Hodgson Christine R, Mehra Renee, Franck Linda S
School of Nursing, Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;11(8):949. doi: 10.3390/children11080949.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Family-centered care (FCC) is the recommended model for pediatric inpatient care. Our overall aim was to conduct a narrative synthesis of the contemporary published research on the effectiveness of FCC interventions for pediatric inpatients. Our specific objective was to critique studies of inpatient pediatric FCC interventions that evaluated child or parent outcomes.
We searched five databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, and Web of Science) for peer-reviewed research published from 1 January 2017 to 6 February 2024. Independent reviewers evaluated each study based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, then extracted and narratively synthesized the data.
We found 16 studies of 15 interventions conducted in six countries. The studies were quantitative ( = 11), qualitative ( = 3), and mixed methods ( = 2), with most designs being of low to moderate quality based on a modified Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Interventions included family-centered rounds, parent-focused health information technology, education, patient navigation, parent-peer support, partnership, and parent participation in caregiving. Most studies found significant improvements in parents' well-being, knowledge, and participation, as well as decreased stress and anxiety with the FCC interventions compared to usual care. One study found no differences in child outcomes (infant feeding, length of stay) between usual care and a parent-participation intervention.
Although FCC interventions led to many improved outcomes for parents, there were few well-designed comparison studies using validated tools and well-defined interventions. Higher quality research is needed to promote greater uptake and sustainability of FCC interventions globally.
背景/目的:以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)是儿科住院护理的推荐模式。我们的总体目标是对当代已发表的关于FCC干预措施对儿科住院患者有效性的研究进行叙述性综合分析。我们的具体目标是对评估儿童或家长结局的儿科住院FCC干预措施研究进行批判性评价。
我们在五个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsychInfo和Web of Science)中搜索了2017年1月1日至2024年2月6日发表的同行评审研究。独立评审员根据预先指定的纳入和排除标准对每项研究进行评估,然后提取并对数据进行叙述性综合分析。
我们发现了在六个国家进行的15项干预措施的16项研究。这些研究包括定量研究(n = 11)、定性研究(n = 3)和混合方法研究(n = 2),根据改良的混合方法评估工具,大多数设计的质量为低到中等。干预措施包括以家庭为中心的查房、以家长为重点的健康信息技术、教育、患者导航、家长同伴支持、伙伴关系以及家长参与护理。与常规护理相比,大多数研究发现FCC干预措施能显著改善家长的幸福感、知识水平和参与度,同时减轻压力和焦虑。一项研究发现常规护理与家长参与干预措施在儿童结局(婴儿喂养、住院时间)方面没有差异。
尽管FCC干预措施为家长带来了许多改善的结局,但使用经过验证的工具和明确界定的干预措施进行的精心设计的比较研究很少。需要更高质量的研究来促进FCC干预措施在全球范围内的更多采用和可持续性。