Suppr超能文献

在疑似细菌感染的新生儿中,从静脉注射抗生素转换为口服抗生素(阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸)与全程静脉注射抗生素的疗效及安全性比较(RAIN):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验

Efficacy and safety of switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) versus a full course of intravenous antibiotics in neonates with probable bacterial infection (RAIN): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Keij Fleur M, Kornelisse René F, Hartwig Nico G, van der Sluijs-Bens Jacqueline, van Beek Ron H T, van Driel Arianne, van Rooij Linda G M, van Dalen-Vink Ilka, Driessen Gertjan J A, Kenter Sandra, von Lindern Jeannette S, Eijkemans Marianne, Stam-Stigter Gerda M, Qi Hongchao, van den Berg Maartje M, Baartmans Martin G A, van der Meer-Kappelle Laura H, Meijssen Clemens B, Norbruis Obbe F, Heidema Jojanneke, van Rossem Maaike C, den Butter Paul C P, Allegaert Karel, Reiss Irwin K M, Tramper-Stranders Gerdien A

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Paediatrics, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Nov;6(11):799-809. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00245-0. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Switching from intravenous antibiotic therapy to oral antibiotic therapy among neonates is not yet practised in high-income settings due to uncertainties about exposure and safety. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of early intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy compared with a full course of intravenous antibiotics among neonates with probable bacterial infection.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients were recruited at 17 hospitals in the Netherlands. Neonates (postmenstrual age ≥35 weeks, postnatal age 0-28 days, bodyweight ≥2 kg) in whom prolonged antibiotic treatment was indicated because of a probable bacterial infection, were randomly assigned (1:1) to switch to an oral suspension of amoxicillin 75 mg/kg plus clavulanic acid 18·75 mg/kg (in a 4:1 dosing ratio, given daily in three doses) or continue on intravenous antibiotics (according to the local protocol). Both groups were treated for 7 days. The primary outcome was cumulative bacterial reinfection rate 28 days after treatment completion. A margin of 3% was deemed to indicate non-inferiority, thus if the reinfection rate in the oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group was less than 3% higher than that in the intravenous antibiotic group the null hypothesis would be rejected. The primary outcome was assessed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned and completed the final follow-up visit on day 35) and the per protocol population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one administration of the allocated treatment and who completed at least one follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included clinical deterioration and duration of hospitalisation. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03247920, and EudraCT, 2016-004447-36.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 8, 2018 and May 12, 2021, 510 neonates were randomly assigned (n=255 oral amoxicillin-clavulanic group; n=255 intravenous antibiotic group). After excluding those who withdrew consent (n=4), did not fulfil inclusion criteria (n=1), and lost to follow-up (n=1), 252 neonates in each group were included in the intention-to-treat population. The cumulative reinfection rate at day 28 was similar between groups (one [<1%] of 252 neonates in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group vs one [<1%] of 252 neonates in the intravenous antibiotics group; between-group difference 0 [95% CI -1·9 to 1·9]; p<0·0001). No statistically significant differences were observed in reported adverse events (127 [50%] vs 113 [45%]; p=0·247). In the intention-to-treat population, median duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group than the intravenous antibiotics group (3·4 days [95% CI 3·0-4·1] vs 6·8 days [6·5-7·0]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

An early intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is non-inferior to a full course of intravenous antibiotics in neonates with probable bacterial infection and is not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars, and the Sophia Foundation for Scientific Research.

摘要

背景

在高收入地区,由于暴露量和安全性存在不确定性,新生儿从静脉抗生素治疗转换为口服抗生素治疗的做法尚未得到广泛应用。我们旨在评估早期静脉转口服抗生素转换疗法与全程静脉抗生素治疗相比,对可能患有细菌感染的新生儿的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验中,在荷兰的17家医院招募患者。因可能患有细菌感染而需要延长抗生素治疗的新生儿(孕龄≥35周,出生后年龄0-28天,体重≥2kg),被随机分配(1:1)改为口服阿莫西林75mg/kg加克拉维酸18.75mg/kg的混悬液(剂量比为4:1,每日分三次给药)或继续静脉使用抗生素(根据当地方案)。两组均治疗7天。主要结局是治疗完成后28天的累积细菌再感染率。3%的差值被认为表明非劣效性,因此如果口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸组的再感染率比静脉抗生素组高不到3%,则原假设将被拒绝。在意向性治疗人群(即所有随机分配并在第35天完成最后一次随访的患者)和符合方案人群中评估主要结局。对所有接受至少一次分配治疗并完成至少一次随访的患者进行安全性分析。次要结局包括临床恶化和住院时间。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03247920)和EudraCT(2016-004447-36)注册。

结果

在2018年2月8日至2021年5月12日期间,510名新生儿被随机分配(阿莫西林-克拉维酸口服组n = 255;静脉抗生素组n = 255)。在排除那些撤回同意的患者(n = 4)、不符合纳入标准的患者(n = 1)和失访患者(n = 1)后,每组252名新生儿被纳入意向性治疗人群。两组在第28天的累积再感染率相似(阿莫西林-克拉维酸组252名新生儿中有1名[<1%],静脉抗生素组252名新生儿中有1名[<1%];组间差异为0[95%CI -1.9至1.9];p<0.0001)。在报告的不良事件方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异(127例[50%]对113例[45%];p = 0.247)。在意向性治疗人群中,阿莫西林-克拉维酸组的住院中位时间显著短于静脉抗生素组(3.4天[95%CI 3.0-4.1]对6.8天[6.5-7.0];p<0.0001)。

解读

对于可能患有细菌感染的新生儿,早期静脉转口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸抗生素疗法不劣于全程静脉抗生素治疗,且与不良事件发生率增加无关。

资助

荷兰卫生研究与发展组织、医疗保险公司创新基金和索菲亚科学研究基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验