International Ph.D. Program in Gerontology and Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 110301, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235041, Taiwan.
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 25;16(7):941. doi: 10.3390/nu16070941.
Aging-related sarcopenia exerts harmful impacts on muscle mass, strength, and physical mobility. Protein supplementation has been demonstrated to augment efficacy of resistance training (RT) in elderly. This study compared the relative effects of different protein supplements on muscle mass, strength, and mobility outcomes in middle-aged and older individuals undergoing RT. A comprehensive search of online databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of protein supplement plus RT in untrained community-dwelling adults, hospitalized, or institutionalized residents who suffered acute or chronic health conditions. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using a frequentist method for all analyses. Treatment effects for main outcomes were expressed as standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We used the surface-under-the cumulative-ranking (SUCRA) scores to rank probabilities of effect estimation among all identified treatments. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify any relevant moderator of the treatment efficacy and results were expressed as β with 95% credible interval (CrI). We finally included 78 RCTs (5272 participants) for analyses. Among the six protein sources identified in this NMA, namely whey, milk, casein, meat, soy, and peanut, whey supplement yielded the most effective treatments augmenting efficacy of RT on muscle mass (SMD = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.62; SUCRA = 0.86), handgrip strength (SMD = 1.46, 95% CI: 0.92, 2.00; SUCRA = 0.85), and walking speed (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.07; SUCRA = 0.84). Participant's health condition, sex, and supplementation dose were significant factors moderating the treatment efficacy on muscle mass (β = 0.74; 95% CrI: 0.22, 1.25), handgrip strength (β = -1.72; 95% CrI: -2.68, -0.77), and leg strength (β = 0.76; 95% CrI: 0.06, 1.47), respectively. Our findings suggest whey protein yields the optimal supplements to counter sarcopenia in older individuals undergoing RT.
与年龄相关的肌肉减少症对肌肉质量、力量和身体活动能力都有不良影响。蛋白质补充剂已被证明可以增强老年人抗阻训练(RT)的效果。本研究比较了不同蛋白质补充剂对接受 RT 的中年和老年人肌肉质量、力量和活动能力的相对影响。通过全面检索在线数据库,确定了检查蛋白质补充剂加 RT 对未经训练的社区居住成年人、住院或机构化居民急性或慢性健康状况影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用贝叶斯方法对所有分析进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)。主要结局的治疗效果表示为标准均数差(SMD),置信区间(CI)为 95%。我们使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)评分来对所有鉴定治疗方法的效果估计概率进行排序。进行了元回归分析,以确定治疗效果的任何相关调节因素,并以 95%可信区间(CrI)表示β。最后我们纳入了 78 项 RCT(5272 名参与者)进行分析。在本 NMA 中确定的六种蛋白质来源中,即乳清、牛奶、酪蛋白、肉类、大豆和花生,乳清补充剂对增强 RT 对肌肉质量(SMD = 1.29,95%CI:0.96,1.62;SUCRA = 0.86)、握力(SMD = 1.46,95%CI:0.92,2.00;SUCRA = 0.85)和步行速度(SMD = 0.73,95%CI:0.39,1.07;SUCRA = 0.84)的效果最有效。参与者的健康状况、性别和补充剂量是调节肌肉质量(β=0.74;95%CrI:0.22,1.25)、握力(β=-1.72;95%CrI:-2.68,-0.77)和腿部力量(β=0.76;95%CrI:0.06,1.47)治疗效果的重要因素。我们的研究结果表明,乳清蛋白是对抗接受 RT 的老年人肌肉减少症的最佳补充剂。