• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床结局评估(COA)概念映射最佳实践框架:案例研究。

A framework for best practices in clinical outcome assessment (COA) concept mapping: a case study.

机构信息

Quality Metric, Johnston, RI, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2941-2948. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03773-2. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03773-2
PMID:39207628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11541245/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Mapping or matching the items in a clinical outcome assessment (COA) to concepts that define a condition is a common method for evaluating a COA's concept coverage. The purpose of this research was to address the lack of formal guidance for conducting this task by developing a framework for best practices in COA concept mapping and applying it to a case study.

METHODS

To develop the framework, we examined the literature and created a draft set of best practices which was then reviewed by experienced researchers through focus groups before being finalized. To conduct the case study, we extracted data from a systematic review of knee osteoarthritis (KO) symptoms and impacts and used the framework to map relevant concepts to items in the SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2).

RESULTS

The framework guides researchers in defining the purpose of and data sources for the mapping, establishing guiding principles and decision-making thresholds, and conducting the mapping exercise. The results of the case study demonstrate the usefulness of the framework in identifying 27/36 items (75%) in the SF-36v2 that addressed concepts that define KO.

CONCLUSION

This case study illustrates how the framework for best practices in COA concept mapping may be used, highlighting how establishing clear concept definitions and guiding principles and following a structured process throughout can help produce consistent, reliable, and reproducible results. The results from this rigorous approach can provide valuable evidence to support decisions about the appropriateness of a COA for the intended patient population.

摘要

目的

将临床结局评估(COA)中的项目与定义疾病的概念相匹配或映射,是评估 COA 概念覆盖范围的常用方法。本研究旨在通过开发 COA 概念映射最佳实践框架并将其应用于案例研究来解决缺乏该任务正式指导的问题。

方法

为了开发该框架,我们查阅了文献,并创建了一套最佳实践草案,然后通过焦点小组由经验丰富的研究人员进行了审查,最后定稿。为了进行案例研究,我们从膝关节骨关节炎(KO)症状和影响的系统评价中提取数据,并使用该框架将相关概念映射到 SF-36v2 健康调查(SF-36v2)中的项目。

结果

该框架指导研究人员定义映射的目的和数据源,建立指导原则和决策阈值,并进行映射练习。案例研究的结果表明,该框架在确定 SF-36v2 中 27/36 项(75%)可用于定义 KO 的概念方面非常有用。

结论

本案例研究说明了 COA 概念映射最佳实践框架的使用方法,突出了如何明确概念定义和指导原则,并在整个过程中遵循结构化流程,有助于产生一致、可靠和可重复的结果。这种严格方法的结果可以为评估 COA 是否适合目标患者群体提供有价值的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1b/11541245/ee5d92499da7/11136_2024_3773_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1b/11541245/921d93849c9d/11136_2024_3773_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1b/11541245/ee5d92499da7/11136_2024_3773_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1b/11541245/921d93849c9d/11136_2024_3773_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1b/11541245/ee5d92499da7/11136_2024_3773_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A framework for best practices in clinical outcome assessment (COA) concept mapping: a case study.临床结局评估(COA)概念映射最佳实践框架:案例研究。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2941-2948. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03773-2. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Development of a New Tool for Evaluating the Benefit of Preventive Treatments for Migraine on Functional Outcomes - The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ).开发一种新工具评估偏头痛预防性治疗对功能结局的获益 - 偏头痛功能影响问卷(MFIQ)。
Headache. 2018 Nov;58(10):1612-1628. doi: 10.1111/head.13420. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.使用现有患者报告结局(PRO)工具及其修改版:ISPOR 现有工具使用及其修改版的内容效度评估和文件记录的良好研究实践 PRO 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
5
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 1 部分——为新 PRO 工具征集概念。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
7
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
8
A concept taxonomy and an instrument hierarchy: tools for establishing and evaluating the conceptual framework of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument as applied to product labeling claims.概念分类法和工具层级:用于建立和评估患者报告结局(PRO)工具的概念框架的工具,适用于产品标签声明。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1158-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00609.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
9
Content validation of the SF-36v2® health survey with AL amyloidosis patients.SF-36v2®健康调查在AL淀粉样变性患者中的内容效度验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0020-7. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Qualitative Development and Content Validity of the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), A Patient-reported Outcome Instrument.非小细胞肺癌症状评估问卷(NSCLC-SAQ)的质性开发与内容效度:一项患者报告结局工具
Clin Ther. 2016 Apr;38(4):794-810. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Results from Patient Interviews on Fatigue in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Evaluation of Fatigue Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments.进行性多发性硬化症疲劳患者访谈结果及疲劳患者报告结局(PRO)工具评估
Neurol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):725-739. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00337-9. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW AND MAPPING EXERCISE.患者报告的儿科牙科患者结局测量指标:方法学综述和映射练习。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Jan;22(1S):101661. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101661. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
3
Identifying Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Routine Surveillance of Physical and Emotional Symptoms in Head and Neck Cancer Populations: A Systematic Review.
确定用于头颈癌患者身体和情绪症状常规监测的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 15;10(18):4162. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184162.
4
Letting the patients speak: an in-depth, qualitative research-based investigation of factors relevant to health-related quality of life in real-world patients with hereditary angioedema using subcutaneous C1 inhibitor replacement therapy.倾听患者心声:一项基于深入定性研究的调查,探究皮下注射C1抑制剂替代疗法治疗的遗传性血管性水肿真实世界患者中与健康相关生活质量相关的因素。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun 27;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00550-5.
5
Application of the refinements of ICF linking rules to the Visual Analogue Scale, Roland Morris questionnaire and SF-36.应用国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的细化版对视觉模拟评分量表、罗尔登·莫里斯问卷和 SF-36 进行分析。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Mar;26(3):1137-1152. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021263.03502019. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
6
Mapping epilepsy-specific patient-reported outcome measures for children to a proposed core outcome set for childhood epilepsy.将针对儿童的癫痫患者报告结局测量指标映射到儿童癫痫的拟议核心结局集。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov;112:107372. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107372. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
7
Experience of living with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of qualitative studies.膝关节骨关节炎的生活体验:定性研究的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e030060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030060.
8
Identifying Meaningful Patient Outcomes After Lower Extremity Injury, Part 2: Linking Outcomes to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.下肢损伤后有意义的患者结局的识别,第 2 部分:将结局与国际功能、残疾和健康分类联系起来。
J Athl Train. 2019 Aug;54(8):869-880. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-233-18. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Matching the perceived benefits of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain against Patient Reported Outcome Measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).将经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的感知益处与使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的患者报告结局测量相匹配。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Mar;106:128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information.国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的细化,以加强其建立健康信息可比性的潜力。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):574-583. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258. Epub 2016 Mar 17.