Suppr超能文献

在线药店产品目录中对德国治疗产品广告法的遵守不足。

Insufficient compliance of the German Therapeutic Products Advertising Act in product catalogues of online pharmacies.

作者信息

Barlage Lara, Seifert Roland

机构信息

Institute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;398(2):1925-1947. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03370-7. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

Abstract

The importance of ordering drugs from online pharmacies in Germany is increasing constantly. At the same time, there are many online pharmacies that try to increase their own market share through advertising. In Germany, the advertising of drugs is regulated by the Therapeutic Products Advertising Act (Heilmittelwerbegesetz (HWG)) and must therefore also be complied with by online pharmacies in their product catalogues. One important purpose of the HWG is to protect consumers by ensuring that they are presented with all necessary medical-pharmacological information about the advertised product. This paper examines the implementation of as well as the compliance with Section 4 of the HWG in the product catalogues of two online pharmacies. For this purpose, the spring/summer catalogue of 2023 was considered in the allergy, cold and gastrointestinal tract categories, resulting in the inclusion of 143 drugs from online pharmacy 1 (OP1) and 102 drugs from online pharmacy 2 (OP2) for the analysis. The information on the drugs was taken from the respective catalogue and the pharmaceutical index 'Gelbe Liste', collected in tabular form and was encoded. Subsequently, the required mandatory information according to Section 4 was checked by comparing the collected information with the information from the package leaflet. The analysis revealed that both catalogues insufficiently complied with Section 4 of the HWG. OP1 complied with 75% of the mandatory information required under Section 4 of the HWG and OP2 with 64%. In the OP1 catalogue, there is no indication for 6% of the drugs and no specification for 29% of the traditionally registered drugs. In addition, the mandatory notice on risks and adverse effects in the OP1 catalogue is not presented in a consumer-friendly way. In the OP2 catalogue, further concerns about the compliance with the HWG were raised due to the missing indication for 17% of the drugs, no warning for 64% of the ethanol-containing drugs and no active ingredient for 31% of the monopreparations. The insufficient compliance with the HWG in the product catalogues of OP1 and OP2 means that consumer protection as a stated objective of the HWG cannot be guaranteed. Advertising for drugs should only be possible under the condition that the content of the advertisement complies with the HWG. Insufficient compliance, as in the product catalogue of OP1 and OP2, should be prohibited as it directly contradicts the law's objective.

摘要

在德国,从网上药店订购药品的重要性在不断增加。与此同时,有许多网上药店试图通过广告来增加自身的市场份额。在德国,药品广告受《治疗产品广告法》(Heilmittelwerbegesetz (HWG))监管,因此网上药店在其产品目录中也必须遵守该法。HWG的一个重要目的是通过确保向消费者提供有关广告产品的所有必要医学药理学信息来保护消费者。本文研究了HWG第4条在两家网上药店产品目录中的实施情况及合规情况。为此,考虑了2023年春夏目录中过敏、感冒和胃肠道类别中的药品,分析纳入了网上药店1(OP1)的143种药品和网上药店2(OP2)的102种药品。药品信息取自各自的目录和药品索引《黄色清单》,以表格形式收集并进行编码。随后,通过将收集到的信息与包装说明书中的信息进行比较,检查了第4条要求的强制信息。分析表明,两个目录都未充分遵守HWG第4条。OP1遵守了HWG第4条要求的75%的强制信息,OP2遵守了64%。在OP1目录中,6%的药品没有适应症,29%的传统注册药品没有规格说明。此外,OP1目录中关于风险和不良反应的强制说明没有以消费者友好的方式呈现。在OP2目录中,由于17%的药品没有适应症、64%含乙醇药品没有警示以及31%的单方制剂没有活性成分,引发了对其遵守HWG情况的进一步担忧。OP1和OP2产品目录对HWG的遵守不足意味着HWG规定的消费者保护目标无法得到保证。药品广告只有在广告内容符合HWG的条件下才应被允许。像OP1和OP2产品目录那样遵守不足的情况应被禁止,因为这直接违背了法律目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec0/11825602/66d9ef10491b/210_2024_3370_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验