学的静脉移植物疾病治疗策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):255-272. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01094-y. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
10
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: 6 versus 12 Months.非保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:6个月与12个月对比
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5449. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185449.