Brandt Philipp
Department of Sociology, Sciences Po/CSO, Paris, France.
Front Big Data. 2024 Aug 14;7:1287442. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1287442. eCollection 2024.
"Data scientists" quickly became ubiquitous, often infamously so, but they have struggled with the ambiguity of their novel role. This article studies data science's collective definition on Twitter.
The analysis responds to the challenges of studying an emergent case with unclear boundaries and substance through a cultural perspective and complementary datasets ranging from 1,025 to 752,815 tweets. It brings together relations between accounts that tweeted about data science, the hashtags they used, indicating purposes, and the topics they discussed.
The first results reproduce familiar commercial and technical motives. Additional results reveal concerns with new practical and ethical standards as a distinctive motive for constructing data science.
The article provides a sensibility for local meaning in usually abstract datasets and a heuristic for navigating increasingly abundant datasets toward surprising insights. For data scientists, it offers a guide for positioning themselves vis-à-vis others to navigate their professional future.
“数据科学家”迅速变得无处不在,常常声名狼藉,但他们一直在努力应对其新角色的模糊性。本文研究了推特上数据科学的集体定义。
该分析通过文化视角和从1025条到752815条推文不等的补充数据集,应对研究一个边界和实质内容都不明确的新兴案例所面临的挑战。它汇集了发布有关数据科学推文的账户之间的关系、他们使用的表明目的的主题标签以及他们讨论的话题。
首批结果重现了常见的商业和技术动机。其他结果揭示了对新的实践和道德标准的关注,这是构建数据科学的一个独特动机。
本文为通常抽象的数据集中的局部意义提供了一种感知,并为在日益丰富的数据集中获取惊人见解提供了一种启发式方法。对于数据科学家来说,它为他们相对于其他人定位自己以规划职业未来提供了指导。