Pearson Amber L, Horton Teresa, Pfeiffer Karin A, Buxton Rachel, Gardiner Joseph, Liu Wei, Hunter Ruth F, White Mathew
Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Front Sustain Cities. 2021 Aug;3. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.688473. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
Despite a growing number of research outputs on the importance of nature contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, we know of no longitudinal research conducted prior to and during the pandemic among low-income and minority ethnicity populations, i.e. those that might be most affected. Furthermore, we have scant information about how and to what degree contact with nature might protect mental health or mitigate worsening of mental health during the pandemic. We filled these gaps using a subset of a longitudinal study of n = 86 individuals in low-income, predominantly African American, neighborhoods in Detroit, MI, USA. The study addressed the following research questions: 1) did self-reported use and perceived value of nature change during, versus prior to, the pandemic; 2) did perceived access to outdoor spaces buffer people against mental health issues such as stress, anxiety and depression symptoms; or 3) did objectively measured quality of nature views from home buffer people against mental health issues, taking into account relevant covariates and pandemic experiences (e.g., loss of employment, death of a friend/relative)? While attitudes to nature improved slightly from pre- to during the pandemic, we also observed significant decreases in most types of outdoor physical activity and passive enjoyment of nature (e.g., smelling plants/rain). We found a positive association between visibility of greenspace and perceived stress and anxiety, which not only contradicts previous research findings, but was especially surprising given that overall there was a decrease in perceived stress from 2019-2020. We did not detect associations between perceived access/use of nature and mental health. However, higher depressive symptoms were associated with exposure to more COVID-19-related stressors (lost employment, death of friends from COVID-19, etc.). Taken together, our results indicate that COVID-19 may serve to prolong or exacerbate mental health issues, rather than create them, in this population and that low quality greenspace may perhaps limit the ability for nature view to buffer mental health during the pandemic.
尽管在新冠疫情期间,关于接触自然的重要性的研究成果越来越多,但我们所知,在疫情之前和期间,尚未对低收入和少数族裔群体(即那些可能受影响最大的群体)进行过纵向研究。此外,我们几乎没有信息表明在疫情期间接触自然如何以及在多大程度上能够保护心理健康或减轻心理健康的恶化。我们利用对美国密歇根州底特律市低收入、主要为非裔美国人社区的86名个体进行的纵向研究的一个子集填补了这些空白。该研究解决了以下研究问题:1)与疫情之前相比,疫情期间自我报告的对自然的使用和感知价值是否发生了变化;2)感知到的户外空间可及性是否能缓冲人们免受压力、焦虑和抑郁症状等心理健康问题的影响;或者3)考虑到相关协变量和疫情经历(例如失业、朋友/亲属死亡),从家中客观测量的自然景观质量是否能缓冲人们免受心理健康问题的影响?虽然从疫情前到疫情期间对自然的态度略有改善,但我们也观察到大多数类型的户外体育活动和对自然的被动享受(例如闻植物/雨的气息)显著减少。我们发现绿地可见度与感知到的压力和焦虑之间存在正相关,这不仅与之前的研究结果相矛盾,而且鉴于2019 - 2020年感知到的压力总体上有所下降,这一点尤其令人惊讶。我们没有发现感知到的对自然的可及性/使用与心理健康之间的关联。然而,更高的抑郁症状与接触更多与新冠疫情相关的压力源(失业、因新冠疫情失去朋友等)有关。综上所述,我们的结果表明,在这一人群中,新冠疫情可能会延长或加剧心理健康问题,而不是引发这些问题,并且低质量的绿地可能会限制自然景观在疫情期间缓冲心理健康的能力。